Question.3599 - Why do you think a society would address liability for civil wrongs separately from criminal wrongs? Should a wrongdoer be potentially liable both for civil wrongs as well as for criminal wrongs related to the same wrongdoing? Sometimes people excuse the damage they cause by saying this was a mistake or that they did not mean to cause the damage. Is this a valid excuse to avoid liability for damage caused? Explain your answer. In common law countries, strict liability was originally imposed for abnormally dangerous activities. What was the rationale for extending strict liability to everyday products sold in commerce? Do you agree with this extension of strict liability? Explain your answer.
Answer Below:
nbsp xxxxx professor xxx everyone xxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx purposes xxxx separate xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx and xxxxxxxx wrongs xxxxx within xxx legal xxxxxxxxx civil xxx tends xx emphasize xxxxxxxxxxxx individuals xxxxxxxx for xxx harms xxxxxxxxx on xxxx by xxxxxx to xxxxxxx them xx their xxxxxxxx state xx even xxxxxxx monetary xxxxxxxxxxxx for xxx damages xxxxx on xxx other xxxx criminal xxx emphasizes xx implementing xxxxxxxx measures xx restore xxxxxxxx norms xxxx and xx deter xxxx criminal xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx rehabilitative xxxxxxxx Binder xxxxxx However xxxxx are xxxxxxx possibilities xxxxx a xxxxxx act xxx be xxxx civil xxx criminal xxxxxxxxx but xxxxx two xxxxx of xxxxxx are xxxxxxx separately xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx standards xx proof xxxxxxx civil xxxxx demand x preponderance xx the xxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxx cases xxxxxx higher xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx beyond xxxxxxxxxx doubt xxxx underlying xxxxxxxxxx reflects xxxxxx consequence xxxxxxxx different xxxxxxxx for xxxx like xxxxx cases xxxxxxx incline xxxxxxx monetary xxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxx cases xxxxxxxx towards xxxxxxxxxxxx fines xx other xxxxx of xxxxxxxx measures xxxxxx Watkin xxxx Although xxxxx are xxxxxxx factors xxxx could xxxxxxxxx I xxxxx like xx incline xxxxxxx stating xxxx - x wrongdoer xxx be xxxx liable xxx both xxxxx and xxxxxxxx wrongs xxx the xxxx incident xxxx liability xxx instance xx a xxxxxx who xxxxxxxx another xx breaking xxxx their xxxxxxx property-is xxxx subjected xx the xxxxx case xxx the xxxxxx caused xxxxxxx dual xxxxxxxxx tends xx serve xxxx the xxxxxxxx that xxxxxx punitive xxxxxxxx deter xxxxxxxx activities xxx compensate xxxxxxx losses x all xxxxxxxx equitable xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Binder xxxxxx nbsp xx terms xx the xxxxxx of xxxxxxx or xxxx of xxxxxx revolves xxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxx offender xxx the xxxxxxxx depends xx applicable xxx and xxxx case xx relates xx wherein xxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxx law xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx if xxxxx utilized xxxxx occurs xxxx a xxxxxx fails xx exercise xxxxxxxxxx care xx scenario xxxx did xxx intend xx cause xxxx - xxx instance xx a xxxxxx while xxxxxxx for x medical xxxxxxxxx of x close xxxxxxxx inflict xx causes xx accident xxxx be xxxx liable xxx damage xxxx if xxx intent xxx not xx cause xxxx meaning xxx intent xx cause xxxx or xxx do xxx apply xxx civil xxxxxxxxxxx while xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx law xxxxx where xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx like xxxxxx liability xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx driver xxxx be xxxx liable xxxx if xxx intent xx not xx commit x crime xxxx for xxxxxxxx selling xxxxxxxxxxx food xxxxx under xxxxxx liability xxxxx and xxxx be xxxx liable xxxx if xxxx aren't xxxxx about xxxxxxx adulterated xxxx Binder xxxxxx So xxxx excuses xx mistake xx intent xxx dynamic xx nature xxxxxxxxx on xxx cases xxxxxxxxxx laws xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx damage xxxx and xxxxxxxx of xxxxx evidence xxxx According xx understanding xxxx strict xxxxxxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxx imposed xxx abnormal xxxxxxxxx activities xxxx caging xxxx animals xx housing xxxxxxxxxx but xx was xxxxxxxxxx amended xx regulate xxxxxxxxxxxxx sectors xxxx defectively xxxxxxxxxxxxx everyday xxx products xxxxxxx liability xxxxxxx their xxxxx bleak xxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx their xxxxxxxxxx because xx consumer xxxxxxx sided xxxxxxxx without xxxxxxx if xx will xx defective xx no xx the xxxx run xxxx depicts x pathway xx excessive xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx hampering xxx scope xx innovation xxx investment xx the xxxxxxx development xxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx G xxxxxxxx Law xxxxxx University xxxxx Morrison x B xx nbsp xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx law xxxxxx University xxxxx Watkin x G xx historical xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx civil xxx Routledge xxxx nbspMore Articles From Business Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
