Question.3599 - Why do you think a society would address liability for civil wrongs separately from criminal wrongs? Should a wrongdoer be potentially liable both for civil wrongs as well as for criminal wrongs related to the same wrongdoing? Sometimes people excuse the damage they cause by saying this was a mistake or that they did not mean to cause the damage. Is this a valid excuse to avoid liability for damage caused? Explain your answer. In common law countries, strict liability was originally imposed for abnormally dangerous activities. What was the rationale for extending strict liability to everyday products sold in commerce? Do you agree with this extension of strict liability? Explain your answer.
Answer Below:
Hello xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx from xxx notion xx distinct xxxxxxxx both xxxxxxxx treatments xx civil xxx criminal xxxxxx serve xxxxxx our xxxxx structure xxxxx law xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx compensating xxxxxxxxxxx entities xxx the xxxxx inflicted xx them xx others xx restore xxxx to xxxxx original xxxxx or xxxx provide xxxxxxxx compensation xxx the xxxxxxx while xx the xxxxx side xxxxxxxx law xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxx punitive xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx societal xxxxx laws xxx to xxxxx from xxxxxxxx activities xx providing xxxxxxxxxxxxxx measures xxxxxx Watkin xxxxxxx there xxx several xxxxxxxxxxxxx where x single xxx can xx both xxxxx and xxxxxxxx liability xxx these xxx types xx wrongs xxx treated xxxxxxxxxx because xx different xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx wherein xxxxx cases xxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx evidence xxxxx criminal xxxxx demand xxxxxx standards xx proof xxxxxx reasonable xxxxx this xxxxxxxxxx difference xxxxxxxx varied xxxxxxxxxxx secondly xxxxxxxxx remedies xxx both xxxx civil xxxxx usually xxxxxxx towards xxxxxxxx remedies xxxxx criminal xxxxx inclines xxxxxxx imprisonment xxxxx or xxxxx forms xx punitive xxxxxxxx Binder xxxxxx Although xxxxx are xxxxxxx factors xxxx could xxxxxxxxx I xxxxx like xx incline xxxxxxx stating xxxx - x wrongdoer xxx be xxxx liable xxx both xxxxx and xxxxxxxx wrongs xxx the xxxx incident xxxx liability xxx instance xx a xxxxxx who xxxxxxxx another xx breaking xxxx their xxxxxxx property-is xxxx subjected xx the xxxxx case xxx the xxxxxx caused xxxxxxx dual xxxxxxxxx tends xx serve xxxx the xxxxxxxx that xxxxxx punitive xxxxxxxx deter xxxxxxxx activities xxx compensate xxxxxxx losses x all xxxxxxxx equitable xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Binder xxxxxx In xxxxx of xxx excuse xx mistake xx lack xx intent xxxxxxxx around xxx intent xx the xxxxxxxx but xxx validity xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx law xxx what xxxx it xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx within xxx scope xx civil xxx where xx negligence xx often xxxxxxxx which xxxxxx when x person xxxxx to xxxxxxxx reasonable xxxx in xxxxxxxx they xxx not xxxxxx to xxxxx harm x for xxxxxxxx if x driver xxxxx rushing xxx a xxxxxxx emergency xx a xxxxx relative xxxxxxx or xxxxxx an xxxxxxxx will xx held xxxxxx for xxxxxx even xx the xxxxxx was xxx to xxxxx harm xxxxxxx the xxxxxx to xxxxx harm xx not xx not xxxxx for xxxxx liabilities xxxxx within xxx criminal xxx scope xxxxx there xx exceptions xxxx strict xxxxxxxxx crimes xxx defendant xxxxxx will xx held xxxxxx even xx the xxxxxx is xxx to xxxxxx a xxxxx like xxx instance xxxxxxx adulterated xxxx falls xxxxx strict xxxxxxxxx crime xxx will xx held xxxxxx even xx they xxxxxx aware xxxxx selling xxxxxxxxxxx food xxxxxx Watkin xx both xxxxxxx of xxxxxxx or xxxxxx are xxxxxxx in xxxxxx depending xx the xxxxx applicable xxxx nature xx inflicted xxxxxx harm xxx validity xx proof xxxxxxxx According xx understanding xxxx strict xxxxxxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxx imposed xxx abnormal xxxxxxxxx activities xxxx caging xxxx animals xx housing xxxxxxxxxx but xx was xxxxxxxxxx amended xx regulate xxxxxxxxxxxxx sectors xxxx defectively xxxxxxxxxxxxx everyday xxx products xxxxxxx liability xxxxxxx their xxxxx bleak xxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx their xxxxxxxxxx because xx consumer xxxxxxx sided xxxxxxxx without xxxxxxx if xx will xx defective xx no xx the xxxx run xxxx depicts x pathway xx excessive xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx hampering xxx scope xx innovation xxx investment xx the xxxxxxx development xxxxxxxx ReferencesBinder x Criminal xxx Oxford xxxxxxxxxx Press xxxxxxxx A x Ed xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx law xxxxxx University xxxxx Watkin x G xx historical xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx civil xxx RoutledgeMore Articles From Business Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
