Question.2796 - Each student is required to create an Annotated Bibliography that provides an overview of research and information relative to the social problem you identified in your Social Problems Exploration Assignment. Students are to explore the social problem through reading articles and generate an understanding of that particular social problem. Questions to consider while reading the articles you selected include: What and how is the problem defined? What has been done to address the problem? What does the research say is the reason the problem exists and persists? What recommendations are given to address the problem? At the beginning of your Annotated Bibliography provide one paragraph which identifies the social problem examined and why you chose it. Then provide your sources and their annotations. Review the material I have put together for more information about an annotated bibliography (https://lrccd.instructure.com/courses/197732/pages/annotated-bibliography-resources) . Requirements The Annotated Bibliography must have a minimum of six (6) sources overall and adhere to APA format. A minimum of three (3) of the six (6) must be scholarly sources (i.e., journal articles, etc.). Refer to the links in Canvas and the ARC Library regarding how to develop an Annotated Bibliography and how to adhere to APA format, as well as what is a scholarly source. If you have questions you should email the instructor at least five days before the due date to gain assistance. Annotated Bibliographies must be saved with a “doc”, “docx” or “pdf” file extension and submitted in that format within the designated assignment area in Canvas; submissions will NOT be accepted in any other format nor via email.14/07/2023, 06:52 Annotated Bibliographyhttps://lrccd.instructure.com/courses/197732/assignments/5046951 2/4 Annotated Bibliography Rubric All late submissions will receive a five (5)-point deduction for each day it is submitted late, up to three days beyond the due date. No submission will be accepted after that date. If you submit your paper in an incorrect format and it is resubmitted after the original due date, the late submission policies will also apply. The Annotated Bibliography is worth 75 points.
Answer Below:
Annotated xxxxxxxxxxxx Workplace xxxxxxxxxxxx is x major xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx when xxxxxxxxxx have xxxxxx fundamentally xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx employee xxxx a xxxxx spectrum xxxxxxxxxxxx is x threat xx workplace xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx from xxx viewpoint xx the xxxxxxxx From xxx side xx the xxxxxxxx workplace xxxxxxxxxxxx affects xxxxxxx facets xx their xxxxx It xxx be x social xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx standpoint xxxx workplaces xxxx mechanisms xxxx have xxxx put xx place xx recent xxxxx to xxxxxx that xxxx workplace xxxxxxxxxxxx has xxxx contained xxxxxxx often xxxxx measures xxx not xxxxxxxxxxx across xxx board xxxxxxxxxxx It xx essential xxxx we xxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxx issues xx ensure xx make xxxxxxxxxx safe xxx the xxxxxxxxx working xx everyone xxxx et xx Stereotype xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx Scope xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Interventions xxx authors xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx engages xxx reader xx defining xxx scope xx the xxxxxxxxx stereotype xxxxxxx in xxx organizations xxx effect xx stereotyping xx examined xxxxxx a xxxxx spectrum xxxx the xxxxxxxxx psychological xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx threat xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxx performances xx the xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxx at xx evaluating xxx performance xx the xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx four xxxxxxx which xxx negotiations xxxxxxxxxx competitiveness xxx entrepreneurship xxx article xxxx investigates xxx possible xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx which xxxxxxxx organizational xxxxxxx task xxxxxxxxxx organizational xxxxxxxxx etc xxx authors xxxx identify xxxxx major xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx that xxx be xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx threat xxxx as xxxxxxxxx efforts xx improve xxxxxxxxxxxxxx culture xxxx by xxxxx of xxxxxx and xxxxxxx efforts xxxxxxxxxx management xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx minority xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as xxxx as xxx trainings xxxxx J xxxx Bohuslava xxxxx ov x et xx M x The xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx Stereotypes xx The xxxx of xxxxxxxx University xx Economics xx Bratislava xxx prospect xx stereotyping xxx be xxxxxxxxx seen xx most xxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx inequality xxxx affects xxxxx and xxxxxxxx gender xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx factor xxxxxxxxx society xxx authors xxxxx their xxxxxxxx on xxx consequences xx these xxxxxxxx stereotyping xxx on xxx work xx managers xxx article xxxxxx out xxxx our xxxxxxxx biased xxxxx note xxx and xxxxx to xxxx particular xxxxx and xxx deviation xxxx these xxxxx is xxxx as xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx organizational xxxxxxxxx We xxxxx assign xxx role xx leaders xx men xxx look xx them xx be xxxx logical xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Whereas xxxxx are xxxxx looked xx from xxx perceptive xx being xxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxx of xxx family xxx children xxxx perception xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx we xxxx to xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxx looks xx it xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx role xx a xxx being x manager xxx would xxxxxxxxx recruit xxxxxxx man xx be xx that xxxxxxxx The xxxxx concludes xxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx representation xx women xxx any xxxxxxxxxx positions xx an xxxxxxx of xxxxx gendered xxxxxxxxxxxx Bohuslava xxxxx ov x Heilman x E xxxxxx stereotypes xxx workplace xxxx Research xx Organisational xxxxxxxxxx This xxxxx had xxxxxxx on xxxxxx stereotypes xx workplaces xxx the xxxxxx that xxxxxx between xxx and xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxx structures xx looks xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx gender xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx gender xxxxxxxxxxx across xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx implications xx has xx the xxxxxx trajectory xx women xxx paper xxxxxxx on xxx argument xxxx these xxxxxxxx stereotyping xxxxx rise xx biased xxxxxxxxx which xxxxxx and xxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxx It xxxx discuses xxxxx how xxxxxxxxxxx gender xxxxxxxxxxx promotes xxx gender xxxxxx as xxxxx is x negative xxxxxxxxxxx expectations xxxxx results xxxx perceptions xxxx there xxx certain xxxx fits xxxx what xxxxx are xxx the xxxxxxxxxx that xxx generally xxxx as xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx in x male xxxxxxxxxxxx positions xxx roles xx discuses xx how xxx prescriptive xxxxxx stereotypes xxxxxxxx gender xxxxxx in xxx form xx creating xxxxxxxxx standards xxx behaviors xxxxx induce xxxxxx penalties xxxx women xxx successful xx the xxxxx that x generally xxxxxx as x male xxxxxxxxx field xxxxxxx Hall x S xxxxxxxxxx Threat xx School xxx at xxxx Putting xxxxxxx intoPractice xxxxxx Insights xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx SciencesThe xxxxxxx Schmader xxx Hall xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx research xx the xxxxxxxxx which xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx threat xxx about xxxxxxxxx policies xxxxx could xxxxxx its xxxxxxx Public xxxxxx can xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx equal xxxxxx to xxxxxxx opportunities xxx a xxxxxx to xxxxxxx his xx her xxxxxxxxx at xxx or xxx workplace xx this xxxxxx scenario xxx though xxxxxxxx can xxxxxxxxx institutional xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxx basis xx race xx sex xxxxx women xxx minorities xxxxxxxx to xxxx into xxx categories xx underperformers xxx are xxxxx underrepresented xxxx in xxx highest xxxxxxx occupations xxxxxxxx papers xx social xxxxxxxxxx suggest xxxxx negative xxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx could xxxxxx barriers xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxx professional xxxxxxx The xxxxxxx used xxxxxxxxxxxxxx analysis xx review xxx risks xxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxx policies xxxxxxxxxxx action xxxxxxxx training xxxxxxxx identity-safe xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx coping xxxxxxxxxx These xxxxxxxx could xxxxxx the xxxxxx and xxxxxx gaps xxxx prevail xx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx performance xxxx Crump xx al xxxx Stereotypes xxx the xxx Gender xxx Gap xxxxxxxxx at xxx Academy xx world xxxxxxxx Marketing xxxxxxxxxx Development xxxxxxxxxx BudapestThe xxxxxxx Crump xx al xx their xxxxx examine xxx impact xx gender xxxx stereotypes xx the xxx equity xxx the xxxxxx professionals xxxxxxx in xxx Informational xxxxxxxxxxxxx Technology xxx ICT xxxxxxxx various xxxxxxxxxx opportunities xxx yet xxxxx are xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx continue xx earn xxxx when xxxxxxxx to xxxxx male xxxxxxxxxx They xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx data xxxx was xxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxx interviews xx women xxxxxxx in xxx New xxxxxxx ICT xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx reveled xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx discrimination xxxxxxxxxxx to xxx persistence xx the xxx inequity xxx paper xxxxxx with x discussion xx the xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx then xx is xxxxxxxx by x discussion xx New xxxxxxx s xxx Census xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx is xxxx described xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx results xxx followed xx a xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx concludes xx the xxxxxxxxxx that xxx gap xxxxx be xxxxxx by xxx shift xx the xxxxxx norms xxxxx shape xxx preferences xxx creates xxxxxxxxxxxxx images xxxxx July xxxxxx K x Judiesch x K xxx women xxxx likely xx be xxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx management xxxxxxxxx Journal xx Vocational xxxxxxxxxxx author xxxxxx in xxx paper xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx in xxxxxxxx to xxx would xxxx often xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx positions xx a xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx versus xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx on xxx financial xxxxxxx managers xxxx studies xxx information xxx analyzed xxxxx on xxx human xxxxxxx variables xxx personal xxxxx for xxxx a xxxxxx of xxxxx years xxx author xxxxx on xxx sex xxxxxxxxxx research xxxxxxxx regression xxxxxxxx had xxxxxx that xxxxxxxx to xxx women xxxx more xxxxxx to xx promoted xxxx hired xxxx management xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxx regression xxxxxxxx result xxx shown xxxx there xxxx no xxxxxxxx of xxx gender xxxx in xxx number xx overall xxxxxxxxxx However xxxxx were xxxx evidences xx level xxxxxxxxxx effect xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx to xxx women xx higher xxxxx positions xxx received xxxxx promotions xxxx the xxxxx in xxx lower xxxxx The xxxxx discusses xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx findings xxx careers xx the xxxxxx managers xxx glass xxxxxxx issues xxxxxx ReferencesCrump xxxx Stereotypes xxx the xxx Gender xxx Gap xxxxxxxxx at xxx Academy xx world xxxxxxxx Marketing xxxxxxxxxx Development xxxxxxxxxx Budapest xxxxxxxxx from xxxx BUDAPESTSTEREOTYPES xxx pdfHall x S xxxxxxxxxx Threat xx School xxx at xxxx Putting xxxxxxx into xxxxxxxx Policy xxxxxxxx from xxx Behavioral xxx Brain xxxxxxxx Reterived xxxx https xxxxxxxx sagepub xxx doi xxx Lyness xxx women xxxx likely xx be xxxxx or xxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxxxx positions xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Behavior xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx doi xxx jvbe xxxx et xx Stereotype xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx Scope xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Interventions xxxx Retrieved xxxxx irle xxxxxxxx edu xxxxx Stereotype-Threat-in-Organizations xxx Bohuslava xxxxx ov x et xx M x The xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx Stereotypes xx The xxxx of xxxxxxxx University xx Economics xx Bratislava xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx core xx uk xxxxxxxx pdf xxx Heilman x E xxxxxx stereotypes xxx workplace xxxx Research xx Organisational xxxxxxxxxx Retrieved xxxx https xxx icos xxxxx edu xxxxx default xxxxx lecturereadinglists xxxxxxx Gender xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Bias x ROB xxxMore Articles From Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
