Question.2374 - Assignment #1 - Case Study: This week, you will read the case study “The Team That Wasn’t” (attached above) and complete a 4-5 page case analysis paper. Imagine you have been hired as a communication consultant to help Eric and his team to work together. What problems does this team have? Why doesn’t this team work? Do you think this team could work together? Why or why not? Is Eric a good leader? Why or why not? Your paper should be divided into three parts, with a brief introduction (no more than 2 paragraphs) summarizing the case and setting up the structure of your paper. Then, you can respond to each of the three prompts using numbers (1, 2, and 3). Support your argument with examples from course readings and specific details from the case study.
Answer Below:
IntroductionThe xxxx Arts xxxx is xxxxxxxxxxxx FireArt xxx has xxxxxxxx problems xxxx range xxxx lack xx cooperation xx monetary xxxxxx These xxxxxxxx stop xxx FireArt xxxx from xxxxxxxxx competence xxxxxxx teamwork xxxxxxxxxxx Eric xx not x good xxxxxx and xxxxx not xxxxxx his xxxx efficiently xxxx gave xxxx to xxxx problems xxx paper xxxxx about xxx problems xx the xxxx It xxxx states xx the xxxx might xx able xx work xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx talks xxxxx Eric xxxxx a xxxx leader xxxx analysis xxxx examining xxx case xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx are xxx issues xxxx are xxxxxxx in xxx team xx Fire xxx Lack xx unityThere xx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx amongst xxx associates xx the xxxx prepared xx Fire xxx There xx no xxxxxxx among xxx team xxxxxxxxxx which xxxxxxxxxxxx causes xxx incompetence xx performance xx the xxxxx This xx caused xxxxx Eric xxxxxx make xxxxxxxx labours xx generate x tradition xx team xxxxxxx Lack xx MotivationThe xxxxxxxxxxxx intensity xx the xxxx associates xx extremely xxx This xxx been xxxxxxxx because xx numerous xxxxxxxx faced xx the xxxxx This xx additionally xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx competence xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx group xx a xxxxxxxxxxx degree xxxx of xxxxxx understanding xxxxxxxxxx - xxxx STUDYThere xx no xxxxxxxx understanding xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxx group xxxx is xxxxx Eric xxx not xxxxxxxx the xxxx building xxxxxxxxxxxxxx efficiently xxxxx means x procedure xx building xx efficient xxxxx in xxxx stages xxx initial xxxxx acknowledged xx FORMING xxxxx that xxx team xxxxxxxxxx must xxxx a xxxxxx understanding xx work xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx Therefore x lack xx communal xxxxxxxxxxxxx would xxxxxx the xxxxxxx performance xx the xxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx backdropsEric xxxxxx a xxxx of xxxxxxx contextual xxxxxxxxx This xxx amplified xxx general xxxxxxxxxxxxx amongst xxx team xxxxxxxxxx since xxxx associate xx the xxxxx has xxxxxxx cultural xx well xx ethical xxxxxxxxxx which xxxxx rise xx disagreements xxxxxxx the xxxx associates xxx later xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx activities xx the xxxxx Superiority xxxxxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx chosen xx Eric xxx from xxxxxxxxx stages xx the xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx Randy xxxxxxx to xxx top xxxxx of xxx hierarchy xxxxx Ray xxxxxxx to xxx lower xxxxxx stage xx the xxxxxxxxx Consequently xxxx generates xxxxxxxxxxx complexes xx subordinate xxxxx workers xxxxx additionally xxxxxxx pessimistically xx the xxxxxxx performance xx the xxxxx work xxxxxxxx Biasness xxxxx methodically xxxxxxxxx the xxxx it xxxxxxx that xxxxx is xxxx judged xxxxxxxxx gaining xxxxxx his xxxxxxx before xxxxxxx as x group xxxx additionally xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx impact xx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx work xxxxxxxxxx - xxxx STUDY xxxxxxxxx condemnation xx other x viewRandy xxxxxxxxxx disapproves xx others xxxxx this xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx stage xx the xxxxxxxxx giving xxxxxxxx Therefore xxxx reduces xxx eagerness xx contribute xxxxxxx the xxxx associates xxxxx additionally xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxx performance xx the xxxxx Lack xx conflict xxxxxxxxxx skills xxxx is xxx capable xx employ xxxxxxxx resolution xxxxxxx resourcefully xxx efficiently xx determine xxx increasing xxxxxxxxx among xxx team xxxxxxxxxx This xxx led xx irritation xxxxxxx the xxxx associates xxxxx disagreements xxxxxx unsettled xxxx moreover xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx motivational xxxxx amongst xxx associates xx the xxxxx which xxxxxxxxxxxx causes xxxxxxxx incompetence xxx capable xx meet xxxxxxxxxxxxx has xxx correctly xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxx errands xxxx to xxx group xxxxxxx this xxxx has xxx completed xxx conversed xxx time xxxxxx of xxx errands xxxx the xxxxx members xxxx reduces xxx capability xx the xxxxx to xxxxxx their xxxxxxx before xxxx limits xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Lack xx rewardsThere xx no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx arrangement xx the xxxxx neither xxxxxxxxx nor xxxxxxxxxxxx this xxx reduced xxx general xxxxxxxxxxxx stage xx group xxxxxxx which xxx additionally xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx stage xx dedication xxx commitment xxxxxxx the xxxx affiliates xxxx ASSIGNMENT x CASE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx poses xx unconstructive xxxxxxxxxxx on xxx general xxxxxxxxxx of xxx group xxxx Lack xx visionThere xx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx among xxx team xxxxxxxxxx since xxxx are xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx fresh xxxxx as xxxx as xxxx are xxxxxxxxxxx not xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx novel xxx anonymous xxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxxxxxxx reduces xxx general xxxxxxxxxx of xxx group xxxx Lack xx team xxxxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxxxxx in xxx team xxx incapable xx gain xxxxxxxx and xxxx are xxxxxxxxxxx incapable xx study xxxx each xxxxx As xxx elder xxxxxxxxx in xxx group xxxxx is xxxx engaged xx leg xxxxxxx of xxx team xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx not xxxxxxxxxx his xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx to xxxxx group xxxxxxxxxx thus xxx other xxxxx members xxx incapable xx get xxxx and xxxx out xxxxx his xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Unclear xxxxx Eric xxx not xxxxxxxx allotted xxx individual xxxxxxxxx to xxx group xxxxxxx which xxx formed xxxx vagueness xxxxxxx the xxxxx members xxxx has xxxxxxxxxxxx improved xxx stage xx irritation xxxxxxx the xxxxx members xxx has xxxxx lessened xxx general xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx done xx group xxxxxxx The xxxx might xx able xx work xxxxxxxx on xxx condition xxxxxxxxxx Randy xxxx the xxxxx might xx the xxxx competent xxxxxx to xxx work xxxx Though xxxxx are xxxxx aspects xxxxx from xxxxx s xxxxx behind xxx issue xxxx if xxxx can xxxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxx the xxxxx might xxxx together xxx make xxx communal xxxxxxxxx flourish xxxx Darry xxx ASSIGNMENT x CASE xxxxxxxx must xx present xx the xxxx s xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx a xxxxxx consideration xx the xxxxx be xxxxx practical xxx dynamically xxxx part xxx pursue xxx group x evolution xxxx is xxxxx when xxx CEO xx in xxx audience xxxxx will xxxx likely xxxxxxxxxxx his xxxxxxxxxxx actions xxx business xxx must xxxx misjudging xxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx and xxxxxxx appraise xxx analysis xxxxxxxxxxx He xx as xxxx required xx recognize xxxx team xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxx in xxx business xx guarantee xxx highest xxxxxxxxxxxxx Eric xxxx make xxxxx work xxxxxxxxxx whilst xxxxxx work xx groups xxx go xxxxxx his xxxx development xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Eric xxx not xxxx to xx a xxxx team xxxxxx therefore xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx His xxxxxxxx did xxx resolve xxx present xxxxxx Every xxxxxxxxxx brought xxxxx problems xxxxx he xxx powerless xx determine xxxxxxxxxx can xx of xxx kinds xxxxx are xxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxxx In xxxx instance xxxx failed xx self-direct xxxxxxx like x good xxxxxx and xxxx decision-making xxxxxx were xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx significant xxxx of xxx team xxxxxx is xx generate xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx obligation xxxxxxx the xxxx associates xxxxx might xxx be xxxxxxxxxxx by xxxx Therefore xx added xx the xxxxx s xxxxxxxx rather xxxx resolving xxxx It xxx a xxxxxxx on xxxx of xxxx that xx could xxx relate xx the xxxx Frame xxxxx for xxx reinventing xx the xxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT x CASE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S xxx team xxxx wasn x Harvard xxxxxxxx ReviewMore Articles From Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
