Question.3131 - View the Working in Teams video ( http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/mgt420_hot-seat-videos- v1.1.php ). Before responding to the questions, view the video as many times as necessary to familiarize yourself with the characters and the issues as they relate to the objectives of this module. Write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you respond to the following questions: 1. Define the three criteria for evaluating effective team/group work (as stated in your text) and analyze whether the “team” in the video is effective or not. 2. Provide a review of Tuckman’s five stages of group formation and evaluate the stages of the individuals in the video. Explain your answer. 3. Review your text on the specific types of task, maintenance, and dysfunctional roles in teams, and identify who is playing what specific role in the video. Explain your answer. 4. Based upon what you saw in the Working in Teams video, would you say that these individuals are a group or a team? Explain your answer. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Use at least two academic resources as references for this assignment. This assignment will be graded using the "Working in Teams Video Rubric." Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Answer Below:
Introduction xxxx Criteria xxx evaluating xxxx effectiveness xxxx Team x effectiveness xxxxxxxx Page xxxxxxx s xxxx stages xx group xxxxxxxxx Page xxxxxx of xxx individuals xx video xxxx Role xxxx among xxxxxxxxxxx Page xxxxxxxxxx Team xx Group xxxx References xxxx Introduction xxxx is x set xx individuals xxxx are xxxxxxx in xx interdependent xxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx tasks xxxx are xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx as x team xxxx need xx be xxxxxxxxx on xxx another xxx co- xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx a xxxxxx goal xxxxxxxxxxxx Shams xxx Jackson xxxx effectiveness xxxxxxxx better xxxxxxx result xxx the xxxxx incurred xx also xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxx budgeted xxxxxxx delivery xxx providing xxxx quality xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx which xxx delivered xxxx in xxxxx of xxxx and xxxxxx criterions xxxx effectiveness xxxxxxxx focus xx meeting xxx long-term xxxxx of xxx organization xxxxx Criteria xxx evaluating xxxx effectivenessThere xxx many xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx team xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx among xxxx is xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxx work xxxxxx be xxxx to xxxxxxx stated xxxxx and xxxxxx achieve xxxxx goals xx the xxxxxx time xxxxx within xxxxxxx factor xxxxxx like xxxx and xxxxxx The xxxxx has xx be xx meeting xxx expectations xxx demands xx the xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx criterion xxx effectiveness xx team xxxx is xxxxxxx which xxxxxxxx for xxx need xxx teams xx work xx long-term xx projects xxxxx require xxxxxxxxxxx on x long-term xxxxx over xxxxxxxx projects xxxxx processes xxxxx to xxx processes xxx structures xxxx to xxxxx out xxx work xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx enhance xxx ability xx members xx work xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx group xxxxx Schwarz xx should xxxx towards xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx group xxxxx that xxxxxx team xxxx effectiveness xx future xxxxx tasks xxx third xxxxxxxxx is xxx personal xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx members xx the xxxx It xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx the xxxx of xxx individual xxxxxxx who xxxxxx to xxxxxxx their xxxxxxxx needs xxxxxxx the xxxxx tasks xxx individual xxxxx of xxx members xxxx an xxxxxx on xxx members xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx of xxxx life xxxxxx group xxxxx In xxx long xxx the xxxxxxxxxx needs xx the xxxxxxx need xx be xxxxx care xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx group xx improve xxxx s xxxxxxxxxxxxx CritiqueIn xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxx presented xx the xxxxx case xxxxx lacks xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx much xx desire xx terms xx effectiveness xxx individual xxxxxx like xxxxxxx manager xxxx Densen xxx a xxxxxxxxxx that xxx individual xxxxxxxx and xxxxx are xxx fully xxx by xxx team xxxxx ultimately xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx team xxxx effectiveness xxx Tanney xxxxxxx Guest xxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxx perspective xxxxxxx successful xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx which xx at xxxx with xxx focus xx other xxxx members xxxx for xxxxxxx on xxx issue xx software xxxxx according xx Joe xxxxxxxx special xxxxxxxxx while xxx others xx was xxx a xxxxxxxx issue xxxxx Mahoney xx Account xxxxxxxxxx stood xxx implementation xxx the xxxxxxxx but xxx apprehensive xxxxx the xxxxx In x way xxx team xxxxxxxxxxxxx was xxx up xx the xxxxxxxx which xxx primarily xxx to xxx lack xx match xxxxxxx individual xxx collective xxxxx Tuckman x five xxxxxx of xxxxx formationAll xxxxxx have xx undergo x number xx transformations xxxxxxx various xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx One xx such xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx has xxxx defined xx Bruce xxxxxxx who xxxxxxxxx group xxxxxxxxx into xxxx stages xxxxxxx storming xxxxxxx performing xxx adjourning xx the xxxxx stage xx forming xxx team xxxxxxx have xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx than xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx They xxxx do xxx have xxx clear xxxx regarding xxx purpose xxx direction xx the xxxx at xxxx In xxx second xxxxx of xxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx level xx conflicts xxx power xxxxxxxxx This xxxxx ultimately xxxx to xxxxxxxx of xxxx precise xxxxx of xxxxxxx in xxxxx In xxx third xxxxx of xxxxxxx team xxxxxxx initiate xxx process xx agreement xxx consensus xxxxx provides xxxxx role xxxxxxxx among xxxx members xxx fourth xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx involves xxxxxxx clear xxxxx and xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx goals xxx for xxx team xxx fifth xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx involves xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx systems xx recognize xxxx performance xxxxx team xxxxxxx Nelson xxx Quick xxxxxx of xxx individuals xx videoThe xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx video xxx in xxx various xxxxxx of xxxxx transformations xxxxx Mahoney xx Account xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxx in xxx first xxxxx of xxxxxxx wherein xx is xx conflict xxxx the xxxxx proposed xx Joe xxxxxx Special xxxxx Manager xxxxxxxxxxxx he xxxx plays xxx second xxxxx role xx his xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxx wherein xx attempts xx impose xxx powers xxx wants xxx ideas xx prevail xxxx him xxx leaves xxx team xxxxxxx without xxxxx conclusion xxxx is xxxxxxx his xxx towards xxx third xxxxx of xxxxxxx where xx is xxxxxx to xxx his xxxxx and xxxxxx some xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx related xx his xxxx Rosa xx working xx the xxxxx stage xxxxxxx she xx having xxxxxxxxx with xxx team xxxxxx Joe xxxxxxx her xxxxxxxxx are xxx expressed xx a xxxxxx manner xxx is xxxxxxx in xxx fourth xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx wherein xx is xxxxxxx performance xxxxxxx for xxx team xxx reconciling xxxxxxxxxxx Role xxxx among xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tenney xxxxx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx team xxxx He xxxx agenda xx bring xxx individual xxxxxxx on xxx same xxxx He xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx members xx taking xxxxx queries xxx motivating xxxx Cheng xxxx is xxx questioner xx the xxxx as xx sets xxxxx asking xxxxxxxxxx positive xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx offers xxxxxxxxxxxx criticism xxxx Densen xxxxx the xxxx of xx individualist xxx does xxx play xxx role xx an xxxxxx team xxxxxx She xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx as xx unnecessary xxxx and xxxxx it xx get xxxx for xxx other xxxxx Simon xxxxxxx plays xxx role xx a xxxxx who xx looking xx criticize xxxx Joe xxx Cheng xxxxx himself xxx accepting xxx responsibility xx shows xxxxxxxx not xx follow xxxxx decisions xxx Group xxxxxxxxxx Team xx Group xxxxx on xxx details xxxxxxxx in xxx Working xx Teams xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx are x group xxx not x team xxx shared xxxx or xxxxx are xxx difference xxxxxxx a xxxx and xxxxx Hardingham xxx individuals xx the xxxxx do xxx share xxx work xxx the xxxx goals xxxx have xxxxx differences xxxxxxx themselves xxxxxxxxx goals xxx the xxxxx to xxxxxxx them xxxxx is x lack xx cohesiveness xxx understanding xxxxx the xxxxx in xxx minds xx the xxxxxxxxxxx So xxx individuals xx the xxxxx shall xx considered xx a xxxxx but xxx as x team xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxx in xxxxx CIPD xxxxxxxxxx Nelson x amp xxxxx J xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Behavior xxxxxxx the xxxx World xxx You xxxxxxx Learning xxx Group x d xxxx Roles xxx Group xxxxxxxxxxxxx Retrieved xxxx http xxx pgagroup xxx team-roles xxxxxxxxx M xxx Jackson x Developments xx Work xxx Organization xxxxxxxxxx Implications xxx International xxxxxxxx Emerald xxxxx Publishing xxxxxxx R xxx Skilled xxxxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxxxxxxx Resource xxx Consultants xxxxxxxxxxxx Managers xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx John xxxxx amp xxxx Testa x Growing xxxxxxxx No xxxxxx PressMore Articles From English