Question.3207 - REPORT ON HYDROPNEUMATIC SUSPENSION FOR TRACTOR IMPLEMENT
Answer Below:
This xx a xxxxxx in xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxx pneumatic xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxx implementation xxx deriving xxx conclusions xxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx parameters xxxx been xxxxxxxxx in xxx NP xxxxxxx Business xxxx The xxxxx initiative xxx taken xx Latvia xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx support xxx been xxxxxxxx by xxx European xxxxxxxxxx Fund xxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Studies xx Latvia xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx realized xx the xxxxxxx Department xx Latvia xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Due xx the xxxxxxxx pulsation xx the xxxxxxxxx hitch xxxxxx oscillations xxxx place xxxxxxxxxx in xxx rough xxxx surfaces xxxxx oscillations xx reduced xx pressure xxxxxxxxxxx damping xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx control xxx modern xxxxxxx linkage xxxxxx equipped xxxx oscillation xxxxxx and xxxxx pneumatic xxxxxxxxxxxx shall xxxxx for xxxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx The xxxx purpose xx this xxxxxxxxxx was xx deduce xxx possibility xx tractor xxxxx system xx terms xx stiffness xxx damping xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx was xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx boom xxxxxxxx model xxxxxxx weight xxx connecting xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx accumulators xx the xxxxxxxxxxx two xxxxxxxxx charged xxxxxxx type xxxxxxxxx accumulators xxxx employed xxxxxxxxxxx capacity xx defined xx the xxxxxxxxx of xxx pre- xxxxxx pressure xxxxx should xx lower xxxx the xxxxxxx pressure xx the xxxxxxxxx system xxxx accumulator xx pre-charged xxxx nitrogen xxx maximum xxxxxxxxx temperature xxxx be xxxxxxxxxx using xxx recommended xxxxx because xxx volume xx the xxx increases xx temperature xxxxxxxxx While xxxxxxxxxx experiments xxx diaphragm xxxx not xxxxx the xxxxx side xxx pressure xx the xxxxxxxxx accumulator xxxxxxxxx according xx the xxxxxx Marriot xxx Nine xxxxxxx pressure xxxxxx are xxxx in xxx three xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Average xxxxxx were xxxxxxxxxx from xxxxxx seven xxxxxxxx values xx the xxxxxxxxxx value xx for xxxx value xxxxxxxxxxx evaluation xxx two xxxxxxxxxx which xxxx employed xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx Change xx pressure xxxxxxxx Change xx speed xx which xxx tractor xx put xxxx force xxx results xx interpreted xxxx been xxxx charted xxx plotted xx order xx gain x better xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx more xxxxxxx of xxx operation xxx results xx revealed xx the xxxxxxxxxx shows xxxx the xxxxx system xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx allows xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx characteristics xx the xxxxxxxxx cylinder xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx oscillation xxxxxxxxx which xx reduced xxxx driving xx the xxxx pressure xx MPa xxx driving xx the xxxx pressure xxx till xxxx different xxxxxxx hydro xxxxxxxxx accumulators xxx used xxxxxxxxxx the xxxx pressure xxxx MPa xxx maximum xxxxxxxxx pressure xxxxxxx reduction xx the xxxxxxx speed xx h- xxx obtained xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx was xxxxxx with xxxxx or xxx MPa xxxxxxx diaphragm xxxxxxxxxxxx But xx the xxxx tire xxxxxxxx and xx the xxxxxxx speed xx h- xxxxxxxxx pressure xxxxxxx reduction xxx obtained xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx was xxxxxx with xxx MPa xxx two xxx charged xxxxxxxxx accumulators xxx overall xxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxxx but xxx a xxxxxxx insight xxxxxxx parameters xxxx to xx altered xx order xx understand xxx configuration xxxx the xxxxxx more xxxxxxx References xxxxxxxxx Pirs xxxxxxxxx Melta xxxxxxxxx Metla xxxxxxxxxxxxxx SUSPENSION xxx TRACTOR xxxxxxxxx Latvia xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx KONEKESKO xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Technique xxxxxxMore Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
