Question.826 - Part 1: Initial PostPost the draft of your essay using the template: Argumentative Paper Format and Outline TemplateDownload Argumentative Paper Format and Outline Template Part 2: Responses to Peers (Peer Review)The second part of the peer review and the most important part is the review of other learners' essays. Each essay is made up of multiple parts. In order to have a strong essay, each part must be logical and effective. In many cases, essays will be written with a strong thesis, but the rest of the paper will be lacking, making the paper ineffective. An essay is only as strong as its weakest point.One of the most important steps for creating a strong essay is to have others review it. By completing a peer review you will be able to create a better thesis statement and supporting arguments. Using a checklist will allow you to focus your review and to rate each of the parts.There are many different peer review checklists, but the one below should be helpful for your assignment. Be sure to address as many questions as possible with your peer review. Is the thesis clear? Does the author use his or her own ideas in the thesis and argument? Is the significance of the problem in the paper explained? Is the significance compelling? Are the ideas developed logically and thoroughly? Does the author use ethos effectively? Does the author use pathos effectively? Are different viewpoints acknowledged? Are objections effectively handled? Does the author give adequate explanations about the sources used? Are the sources well-integrated into the paper, or do they seem to be added in just for the sake of adding sources? Is the word choice specific, concrete, and interesting? Are the sentences clear? Is the overall organization of the argument effective? Are the transitions between paragraphs smooth? Are there any grammatical errors? After you have posted your own essay to the Discussion assignment, post at least two substantive responses addressing all of the questions above.The bulk of the work in this week's discussion will be done with your replies to your peers and the points do reflect that in the rubric.
Answer Below:
Based xx the xxxxxxxx received xxxx instructor xxxxx on xxx feedback xxxxxxxx from xxx instructor xxx argumentative xxxxx should xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx related xx the xxxxx rather xxxx being x pro-con xxxxx Rhetorical xxxxxxx I xxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx ethos xx citing xxxxxxxx sources xxx experts xx science xxxxxxx I xxxx use xxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx aspect xx why xxxxxxxxx science xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx such xx fostering xxxxxx engagement xxx reducing xxxxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxx use xxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx data xxx evidence xx support xx arguments xxxxxx Statement x will xxxxxx my xxxxxx statement xx present x clear xxxxxxxxxxxxx stance xxxxx on xx instructor's xxxxxxxx I xxxx focus xx offering x counterargument xxxxx not x pro xxx paper xx revised xxxxxx statement xx Effective xxxxxxx science xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxx training xxx cultural xxxxxxxxxxx can xxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx Claims x will xxxxx that xxxxxxx writing xx critical xx fostering x better xxxxxx understanding xx science xxx bridging xxx gap xxxxxxx scientists xxx underrepresented xxxxxxxxxxx Highlights xxx significance xx writing xxx conceptual xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx and xxx importance xx training xx science xxxxxxx I xxxx argue xxxx inclusive xxx culturally xxxxxxxxx science xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx diverse xxxxxxxxx Counterargument xxx Rebuttal x possible xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxx there xxx be xxxxxx ways xx reach xxx public xxxx science xxxxxxx as xxxx people xxx be xxxx visually xxxxxxxx I xxxx address xxxx counterargument xx explaining xxxx science xxxxxxx is xxxxx an xxxxxxxxx part xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx process xxx that xx is xxx an xxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx Still xxxxxxxxx different xxxxxxx such xx videos xxx illustrations xxx be xxxx effective x hope xx present x compelling xxx well-supported xxxxxxxx in xx paper xxxx nbsp xxxxMore Articles From English