Question.1937 - PersonalityIt is a given that a lot of information available on the Internet is inaccurate or misleading. Manyof the most egregious examples of “bad science” and information “illiteracy” on the web relatesto personality measures. “Authoritative” websites seem to exist everywhere, all of which promiseto help a person interpret behavioral patterns, predict preferences, achieve more successfulrelationships, and lead a more fulfilling life. Although much of the content on these sites standsin stark contrast to the scientific psychological literature, many of the personality websitesprovide engaging (and even humorous) case studies of how some people conceptualizepersonality; they also try to measure it and use personality indexes to predict psychologicaloutcomes.You are to take three personality tests and assess the extent to which these tests accuratelymeasure your personality. In each case, you should do some research as to whether thesemeasures are well accepted in the scientific community.1. Enneagram Personality Test (http://similarminds.com/test.html(http://similarminds.com/test.html) )2. Myers-Briggs Type test (http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes1.htm(http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes1.htm) ) An interpretation of this test can befound at: http://www.personalitypage.com/high-level.html(http://www.personalitypage.com/high-level.html)3. Big Five Personality Measure (http://www.personalityassessor.com/bigfive(http://www.personalityassessor.com/bigfive) )For the paper you should:Take each testDiscuss the degree to which the test captured your personalityDescribe the criticism of each test as described by researchers. For this section, you willneed to seek out and discuss this criticism. Make sure to cite and reference this material inAPA format.I suggest you break your paper into three parts corresponding to each of the three tests. Makesure to infuse some course content into your paper. A good rule of thumb is that it should be18/07/2023, 13:10Application Assignment #4https://worldclassroom.webster.edu/courses/1440863/assignments/68618862/2readily apparent from reading your paper that you took an Introduction to Psychology course. Ifit isn’t easy to see you may want to make some changes.Papers should be typed with 1-inch margins, double-spacing, and normal-sized font (such asyou see here – 12pt). The paper should be approximately 3-4 pages in length plus your titlepage and reference page (in APA format). Please use MS Word or a PDF to submit papers.
Answer Below:
Enneagram xxxxxxxxxxx Test xxxx Source xxxxx similarminds xxx cgi-bin xxxxxxxxxxxx pl xxxx The xxxxxxxxx is x personality xxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx individuals xxxx one xx nine xxxxxxxxxx tendencies xxxx type xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxx set xx motivations xxx core xxxxxxx aiming xx provide xxxxxxxx into xxx people xxxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx situations xxx test xxxx to xxxxxxxx which xxxx best xxxxxx with xx individual's xxxxxxxx traits xxx core xxxxxxxxxxx Based xx my xxxxxxxxx test xxxxxxx my xxxxxxx score xxx in xxxx the xxxxxxxx Focus xxxx followed xxxxxxx by xxxx the xxxxx Focus xxxx and xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx type xxxxx results xxxxxxxx with xx personality xx I xx tend xx prioritize xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx seeking xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx aspects xx life xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxx a xxxxxx to xx successful xxx achieve xxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxxx also xxxxxxxxx spontaneity xxx seeking xxxxxxxxxx Type xxx Enneagram xxxx seems xx have xxxxxxxx significant xxxxxxx of xx personality xxxx as xx concerns xxxxx security xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx spirit xxxxx elements xxxxx well xxxx my xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx I xxxxxxxx life xxxxxxx it xx important xx note xxxx the xxxxxxxxx like xxxxx typology-based xxxxx presents x generalized xxxxxxxxx that xxx not xxxxx encapsulate xxx complexities xx an xxxxxxxxxxxx personality xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx of xxx Enneagram xxxxx that xxx basis xx ancient xxxxxxxxx teachings xxxxx empirical xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx validation xxxxxxxxxx amp xxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx typology xxxxxx often xxxxxxx vague xxx subject xx interpretation xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx test xxxxxxx Moreover xxx categorization xx individuals xxxx distinct xxxxx might xxxxxxxxxxxx human xxxxxxxx ignoring xxx dynamic xxx multifaceted xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx As x result xxxxx is x caution xxxxxxx using xxx Enneagram xx a xxxxxxxxxx tool xxx psychological xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Myers-Briggs xxxx Test xxxx Source xxxxx www xxxxxxxxxxxx com xxxxxxxxxxx enfj-type x MRenx xxxx FBcBUpPhMmBh- xxx n xxx Nhs xxxxxxxxx ml xx UpIAm xxxxxxxxxxxxxx RqMgrFuyHzAmAt xxxxx Rnmpm xxx nbsp xxx Myers-Briggs xxxx Indicator xxxx is x widely xxxx personality xxxxxxxxxx tool xxxxx on xxxx Jung's xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx types xx categorizes xxxxxxxxxxx into xxx of xxxxxxx personality xxxxx each xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxx combination xx four xxxxxxxxxxx Extraversion x vs xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx S xx Intuition x Thinking x vs xxxxxxx F xxx Judging x vs xxxxxxxxxx P xxx test xxxx to xxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxxxx preferences xx these xxxx dimensions xxxxxxxxx insights xxxx their xxxxxxxxxxx traits xxx preferred xxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx According xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxx results x am xxxxxxxxxx as xx ENFJ xxxxxxxxxxx Intuitive xxxxxxx Judging xxxx classification xxxxxx well xxxx my xxxxxxxxxxx as x tend xx be xxxxxxxx empathetic xxx highly xxxxx interpersonal xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx Extraversion xxx Feeling xxxxxxxxxxxx my xxxxxxxxxxx towards xxxxxxxxx allows xx to xxxxxxxx patterns xxx future xxxxxxxxxxxxx complemented xx my xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Judging xxx Myers-Briggs xxxx Test xxx captured xxxxxxxxxxx aspects xx my xxxxxxxxxxx such xx my xxxxxxxx nature xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx decision-making xxxxx characteristics xxxxxx resonate xxxx how x perceive xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx with xxxxxx However xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx that xxx MBTI xxx both xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx with xxxxxxx surrounding xxx validity xxx reliability xx a xxxxxxxxxx measure xx personality xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx argue xxxx the xxxx has xxxxxxx limitations xxx concerns xxxxxxxxx One xxxxx criticism xx its xxxxxxxxxxx nature xx it xxxxxx individuals xxxx binary xxxxxxxxxx and xxx overlook xxx continuum xx personality xxxxxx Moreover xxx test-retest xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx MBTI xxx been xxxxxxxxxx as xxxx individuals xxxxxxx different xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx testing xxx theoretical xxxxx of xxx MBTI xxx also xxxxx scrutiny xxxx concerns xxxxx its xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx personality xxxxxxxx Critics xxxxxxx that xxx MBTI xxxxx solid xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx its xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx validity xxx often xxxxxxxxxxxxxx complex xxxxx behavior xxxxxxxxx Big xxxx Personality xxxxxxx nbsp xxxxxx https xxx personalityassessor xxx bigfive xxxx The xxx Five xxxxxxxxxxx Measure xxxx known xx the xxxxxxxxxxx Model xx a xxxxxx accepted xxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxxx categorizes xxxxxxxxxxx into xxxx broad xxxxxxxxxxx dimensions xxxxx dimensions xxxxxxx Extraversion xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conscientiousness xxxxxxxxxxx sometimes xxxxxx Emotional xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx The xxxx aims xx measure xx individual's xxxxx of xxxx dimension xxxxxxxxx insights xxxx their xxxxxxxxxxx traits xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Based xx the xxx Five xxxxxxxxxxx Measure xxxxxxx my xxxxxx are xx follows xxxxxxxxxxxx Agreeableness xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Neuroticism xxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxx scores xxxxxxxx that x have xxxxxxxxxx high xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conscientiousness xxx Openness xxxxx scoring xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx on xxxxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxxx that x am xxxxxxxx cooperative xxxxxxxxxxx open-minded xxx emotionally xxxxxx The xxx Five xxxx appears xx capture xxx aspects xx my xxxxxxxxxxx accurately x do xxxxxxxxx myself xx a xxxxxx who xxxxxx harmony xxxxx responsibilities xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx exploring xxx ideas xxx experiences xxxxxxxx my xxxxxxxxxx low xxxxxxxxxxx score xxxxxx with xx tendency xx remain xxxx and xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx situations xxxxx the xxxx provides x useful xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx personality xxxxxx it xx essential xx acknowledge xxxx no xxxx can xxxxx encapsulate xxx richness xxx complexity xx an xxxxxxxxxxxx personality xxxxxxx of xxx Big xxxx test xxxxx that xxx model xxx not xxxxxxxxx all xxxxxxx of xxxxx personality xxxxxxxxxxx missing xxxxxxxxxx specific xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx nuances xxxxx Some xxxxxxxxxxx question xxx universality xx the xxx Five xxxxxx different xxxxxxxx suggesting xxxx it xxxxx be xxxxxx toward xxxxxxx concepts xx personality xxxxxxxx while xxx Big xxxx factors xxxxx valuable xxxxxxxx they xxxxx not xxxxx address xxxxxxx changes xxx variations xx behavior xxxx time xxxxxxxxx caution xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx the xxx Five xx the xxxx measure xx personality xxx complementing xx with xxxxx assessments xxx offer x more xxxxxxxxxxxxx understanding xxxx nbsp xxxx ReferencesHilsenroth x J xxx Segal x L xxx Comprehensive xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxxx Vol xxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxxx Wiley xxx Sons xxx Hogan x Personality xxx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx Psychology xxxxx Pittenger x J xxxxxxxxxx Comments xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxxxxxxx Consulting xxxxxxxxxx Journal xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx nbspMore Articles From Psychology
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
