Question.811 - In the Evolutionary Psychology & Gender Mini Lecture, I talk a lot about what the traditional evolutionary psychological ideas have been with regard to gender (e.g. men try to reproduce with as many women as possible and avoid investing in any one child; women try to find reliable men who will be monogamous, loyal, and who WILL invest in the few children they bear during their reproductive years). The Gettler et al. article is an example of more modern scholarship in this area that complicates these traditional ideas and suggests that human males may be more "wired" to care for children than we previously thought. Please read the article, which can be found here Download here. Then, please answer the following questions: When they talk about “T,” what are they referring to? (1 point) Is this study correlational/observational or experimental? Why? (3 points) Why is this considered a longitudinal study? (2 points) How many men are in the sample? (1 point) In what country did this study take place? (1 point) The authors used data from a health survey and also went “into the field” and collected testosterone samples from men who had participated in the health survey. What was the survey called? (1 point) The authors hypothesized that men with higher T at the beginning of the study would be more likely to “partner” (because men with higher testosterone tend to be more successful at finding a partner and producing children). Did they find support for this hypothesis? (2 points) The authors also hypothesized that men who became fathers would see a decrease in their T after the birth of their babies. The idea is that men's - not just women's - bodies might be "wired" to adapt hormonally to taking care of babies. Lower T means a more nurturing, less aggressive father. Did they find support for this hypothesis? (2 points) Finally, the authors hypothesized that men who spent more time caring for their children would see an even steeper decline in T. The idea is that human bodies respond biologically to events in their environment, and time spent caring for a baby might be negatively correlated with testosterone. (In other words, it's a snowball effect - the more you care for a baby, the more nurturing/less aggressive you get.) Did they find support for this hypothesis? (2 points) Finally, do the results of this study surprise you? Why or why not? (3 points) Bonus question, worth up to 3 points: Why was it important that this study be longitudinal (studying the same people over a long period of time) rather than cross-sectional (comparing the testosterone of a group of men who haven't become fathers yet to a group of men who have already become fathers)?
Answer Below:
T xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxxxx observational xxxxxxx the xxxxx analyzes xxxx that xxx already xxxx collected xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx are xxx manipulating xxx variables xx measure xxx outcomes xx looks xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx Testosterone xxx fatherhood xxxxxxx using xxx independent xxxxxxxxx This xx considered x longitudinal xxxxx because xx looked xx the xxxx group xx men xxxx several xxxxx tracking xxxxx testosterone xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx status xxxxxxxxxx There xxxx men xx the xxxxxx The xxxxx took xxxxx in xxx Philippines xxx survey xxx called xx Cebu xxxxxxxxxxxx Health xxx Nutrition xxxxxx CLHNS xxx the xxxxxxx found xxxxxxx for xxxx hypothesis xxxx found xxxx men xxxx higher xxxxxxxxxxxx at xxx beginning xx the xxxxx were xxxx likely xx partner xxx also xxxx likely xx become xxxxxxx Yes xxx authors xxxxx support xxx this xxxxxxxxxx They xxxxx that xxx who xxxxxx fathers xxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx in xxxxx Testosterone xxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxx babies xxx they xxxxx support xxx this xxxxxxxxxx They xxxxx that xxx who xxxxx more xxxx caring xxx their xxxxxxxx had x steeper xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx levels xxx results xx this xxxxx do xxx surprise xx This xx because x am xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx that xxxxx that xxx can xxxx experience x decrease xx Testosterone xxxx they xxxxxx fathers xxxx study xxx an xxxxxxxx addition xx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxx because xx used xxxxxxxxxxxx data xx track xxxxxxxxxxxx levels xxxx time xxxxx provides xxxx concrete xxxxxxxx that xxxx hormonal xxxxx is xxxxxx occurring xxxxx Question xx was xxxxxxxxx for xxxx study xx be xxxxxxxxxxxx because xx allowed xxx researchers xx track xxx changes xx testosterone xxxxxx over xxxx and xxx if xxxxx were xxxxxxx in xxx levels xx Testosterone xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx a xxxxxx Comparing xxx Testosterone xx a xxxxx of xxx who xxxxxxx become xxxxxxx yet xx a xxxxx of xxx who xxxx already xxxxxx fathers xxxxx not xx able xx provide xxxxxxxxxxx about xxx changes xx Testosterone xxxx occurred xxxxx the xxx became xxxxxxxMore Articles From Psychology