Question.2316 - It is a given that a lot of information available on the Internet is inaccurate or misleading. Many of the most egregious examples of “bad science” and information “illiteracy” on the web relates to personality measures. “Authoritative” websites seem to exist everywhere, all of which promise to help a person interpret behavioral patterns, predict preferences, achieve more successful relationships, and lead a more fulfilling life. Although much of the content on these sites stands in stark contrast to the scientific psychological literature, many of the personality websites provide engaging (and even humorous) case studies of how some people conceptualize personality; they also try to measure it and use personality indexes to predict psychological outcomes. You are to take three personality tests and assess the extent to which these tests accurately measure your personality. In each case, you should do some research as to whether these measures are well accepted in the scientific community. 1. Enneagram Personality Test (http://similarminds.com/test.html (http://similarminds.com/test.html) ) 2. Myers-Briggs Type test (http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes1.htm (http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes1.htm) ) An interpretation of this test can be found at: http://www.personalitypage.com/high-level.html (http://www.personalitypage.com/high-level.html) 3. Big Five Personality Measure (http://www.personalityassessor.com/bigfive (http://www.personalityassessor.com/bigfive) ) For the paper you should: Take each test Discuss the degree to which the test captured your personality Describe the criticism of each test as described by researchers. For this section, you will need to seek out and discuss this criticism. Make sure to cite and reference this material in APA format. I suggest you break your paper into three parts corresponding to each of the three tests. Make sure to infuse some course content into your paper. A good rule of thumb is that it should be18/07/2023, 13:10 Application Assignment #4https://worldclassroom.webster.edu/courses/1440863/assignments/6861886 2/2 readily apparent from reading your paper that you took an Introduction to Psychology course. If it isn’t easy to see you may want to make some changes. Papers should be typed with 1-inch margins, double-spacing, and normal-sized font (such as you see here – 12pt). The paper should be approximately 3-4 pages in length plus your title page and reference page (in APA format). Please use MS Word or a PDF to submit papers.
Answer Below:
Enneagram xxxxxxxxxxx TestSource xxxxx similarminds xxx cgi-bin xxxxxxxxxxxx plThe xxxxxxxxx is x personality xxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx individuals xxxx one xx nine xxxxxxxxxx tendencies xxxx type xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxx set xx motivations xxx core xxxxxxx aiming xx provide xxxxxxxx into xxx people xxxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx situations xxx test xxxx to xxxxxxxx which xxxx best xxxxxx with xx individual x dominant xxxxxx and xxxx motivations xxxxx on xx Enneagram xxxx results xx highest xxxxx was xx Type xxx quot xxxxxxxx Focus xxxx type xxxxxxxx closely xx Type xxx quot xxxxx Focus xxxx type xxx Type xxx quot xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx quot xxxx These xxxxxxx resonate xxxx my xxxxxxxxxxx as x do xxxx to xxxxxxxxxx safety xxx security xxxxxxx assurance xx various xxxxxxx of xxxx Additionally x have x desire xx be xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx recognition xxxx while xxxx embracing xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx excitement xxxx The xxxxxxxxx test xxxxx to xxxx captured xxxxxxxxxxx aspects xx my xxxxxxxxxxx such xx my xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxx ambition xxx recognition xxx adventurous xxxxxx These xxxxxxxx align xxxx with xx self-perception xxx how x navigate xxxx However xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxx that xxx Enneagram xxxx other xxxxxxxxxxxxxx tests xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx framework xxxx may xxx fully xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xx individual x personality xxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx of xxx Enneagram xxxxx that xxx basis xx ancient xxxxxxxxx teachings xxxxx empirical xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx validation xxxxxxxxxx amp xxxxx The xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxx system xxxxx appears xxxxx and xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxxx leading xx inconsistency xxx inaccuracies xx the xxxx results xxxxxxxx its xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxx types xxxxx oversimplify xxxxx behavior xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx nature xx personality xx a xxxxxx there xx a xxxxxxx against xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx as x definitive xxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxx decision-making xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxxxxxxxx https xxx humanmetrics xxx personality xxxxx type x MRenx xxxx FBcBUpPhMmBh- xxx n xxx Nhs xxxxxxxxx ml xx UpIAm xxxxxxxxxxxxxx RqMgrFuyHzAmAt xxxxx Rnmpm xxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxxxxxxx MBTI xx a xxxxxx used xxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxxx based xx Carl xxxx s xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx types xx categorizes xxxxxxxxxxx into xxx of xxxxxxx personality xxxxx each xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxx combination xx four xxxxxxxxxxx Extraversion x vs xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx S xx Intuition x Thinking x vs xxxxxxx F xxx Judging x vs xxxxxxxxxx P xxx test xxxx to xxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx four xxxxxxxxxx providing xxxxxxxx into xxxxx personality xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx ways xx thinking xxx behaving xxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT xxxxxxxxx to xxx Myers-Briggs xxxx Test xxxxxxx I xx classified xx an xxxx Extraverted xxxxxxxxx Feeling xxxxxxx This xxxxxxxxxxxxxx aligns xxxx with xx personality xx I xxxx to xx outgoing xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx value xxxxxxxxxxxxx connections xxx harmony xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx Additionally xx inclination xxxxxxx intuition xxxxxx me xx perceive xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx possibilities xxxxxxxxxxxx by xx preference xxx structure xxx planning xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxx has xxxxxxxx significant xxxxxxx of xx personality xxxx as xx outgoing xxxxxx empathy xxx preference xxx structured xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx These xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx indeed xxxxxxxx with xxx I xxxxxxxx myself xxx interact xxxx others xxxxxxx it xx essential xx recognize xxxx the xxxx has xxxx supporters xxx critics xxxx debates xxxxxxxxxxx its xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx as x scientific xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Researchers xxx critics xxxxx that xxx MBTI xxx several xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Pittenger xxx major xxxxxxxxx is xxx dichotomous xxxxxx as xx forces xxxxxxxxxxx into xxxxxx categories xxx may xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx traits xxxxxxxx the xxxxx retest xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx MBTI xxx been xxxxxxxxxx as xxxx individuals xxxxxxx different xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx testing xxx theoretical xxxxx of xxx MBTI xxx also xxxxx scrutiny xxxx concerns xxxxx its xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx personality xxxxxxxx Critics xxxxxxx that xxx MBTI xxxxx solid xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx its xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx validity xxx often xxxxxxxxxxxxxx complex xxxxx behavior xxxxxxxxx Big xxxx Personality xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT xxxxxx https xxx personalityassessor xxx bigfive xxx Big xxxx Personality xxxxxxx also xxxxx as xxx Five-Factor xxxxx is x widely xxxxxxxx personality xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx individuals xxxx five xxxxx personality xxxxxxxxxx These xxxxxxxxxx include xxxxxxxxxxxx Agreeableness xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Neuroticism xxxxxxxxx called xxxxxxxxx Stability xxx Openness xx Experience xxx test xxxx to xxxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxx s xxxxx of xxxx dimension xxxxxxxxx insights xxxx their xxxxxxxxxxx traits xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Based xx the xxx Five xxxxxxxxxxx Measure xxxxxxx my xxxxxx are xx follows xxxxxxxxxxxx Agreeableness xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Neuroticism xxxxxxxx These xxxxxx indicate xxxx I xxxx relatively xxxx levels xx Agreeableness xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx while xxxxxxx moderately xx Extraversion xxx low xx Neuroticism xxxx suggests xxxx I xx sociable xxxxxxxxxxx responsible xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx stable xxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT xxx Big xxxx test xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx key xxxxxxx of xx personality xxxxxxxxxx I xx recognize xxxxxx as x person xxx values xxxxxxx takes xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx seriously xxx enjoys xxxxxxxxx new xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Moreover xx relatively xxx Neuroticism xxxxx aligns xxxx my xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx calm xxx composed xx stressful xxxxxxxxxx While xxx test xxxxxxxx a xxxxxx framework xxx understanding xxxxxxxxxxx traits xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx that xx test xxx fully xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx of xx individual x personality xxxxxxx of xxx Big xxxx test xxxxx that xxx model xxx not xxxxxxxxx all xxxxxxx of xxxxx personality xxxxxxxxxxx missing xxxxxxxxxx specific xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx nuances xxxxx Some xxxxxxxxxxx question xxx universality xx the xxx Five xxxxxx different xxxxxxxx suggesting xxxx it xxxxx be xxxxxx toward xxxxxxx concepts xx personality xxxxxxxx while xxx Big xxxx factors xxxxx valuable xxxxxxxx they xxxxx not xxxxx address xxxxxxx changes xxx variations xx behavior xxxx time xxxxxxxxx caution xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx the xxx Five xx the xxxx measure xx personality xxx complementing xx with xxxxx assessments xxx offer x more xxxxxxxxxxxxx understanding xxxxxxxxxxx ASSIGNMENT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx M x amp xxxxx D x Eds xxxxxxxxxxxxx handbook xx psychological xxxxxxxxxx Vol xxxxxxxxxxx assessment xxxx Wiley xxx Sons xxx Hogan x Personality xxx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx Psychology xxxxx Pittenger x J xxxxxxxxxx Comments xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Type xxxxxxxxx Consulting xxxxxxxxxx Journal xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxMore Articles From Psychology
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
