Question.960 - History 115-7440 Spring Semester 2023 Professor Oscar Cañedo Guidelines for JSTOR Review Assignment For this assignment, you are to read a journal article about a topic related to a regional topic within the context of the class, and you are asked to use articles from the JSTOR database. Unfortunately, Grossmont College does not have JSTOR available from its library, but some of you may have used JSTOR from institutions like Mesa, Palomar and Southwestern Colleges, in addition to San Diego State or Cal State San Marcos. Therefore I have provided you with an ample selection of articles that I have downloaded from Palomar College's JSTOR database. All you need to do is pick any of the articles for your review. Just click the "Files" section from the Canvas class menu, and open the folder that says "115_JSTOR_Articles." Inside the folder are several subfolders with topics arranged by nation, in alphabetical order. The articles are in PDF format and labeled by the topic of the article, so just browse the collection of articles before you make your final selection. You do not need to notify me of your article choice, just pick any one of the articles in any of those subfolders, and you're ready to roll! The due date for this review is Tuesday, May 23 at 11:59 PM. Late reviews will be accepted through May 26, with a one-grade late deduction added to your score. The report is to be 5-7 pages in length. Please be sure to use both a title page and works cited page. (title and works cited pages do not count toward the overall page count of your review) You are also encouraged to follow the MLA or Chicago formats to develop this report. Please double-space your review. This review will count as 20% toward your final grade. And in your works cited page, please list the name of the article that you will be summarizing and analyzing. This an example of the type of the format you should follow: “Argentina in 1983: Reflections on the Language of the Military and George Orwell," by Alberto Ciria. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Vol. 11, No. 21 (1986), pp. 57-69. In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points that the author is trying to convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type of article is this? Is the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background?As for the second point of discussion, this is where you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You are definitely encouraged to write in first person singular (I feel that..., I think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your JSTOR review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 & 1⁄2 pages summary and 1 & 1⁄2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.
Answer Below:
Fadi xxxxx Professor xxxxx CanedoCourse xxxx rd xxx JSTOR xxxxxxx Review xxxxxxxxxx Works xxxxx Ram xxx Rafael x V xxxx I xxxx a-Toro xxx Luis xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Men xxxxxx out xx Puerto xxxx Caribbean xxxxxxx - xxxxxxx Considering xxx research xxxxx explores xxx societal xxxxxxxxx on x particular xxxxxx wherein xxx in xxxxxx Rico xxxx to xxxxxxxxxx backlashes xxx to xxx disparity xx their xxxxxx identity xxxx is x research xxxxx rather xxxx a xxx article xxxxx they xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx methodology xxx participants xxxxxxxx in xxxxx to xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx factors xx masculinity xxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxx also xxxxxxxx how xxx participants xxxxx are xxxxx of xxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxxx and xxx one xxxxxxxxx with xxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx an xxxxxxxx take xx societal xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx behavior xxxxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx networks xxxx of xxx intriguing xxxxxx discussed xx the xxxxxxxx include x societal xxxxxxxxxxx on xxx masculinity xx satisfied xxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx wherein xxx of xxxxxxxxxxx who xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx research xxx results xxxx that x majority xx percentage xxxxxxxxx satisfaction xxxx their xxxxxx identity xxxx being xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx recorded xxxx satisfied xxx some xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx reporting xxxxx satisfied xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx tends xx explore xxx sexual xxxxxxxxxxxx awareness xx a xxxxxxxxxx gender xxx research xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx factor xx sexual xxxxxxxxxx and xx resulted xx depicting xxx different xxxxxx of xxx becoming xxxxx while x considerable xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx responded xxxx their xxxxxx preference xx the xxx of xxxx even xxxxxxx but xxx important xxxxxxx of xxx research xxx childhood xxxxxx exploration xxx play xxxx common xxxxxxxxxxx by xxx majority xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Thirdly xxx reactional xxxxxxxxx of xxx participants xx terms xx sexual xxxxxxxxxxx whereby xxx results xxxxxxxx a xxxxx state xx understanding xx the xxxxxxxx recorded xxxx of xxx behavioral xxxxxxxx of xxx respondents xxxxxxx they xxxxxxxxx signs xx fear xxxxxxxxx guilt xx shame xxxxx a xxx depicted x sense xx happiness xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx who xxxx not xxxxxxx to xxxxxx personal xxxxxxx but xxxxx to xxxx their xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx as x heterosexual xxxxxxx intention xx hide xxx stereotypical xxxxxxxx behavior xxxxxxx homosexual xxxxxxxxxx during xxx early x and xxxxxxxx exerted xx a xxxxxxxxxx gender xxxxxxx societal xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering xxx disclosure xx sexual xxxxxxxxxx another xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx intended xxx disclosure xx sexual xxxxxxxxxx wherein xxx majority xx participants xxxxxx signs xx reluctance xx disclosing xxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx when xxxx became xxxxxxxx aware xx their xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx while xx the xxxx time xxxxxxxxxx within xxx closed xxxxxxx of xxx participants xxxxxxxxx families xxx were xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx were xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx participants xxxxxxxxx their xxxxxx identities xxxxxxxxxx discretion xxxxxxxxxxx Support xxxxxxxx several xxxxxxxxxxxx reported xx absence xx support xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx their xxxxxx identities xxxxxxx acceptance xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx of xxxxx homosexual xxxxx through xxxxxxxxxxx organizations xxx social xxxxxxxxxx and xxx research xxxxxxxx only x few xxxxxxxxxxxx sought xxxxxxxxxxxx assistance xx terms xx assessing xxx the xxxxxxxx paper xxx relatable xx class xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxx that xxxxxxx societal xxxxxxx which xxx shaped xxxxxxx stigmatization xxxx as xxxxxxxxx management xxx acceptance xx sexual xxxxxxxxxxx of xx individual xxx attraction xxx research xxxxxxxx multicultural xxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxx preference xxx attraction xxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx minorities xx a xxxxxxx that xxx underdeveloped xxxxx criminalizing xxx chosen xx a xxxxxxxx to xxx same-sex xxxx the xxxxxxxx also xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx at xxx faces xx dominant xxxxxxxxxxxx imposed xx hegemonic xxxxxxxxxxx disclosure xxx research xx unique xxx its xxxxxxxxxxxxx on x particular xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx context xxxxxx Rico xxx researchers xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx obstacles xxxx homoerotic xxxxxxxx experience xx Puerto xxxxx society xxxxxxx sexual xxxxxxx between xxxxxxx of xxx same xxx are xxxxxxxxxx criminal xxxxxxxx under xxxxxxx of xxx penal xxxx The xxxxxx emphasizes xxx rising xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx and xxx public xxxxx of xxxx people xx ethical xxxxxxxxx Owing xx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxx persecution xxx violence xx also xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx techniques xxxx by xxxxxxxxxx males xxxxx include xxxxxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxxx selective xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx From xxx standpoint xx comparative xxxxxxx that xx studied xx the xxxxxx and xxxxxxx all xxx previous xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx tends xx provide xx improved xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx recognition xxx revelation xx homoerotic xxxxxxxxxx in x multicultural xxxxxxx as xxx researcher xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx experiences xx previous xxxxxxxx on xxxxxx out xxx emphasize xxx importance xx studies xxxx include xxxxxxxx ethnically xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx different xxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxx Rico xxx study xxxxxxxx perspectives xx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxx imperial xxxxxxxx and x unique xxxxxx Rican xxxxxxxx heritage xx implies xxxx although xxxxxxx from xxxxxxxx gay xxx lesbian xxxxxxx are xxxxxxx Puerto xxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxx also xxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxx Rican xxx lesbian xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx people xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxx research xxxxx firstly xxx methodological xxxxx as xxxx in xxx research xxxxx employs x sound xxxxxxxxxxxxxx approach xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx acquired xxxxxxxxxxxxx Review xxxxx permission xxx conducted xxxxxxxxxxxx sociological xxxxxxxx protocols xx ensure xxxxxxx issues xxxx satisfied xxx also xxxx performed xxxxxxxxxxxx interviews xxxx adult xxxxx who xxxx sex xxxx men xxx with x subgroup xx ten xxxxxxxxxxx receiving xxxxxxxx interviews xxxx gives xxxxxx to xxx untampered xxxxxxxxxx primary xxxx source xxx incorporation xx qualitative xxxxxxxxxx enables x more xxxxxxxx investigation xx gender xxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx Secondly xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx of xxx research xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx among xxx in xxx Puerto xxxxx region xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx recruited xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx ages xxxxxx into xxxxxxx demographic xxxxxxx in xxx definitions xx gender xxx sexuality xxx attempting xx reach xxxxxxxxxxx from xxx socioeconomic xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx fliers xx MSM-frequented xxxxx Some xx the xxxxx strengths xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx data xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxxx demographics xxxxxxxxxx expertise xxxxxxxxxx knowledge xxx varying xxxxxxxxxxxx risk-taking xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx rejection xx characteristics xxxxxxx to xxxxxx Rican xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx about xxxx heterosexual xxx homosexual xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx study xx the xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx participants xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx there xxxx limitations xx Sampling xxxxx the xxxxx recognizes xxx difficulties xx finding xxxxxxxxxxxx from xxx MSM xxxxxxxxxx especially xxx impoverished xxx privileged xxxxxxxx However xxxxxxx the xxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx selection xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx size xx participants xxxxx not xxxxxxxxxxxx reflect xxx variety xx Puerto xxxxxx MSM xxxxxxxxx and xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx individuals xxxx underserved xxxxxxx may xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx generalizability xxxxxxxx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Perspectives xxxxx it xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx gender xx the xxxxxxxx expressly xxxx transgender xxx transsexual xxxxxx weren't xxxxxxxx in xxx population xxxxx studied xxxxx the xxxxxxx goal xx studying xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx identities xxx absence xx these xxxxxxxxxx may xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx findings' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xx order xx create x more xxxxxxxxxxxxx perspective xx gender xxx sexuality xxxxxx research xxxxxx include xxxxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxxxx voices xxxxxxx the xxxxxx reported xx the xxxxxxxx tend xx be xxxxxxxxxxxxxx participants xxx produce xxxxxx or xxxxxxxx desired xxxxxxx particularly xxxx addressing xxxxxxxxx themes xxxx sexuality xxxxx the xxxxxx does xxx go xxxx detail xx the xxxxx used xx reduce xxxx bias xxxxx may xxxx an xxxxxx on xxx findings' xxxxxxxx Conclusion xx conclusion xxx result xx the xxxxxxxx tends xx evaluate xxx information xxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxxxxx pertaining xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxx gender xxx sexual xxxxxxxx when xxxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxx from x comparative xxxxxxxxxx standpoint xx accordance xxxx my xxxxxxxxxxxxx we xxx evaluate xxx people xx other xxxx periods xx civilizations xxxxx interpret xxx respond xx the xxxxxxxxxxx considering xxxxxxx and xxxxx data's xxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxx with xxxxx masculine xxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx However xxxxx participants xxxxxxxx being xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx including xxx bisexual xxxxxxx who xxxxxx bewilderment xxx discontent xxxxx their xxxxxxxxx but xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxx that xxxxxxx illustrate xxx difficulties xxxx people xxx do xxx comply xx standard xxxxxx gender xxx sexual xxxxx confront xxx interviews xxxx provided xxxxxxx into xxx lives xx bisexual xxxxxx who xxxxxx about xxx problems xxxx had xx a xxxxxx of xxxxx perceived xx socially xxxxxxxx by xxxx homosexual xxx straight xxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx orientation xxx the xxxxxx interactions xxxx underlie xx The xxxxx on xxxxxx practices xxx fantasies xxxxxxxx the xxxxx community's xxxxxx spectrum xx experiences xxx aspirations xx terms xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx point xx view xx is xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx their xxxxxxx position xxxxx only xx the xxxxx presented xx the xxxxx hand xx offers xxx respondents' xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx without xxxxxxx prejudice xx judgment xxx inclusion xx a xxxx range xx perspectives xxx experiences xxxxxxx an xxxxxxxx to xxxx a xxxxxxxx grasp xx the xxxxxxx This xxxxx is xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx debates xx the xxxxxx States xxxx LGBTQ xxxxxx identity xxx acceptance xxxxx several xxxxxxxxxxx face xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx their xxxxxx orientations xx well xx the xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx echo xxxx modern xxxxxx of xxxxxx out xxx obtaining xxxxxxxxx from xxx societal xxxxxxxxxxxx stigmatizing xxxxxx identities xxxx respondents' xxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx humiliation xxx prejudice xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx significance xx fostering xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx homophobia xxx stigma xx conclusion xxxx data xxxxxxxx reveals xxxx people's xxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxx gender xxx sexual xxxxxxxxxx may xxxxxx and xxxx social xxxxxxxxx individual xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx backing xxxxxxxxxx all xxxx important xxxxx The xxxxx is xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx political xxx cultural xxxxxx in xxx United xxxxxx emphasizing xxx significance xx acceptance xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx rights xxx people xx all xxxxxx orientationsMore Articles From History
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
