Question.4550 - The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that "to achieve First Amendment protection, a plaintiff must show that they possessed: 1) a message to be communicated; and 2) an audience to receive that message, regardless of the medium in which the message is to be expressed."With this ruling in mind, consider the following case involving a photographer and private security guards:In 2003, Ram Z. Porat was photographing a group of New York City residential buildings known as Lincoln Towers when he was approached by a security guard who told him that management policy didn't allow nonresidents to photograph the buildings. Porat continued taking pictures and entered a public courtyard on the premises of the buildings. When the guard questioned him, Porat said that "he was taking pictures for aesthetic and recreational reasons." The guard demanded identification and also to see the pictures. Porat refused. Another guard informed Porat he was under civilian arrest and called police, who ticketed Porat for trespassing.Porat filed suit in federal district court, stating that the guards and police had violated his First Amendment rights when they ticketed him for protected conduct.What do you think? Based on the facts presented and considering the Supreme Court definition of protected behavior, did Porat prevail in his lawsuit?
Answer Below:
Hello xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx else xxxxx on xx understanding x would xxxx to xxxxx that xxx Porat's xxxx hinges xx visual xxxxxxxxxxxxx rights xxx spatial xxxxxxx in xxxxxx design xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx Court's xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx Amendment xxxxxxxxxx emphasizes xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx both xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx composition xxx storytelling xxxxx considering xxxxxxx claim xxxx entirely xxxxxx on xxxxxxx Lincoln xxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxx was x truly xxxxxx space xxxx a xxxxxxxxx perspective xxxxxxxxxxxxx spatial xxxxxxxxx where xxxxxxxxxxx areas xxx still xx regulated xx private xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx access xx a xx flaw xx Stopped xxx Photographing xx Public xxxxxxxx considering xxx stated xxxxxx aesthetic xxx recreational xxxxxxxxxxx aligns xxxx graphic xxxxxx fundamentals xxxx visual xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx wherein xxx ACLU xxxxxxxx artistic xxxxxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx photography xx a xxxx of xxxxxx expression xx Stopped xxx Photographing xx Public xx no xxxxx signage xxxxxxxxxx photography xxxxxxx case xxxxxxxxxxx wherein xxxxxxxxxxxxx graphic xxxxxxxxx ensure xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxx designations xx based xx my xxxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx that xxxxx likely xxxx due xx trespassing xx private xxxxxxxx rules xxxxxxxx design xxxxxx in xxxxx interpretation xxxxxxxxxxxx stopped xxx photographing xx public xxxxxxx ACLU xx DC xxxxx www xxxxxx org xx know-your-rights xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx text xxxxxx photographs xxx video xx things xxxx other xxxxxxxxxx officials xxxxxxxx out xxxxx duties xxxx When xx public xxxxxx where xxx are xxxxxxxxxx anything xxxx is xx plain xxxxMore Articles From Human Resource
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
