About Us Take My Online Class

Question.4032 - For this final essay, you are required to reference ten(!!!), academic, peer-reviewed sources from the LARC. To help encourage you in that process, I would like you to complete another annotated bibliography, which is a great note-taking step in the research process on your subject, which is why I like to do them before each research essay.These entries each have two parts, the bibliographic citation and the annotation. Here is a more detailed breakdown: The MLA style works cited page bibliographic citation is part one. One example is:  Estrich, Susan. "Separate is Better." Mercury Reader. Ed. Dr. Ronda L.        Dively. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2010. Print. Start by tying the source directly back to your research question (how does this source help you address one of your criteria). The actual paragraph should contain a short, objective summary about the source and author (typically 3-5 sentences) being sure to highlight the central argument of the source. These annotations must also comment on the quality, usefulness, or effectiveness of the source (typically 3-5 sentences). A quote is also expected at one point in your annotations. Here is an example of the annotation for the above: In considering whether or not to send my daughter to an all-girl's school this Fall, Susan Estrich's experience as detailed in a number of articles at a similar institution are invaluable. Estrich's article, originally published in The New York Times, addresses the status of female students in the classroom and how they are often overlooked in math and science classrooms, leading to low self-esteem and lower test scores in those areas. Estrich proposes gender-specific classrooms in order to address these issues, relying primarily upon her experience at Wellesley University to promote this solution. This article is heavily reliant upon personal experience and ambiguous studies and may also be a bit dated, yet it is valuable for its firm stance on gender bias in the classroom and the idea of separation by gender to not only support women but also other groups like African American males, “Sometimes separate isn’t equal; it’s better” (Estrich 160). Estrich's article establishes a clear answer for my question, but do gender-segregated classrooms, while somewhat effective at encouraging girls to achieve, ultimately encourage long-term gender bias in the classroom? Your annotated bibliography must include at least ten secondary sources.   A great resource for double checking your MLA style (especially if you use a web or application based citation generator) is Purdue Owl. Remember, these sources need to be high quality. That does not mean academic in nature necessarily (you can use sources from the LARC or .gov/.edu websites), but they must be from reputable sources and highly relevant to your causal argument. Make sure to defend your selection of sources in your annotation (in other words, answer the question, "why are they reputable?") All citations and essay format must follow MLA guidelines. Make sure your annotated bibliography is typed, double spaced with a proper heading. Do not use the article's abstract for your annotation- it will ping the plagiarism report While you should maintain an academic tone, using of the first person when describing why you chose the source is perfectly acceptable  Here is that same example as a full entry:Estrich, Susan. "Separate is Better." Mercury Reader. Ed. Dr. Ronda L.       Dively. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2010. Print.In considering whether or not to send my daughter to an all-girl's school this Fall, Susan Estrich's experience as detailed in a number of articles at a similar institution are invaluable. Estrich's article, originally published in The New York Times, addresses the status of female students in the classroom and how they are often overlooked in math and science classrooms, leading to low self-esteem and lower test scores in those areas. Estrich proposes gender-specific classrooms in order to address these issues, relying primarily upon her experience at Wellesley University to promote this solution. This article is heavily reliant upon personal experience and ambiguous studies and may also be a bit dated, yet it is valuable for its firm stance on gender bias in the classroom and the idea of separation by gender to not only support women but also other groups like African American males, “Sometimes separate isn’t equal; it’s better” (Estrich 160). Estrich's article establishes a clear answer for my question, but do gender-segregated classrooms, while somewhat effective at encouraging girls to achieve, ultimately encourage long-term gender bias in the classroom?

Answer Below:

Chordiya xxxxxx and xxxxx Hubbell xxxxx Fostering xxxxxxxx Pay xxxxxx Through xxxxxx Neutral xxx Evaluations x Case xxxxx of xxx Federal xxx Evaluation xxxxxx rdquo xxxxxx Personnel xxxxxxxxxx vol xx Mar xx ndash xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxx This xxxxxxx investigates xxx function xx gender-neutral xxx evaluation xx advancing xxx equity xxxxx the xxxxxxx Job xxxxxxxxxx System xx a xxxx study xxx authors xxxxxxx that xxxxxxx of xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxx criteria xxxxxxxxxxx job xxxxxxxxxxx frequently xxxxxxxxxx occupations xxxx are xxxxxxxxx by xxxxx leading xx wage xxxxxxxxxxx They xxxxxx purposefully xxxxxxxxxxxxx gender-neutral xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx fair xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx offers xxxxxx strategies xxx promoting xxxxxxxx pay xxxxxxxx and xx extremely xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx problems xxxxxx the xxxxxx pay xxx It xx a xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx resource xxx suggesting xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx gender xxxx in xxxxxxxxxx compensation xxxxxxx of xxx sound xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx case xxxxx The xxxxxxx stress xxxx the xxx to xxxxxxxxx fairness xx proactively xxxxxxxxx evaluations xxxx value xxx job xxxxxxx equally xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx nbsp xxxx Harvey xxxx Marie xxxxx Gender xxx Gap xxxxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxx Dream xx a xxxxxxxxxxx Reality xxxxx Labor xxx Journal xxx no xxxxxx pp xxxxx EBSCOhost xxxxxx ebscohost xxx login xxxx direct xxxx amp xxxxxxxx ip xxx amp xx buh xxx AN xxx site xxxxxxxx With xxxxxxx median xxxxxxxx in xxxxx trailing xxxxx by xxxx article xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx gender xxx gap xx the xxxxxx States xxxxxx looks xx the xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx elements xxxx lead xx this xxxxxxxxxxx such xx gendered xxxxxx pathways xxx conventional xxxxx about xxxx breadwinners xx addition xx highlighting xxx unforeseen xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx imbalances xxx paper xxxxxxxxxx evaluates xxxxxxxxx opposing xxx fairness xxxx as xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxx disruptions xxx paper xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx policy xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx changes xxxxx providing x thorough xxxxxxxx of xxxxxx legislative xxxxxxxxxxx Harvey's xxxxxxxx research xxx inclusion xx conflicting xxxxxxxxxx make xxxx piece x vital xxx well-rounded xxxxxxxx She xxxxxx out xxxx addressing xxxxxx pay xxxxxxxxxxx is x societal xxxxx that xxxxxxxx systemic xxxxxx not xxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx one xxxxxx nbsp xxxx Ashley xx al xxxxx The xxxxxxxxx Gender xxx Gap xx Maryland xxxxxxx State xxx Future xxxxxxxxxx rdquo xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx vol xx Dec xx ndash xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxx The xxxxxx wage xxxxxxxxx among xxxxxxxx physicians xxxx to xx examined xx this xxxxx The xxxxxxxx shows xxxx despite xxxxxxx knowledge xxxxx is xxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx income xxx with xxxxx making xxxx in xxxx males xxxxxxxx prejudices xxxxxx school xxxx loads xxx women xxx unfair xxxxxxxxxxxx practices xxx the xxxxxxx given xx the xxxxxxx for xxxx disparity xxx study's xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxxx by xxx application xx both xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx analysis xxxx article xxxxxx data-supported xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx and xx an xxxxxxxxx resource xxx comprehending xxx the xxxxxx wage xxx continues xx exist xxxx in xxxxxx regulated xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx draw xxx conclusion xxxx structural xxxxxxxx contributing xx the xxxxxxxx must xx addressed xx efforts xx reduce xxx gender xxx gap xxxx et xx nbsp xxxxxxxxxx Madinah x et xx ldquo xxxxxxxx rsquo xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx the xxxxxx Pay xxx An xxxxxxxxxxxx Study xxxxx Public xxxxxxxxxx Review xxx no xxxx pp xxxxx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx nbsp xxxx article xxxx an xxxxxxxxxxxx poll xx investigate xxx the xxxxxxx public xxxxx gender xxx equity xxxxxxxxx to xxx report xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx differences xx worker xxxxxxxxxxx most xxxxxx are xx favor xx initiatives xx reduce xxx gender xxxx gap xxx results xxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx public xxxxxxx is xxx legislative xxxxxxxx meant xx advance xxxxxx This xx a xxxxxx tool xxx comprehending xxxxxx support xxx pay xxxxxx measures xxxxx the xxxxxxx use x novel xxxxxxxxx approach xx investigate xxxxxx attitudes xxxxxxxxx to xxx study xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx changes xxxxxx gender xxxxxx can xx driven xx public xxxxxxx Hamidullah xx al xxxx Leslie xxxx M xx al xxxxx Why xxx When xxxx the xxxxxx Gap xxxxxxx Diversity xxxxx and xxx Pay xxxxxxx for xxxx Potential xxxxx rdquo xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Journal xxx no xxx pp xxxxx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx amj xxxx This xxxxx looks xx situations xxxxx high-potential xxxxx benefit xxxx a xxxxxx wage xxx that xxxxxxxx especially xx companies xxxx aggressive xxxxxxxxx initiatives xxxxxx and xxx co-authors xxxxxxx that xx some xxxxxxxxxx there xx a xxxxxx premium xxxxx these xxxxx are xxxx as xxxxxxxxx resources xxx accomplishing xxxxx objectives xxxxx field xxxxxxxx and xxxxx the xxxxx explains xxxx phenomenon xx referencing xxxxxxxx of xxxxx resource xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxxx offers xxxxxxxxxxxxx insights xxxx diversity-driven xxxxxxxxxxxx strategies xxx questions xxxxxxxxxxxx wisdom xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx pay xxx The xxxxxxx observe xxxx a xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxx values xx reflected xx the xxxxxx pay xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxxxx women xx organizations xxxx prioritize xxxxxxxxx Leslie xx al xxxx Krieger xxxxxxxxx et xx ldquo xxxxxxx the xxxxxx Gap xx Entrepreneurship xxx Importance xx Skill xxxxxxx rdquo xxxx ONE xxx no xxxx pp xxxxx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx journal xxxx This xxxxx looks xxxx how xxx gender xxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx persists xxx how xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx diversity xxxxxxxxxx to xx Despite xxxxxxxxx males xx early xxxxx diversity xxxxxx youth xxx authors xxxxxxxx critical xxxxx where xxxxx fall xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx human xxxxxxx based xx their xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx data xxxx Finnish xxxxxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxxx They xxxxxxx that xxxxxxx aspirations xx start xxxxx own xxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxx by xxx absence xx skill xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx adulthood's xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx settings xxx paper xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx interventions xx assist xxxxxx entrepreneurs xx pointing xxx systemic xxxxxxxxx in xxx development xx human xxxxxxx Early xxxxxxxxx is x crucial xxxxxxx point xxxxx educational xxx vocational xxxxxxx fail xx foster xxxxxxx entrepreneurial xxxxxxxxx according xx the xxxxxxxx Krieger xx al xxxx Ugarte xxxxxxxxx M xxx Jill xxxxxx ldquo xxxxxx Pay xxxxxx Exploring xxx Impact xx Formal xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Human xxxxxxxx Management xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx rdquo xxxxx Resource xxxxxxxxxx Journal xxx no xxx pp xxxxx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx - xxx effect xx established xx procedures xx lessening xxxxxx bias xx compensation xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx in xxxx research xxx authors xxxx that xxxxx aren't xxxx differences xx starting xxxxxx and xxxxx pay xxxxxxx men xxx women xxxxx a xxxx study xx a xxxxxxx banking xxxxxxx with xxxx HR xxxxxxxxx They xx however xxxxxx systematic xxxxxx in xxxxxx role xxxxxxxxxx where xxxxx performed xxxxxx on xxxxxx potential xxxxx According xx the xxxxxxxx deeply xxxxxx biases xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx gender xxxxxx at xxxxxx levels xxxx while xxxxxx HR xxxxxxxx help xx lessen xxxx injustices xxxxxxxxx insights xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx equitable xxxxxxx are xxxxxxx by xxxx sophisticated xxxxxxxxxxx Transparent xx systems xxxxxxxx but xx not xxxxxxxxx structural xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx pay xxxxxx the xxxxxxx came xx the xxxxxxxxxx Ugarte xxx Rubery xxxx Elia xxxx et xx ldquo xxxxxxx the xxxxxx Pay xxx in xxxxxxxxx Medicine xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx Faculty xxx Trainees xxxxx AEM xxxxxxxxx amp xxxxxxxx vol xxxx pp x ndash xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxx nbsp xxx gender xxxx gap xxxx still xxxxxx among xxxxxxxxx medicine xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx in xxxx article xxxxx with xxx long-term xxxxxxx on xxxxxx earnings xx examines xxxxxxxxxxxxx efforts xx address xxx disparities xxxx as xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx pinpoints xxxxxxxxxx causes xx pay xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx ranks xxx leadership xxxxxxxxx It xxxx offers xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx practical xxxx to xxxxxxx fair xxx open xxxxxxxxxxxx policies xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx that xxxxxx pay xxx empower xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx enabling xxxx to xxxxxxxx structural xxxxxxxx to xxx equity xxx article xxxxxxxxxx Elia xx al x nbsp xxxx Magda xxx and xxx Cukrowska-Torzewska xxxxx Do xxxxx Managers xxxxx Gender xxx Gaps xxxxxxxx from xxxxxx and xxxxxxx Firms xxxxx Feminist xxxxxxxxx vol xx Oct xx ndash xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxx Using xxxx from xxxxxx public xxx private xxxxxxxxx this xxxxx examines xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx percentage xx female xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx gender xxxx inequalities xxxxxxxxx to xxx data xxxxx managers xx the xxxxxx sector xxxxxxxxxx increase xxx equity xx organizations xxxx highly xxxxxxxx staff xxx incomes xxxx are xxxxxxx roughly xxxxx The xxxxxx is xxxx pronounced xx private xxxxxxxxx where x greater xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx employees xxxxx rather xxxx female xxxxxxxx mdash xx linked xx smaller xxx disparities xxx authors xxxxx out xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx leadership xx lowering xxxxxx discrepancies xx greatly xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx factors xxxxxxx to xxxxxx gender xxx gaps xxxx focus xx systemic xxxxxx and xx beyond xxxxxxxxxxxxxx they xxxxxxxx Magda xxx Cukrowska-Torzewska xxxx Yin xx Hui xx al xxxxx Toward xxxxxxxxxxx Development xxxx Digitalization xxxxxx the xxxxxx Gap xx the xxxxx Market xxxxx Sustainable xxxxxxxxxxx vol xx Oct xx ndash xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xx This xxxxxxx examines xxx between xxx digitization xxxxxx close xxx gender xxx in xxxxx market xxxxxxxxxxxxx among x countries xxx results xxxxx that xx raising xxxxxx employment xxxxx and xxxxxxxx female xxxxxxxxxxxx digitalization xxxxxxx gender xxxx especially xx high-income xxxxxxx However xxx interplay xxxxxxx globalization xxx digitization xxxxx occasionally xxxx gender xxxxxxxxxxx worse xx upper- xxx lower-middle-income xxxxxxxxx The xxxxx emphasizes xxx digital xxxxxxxxxxxx might xxxxxxxxx women xx enter xxx workforce xxxxxxxxxx in xxx service xxxxxxxx but xx also xxxxx how xxxxxxxxxxx social xxx economic xxxxxx interact xx influence xxxxxxx According xx the xxxxxxx Equitable xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx can xxxx be xxxxxxx through xxxxxxxx digital xxxxxxxxx policies xxx et xx nbsp xxxx nbsp xxxx nbsp xxxx

More Articles From Education_Teaching

TAGLINE HEADING

More Subjects Homework Help