Question.4032 - For this final essay, you are required to reference ten(!!!), academic, peer-reviewed sources from the LARC. To help encourage you in that process, I would like you to complete another annotated bibliography, which is a great note-taking step in the research process on your subject, which is why I like to do them before each research essay.These entries each have two parts, the bibliographic citation and the annotation. Here is a more detailed breakdown: The MLA style works cited page bibliographic citation is part one. One example is: Estrich, Susan. "Separate is Better." Mercury Reader. Ed. Dr. Ronda L. Dively. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2010. Print. Start by tying the source directly back to your research question (how does this source help you address one of your criteria). The actual paragraph should contain a short, objective summary about the source and author (typically 3-5 sentences) being sure to highlight the central argument of the source. These annotations must also comment on the quality, usefulness, or effectiveness of the source (typically 3-5 sentences). A quote is also expected at one point in your annotations. Here is an example of the annotation for the above: In considering whether or not to send my daughter to an all-girl's school this Fall, Susan Estrich's experience as detailed in a number of articles at a similar institution are invaluable. Estrich's article, originally published in The New York Times, addresses the status of female students in the classroom and how they are often overlooked in math and science classrooms, leading to low self-esteem and lower test scores in those areas. Estrich proposes gender-specific classrooms in order to address these issues, relying primarily upon her experience at Wellesley University to promote this solution. This article is heavily reliant upon personal experience and ambiguous studies and may also be a bit dated, yet it is valuable for its firm stance on gender bias in the classroom and the idea of separation by gender to not only support women but also other groups like African American males, “Sometimes separate isn’t equal; it’s better” (Estrich 160). Estrich's article establishes a clear answer for my question, but do gender-segregated classrooms, while somewhat effective at encouraging girls to achieve, ultimately encourage long-term gender bias in the classroom? Your annotated bibliography must include at least ten secondary sources. A great resource for double checking your MLA style (especially if you use a web or application based citation generator) is Purdue Owl. Remember, these sources need to be high quality. That does not mean academic in nature necessarily (you can use sources from the LARC or .gov/.edu websites), but they must be from reputable sources and highly relevant to your causal argument. Make sure to defend your selection of sources in your annotation (in other words, answer the question, "why are they reputable?") All citations and essay format must follow MLA guidelines. Make sure your annotated bibliography is typed, double spaced with a proper heading. Do not use the article's abstract for your annotation- it will ping the plagiarism report While you should maintain an academic tone, using of the first person when describing why you chose the source is perfectly acceptable Here is that same example as a full entry:Estrich, Susan. "Separate is Better." Mercury Reader. Ed. Dr. Ronda L. Dively. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing, 2010. Print.In considering whether or not to send my daughter to an all-girl's school this Fall, Susan Estrich's experience as detailed in a number of articles at a similar institution are invaluable. Estrich's article, originally published in The New York Times, addresses the status of female students in the classroom and how they are often overlooked in math and science classrooms, leading to low self-esteem and lower test scores in those areas. Estrich proposes gender-specific classrooms in order to address these issues, relying primarily upon her experience at Wellesley University to promote this solution. This article is heavily reliant upon personal experience and ambiguous studies and may also be a bit dated, yet it is valuable for its firm stance on gender bias in the classroom and the idea of separation by gender to not only support women but also other groups like African American males, “Sometimes separate isn’t equal; it’s better” (Estrich 160). Estrich's article establishes a clear answer for my question, but do gender-segregated classrooms, while somewhat effective at encouraging girls to achieve, ultimately encourage long-term gender bias in the classroom?
Answer Below:
Chordiya xxxxxx and xxxxx Hubbell xxxxxxxxx Internal xxx Equity xxxxxxx Gender xxxxxxx Job xxxxxxxxxxx A xxxx Study xx the xxxxxxx Job xxxxxxxxxx System xxxxxx Personnel xxxxxxxxxx vol xx Mar xx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx This xxxxxxx investigates xxx function xx gender-neutral xxx evaluation xx advancing xxx equity xxxxx the xxxxxxx Job xxxxxxxxxx System xx a xxxx study xxx authors xxxxxxx that xxxxxxx of xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxx criteria xxxxxxxxxxx job xxxxxxxxxxx frequently xxxxxxxxxx occupations xxxx are xxxxxxxxx by xxxxx leading xx wage xxxxxxxxxxx They xxxxxx purposefully xxxxxxxxxxxxx gender-neutral xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx fair xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx offers xxxxxx strategies xxx promoting xxxxxxxx pay xxxxxxxx and xx extremely xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx problems xxxxxx the xxxxxx pay xxx It xx a xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx resource xxx suggesting xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx gender xxxx in xxxxxxxxxx compensation xxxxxxx of xxx sound xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx case xxxxx The xxxxxxx stress xxxx the xxx to xxxxxxxxx fairness xx proactively xxxxxxxxx evaluations xxxx value xxx job xxxxxxx equally xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx Harvey xxxx Marie xxxxxx Pay xxx Elimination x Hopeless xxxxx or x Conceivable xxxxxxx Labor xxx Journal xxx no xxxxxx pp xxxxxxxxx search xxxxxxxxx com xxxxx aspx xxxxxx true xxxxxxxx ip xxx db xxx AN xxxx eds-live xxxx women's xxxxxx earnings xx still xxxxxxxx men's xx this xxxxxxx examines xxx ongoing xxxxxx pay xxx in xxx United xxxxxx Harvey xxxxx at xxx social xxx economic xxxxxxxx that xxxx to xxxx discrepancy xxxx as xxxxxxxx career xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx ideas xxxxx male xxxxxxxxxxxx In xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx implications xx continuing xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx critically xxxxxxxxx arguments xxxxxxxx pay xxxxxxxx such xx concerns xxxxx economic xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx highlights xxx necessity xx proactive xxxxxx measures xxx cultural xxxxxxx while xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx analysis xx recent xxxxxxxxxxx initiatives xxxxxxxx in-depth xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx viewpoints xxxx this xxxxx a xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx resource xxx points xxx that xxxxxxxxxx gender xxx disparities xx a xxxxxxxx issue xxxx requires xxxxxxxx change xxx just x legislative xxx Harvey xxxx Ashley xx al xxx Physician xxxxxx Pay xxx in xxxxxxxx Current xxxxx and xxxxxx Directions xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx vol xx Dec xx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx The xxxxxx wage xxxxxxxxx among xxxxxxxx physicians xxxx to xx examined xx this xxxxx The xxxxxxxx shows xxxx despite xxxxxxx knowledge xxxxx is xxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx income xxx with xxxxx making xxxx in xxxx males xxxxxxxx prejudices xxxxxx school xxxx loads xxx women xxx unfair xxxxxxxxxxxx practices xxx the xxxxxxx given xx the xxxxxxx for xxxx disparity xxx study's xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxxx by xxx application xx both xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx analysis xxxx article xxxxxx data-supported xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx and xx an xxxxxxxxx resource xxx comprehending xxx the xxxxxx wage xxx continues xx exist xxxx in xxxxxx regulated xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx draw xxx conclusion xxxx structural xxxxxxxx contributing xx the xxxxxxxx must xx addressed xx efforts xx reduce xxx gender xxx gap xxxx et xx Hamidullah xxxxxxx F xx al xxxxxxxx Perceptions xx Closing xxx Gender xxx Gap xx Experimental xxxxx Public xxxxxxxxxx Review xxx no xxxx pp xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxx article xxxx an xxxxxxxxxxxx poll xx investigate xxx the xxxxxxx public xxxxx gender xxx equity xxxxxxxxx to xxx report xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx differences xx worker xxxxxxxxxxx most xxxxxx are xx favor xx initiatives xx reduce xxx gender xxxx gap xxx results xxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx public xxxxxxx is xxx legislative xxxxxxxx meant xx advance xxxxxx This xx a xxxxxx tool xxx comprehending xxxxxx support xxx pay xxxxxx measures xxxxx the xxxxxxx use x novel xxxxxxxxx approach xx investigate xxxxxx attitudes xxxxxxxxx to xxx study xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx changes xxxxxx gender xxxxxx can xx driven xx public xxxxxxx Hamidullah xx al xxxxxx Lisa x et xx Why xxx When xxxx the xxxxxx Gap xxxxxxx Diversity xxxxx and xxx Pay xxxxxxx for xxxx Potential xxxxx Academy xx Management xxxxxxx vol xx Apr xx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx amj xxxx essay xxxxx at xxxxxxxxxx where xxxxxxxxxxxxxx women xxxxxxx from x gender xxxx gap xxxx reverses xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxx diversity xxxxxxxxxxx Leslie xxx her xxxxxxxxxx contend xxxx in xxxx situations xxxxx is x female xxxxxxx since xxxxx women xxx seen xx important xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxx Using xxxxx research xxx tests xxx study xxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx theories xx human xxxxxxxx management xxx economics xxxx resource xxxxxx sophisticated xxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx compensation xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx conventional xxxxxx regarding xxx gender xxx gap xxx authors xxxxxxx that x shift xx organizational xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx in xxx higher xxx received xx high-potential xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx diversity xxxxxx et xx Krieger xxxxxxxxx et xx Closing xxx Gender xxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx Variety xxxx ONE xxx no xxxx pp xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxxxxx pone xxxx study xxxxx into xxx the xxxxxx gap xx entrepreneurship xxxxxxxx and xxx variations xx skill xxxxxxxxx contribute xx it xxxxxxx exceeding xxxxx in xxxxx skill xxxxxxxxx during xxxxx the xxxxxxx identify xxxxxxxx times xxxxx women xxxx behind xx entrepreneurial xxxxx capital xxxxx on xxxxx analysis xx longitudinal xxxx from xxxxxxx adolescents xxxx adulthood xxxx contend xxxx women's xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx their xxx businesses xxx hampered xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxx development xx early xxxxxxxxxxx educational xxx occupational xxxxxxxx The xxxxx emphasizes xxx necessity xx focused xxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx female xxxxxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxx out xxxxxxxx obstacles xx the xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx capital xxxxx adulthood xx a xxxxxxx turning xxxxx where xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx systems xxxx to xxxxxx women's xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx potential xxxxxxxxx to xxx findings xxxxxxx et xx Ugarte xxxxxxxxx M xxx Jill xxxxxx Gender xxx Equity xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxxx Consistent xxx Transparent xxxxx Resource xxxxxxxxxx Practices xxx Information xxxxx Resource xxxxxxxxxx Journal xxx no xxx pp xxxxxxxxx https xxx org x The xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx HR xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx gender xxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx settings xx examined xx this xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx find xxxx there xxxxxx many xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx salary xxx merit xxx between xxx and xxxxx using x case xxxxx of x Chilean xxxxxxx company xxxx open xx practices xxxx do xxxxxxx reveal xxxxxxxxxx biases xx senior xxxx promotions xxxxx males xxxxxxxxx better xx future xxxxxxxxx tests xxxxxxxxx to xxx findings xxxxxx rooted xxxxxx continue xx impede xxxxxx equity xx higher xxxxxx even xxxxx formal xx policies xxxx to xxxxxx some xxxxxxxxxx Important xxxxxxxx into xxx shortcomings xx policy-driven xxxxxxxxx metrics xxx offered xx this xxxxxxxxxxxxx examination xxxxxxxxxxx HR xxxxxxx mitigate xxx do xxx eliminate xxxxxxxxxx barriers xx gender xxx equity xxx authors xxxx to xxx conclusion xxxxxx and xxxxxx Elia xxxx et xx Closing xxx Gender xxx Gap xx Emergency xxxxxxxx Paradigms xx Consider xxx Leaders xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx AEM xxxxxxxxx Training xxx June xx S xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxx The xxxxxx wage xxx that xxxxx exists xxxxx emergency xxxxxxxx doctors xx examined xx this xxxxxxx along xxxx its xxxxxxxxx effects xx career xxxxxxxx It xxxxxxxx institutional xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx pay xxxxxxxxxxx such xx audits xx salaries xxx changes xx remuneration xxx study xxxxxxxxx structural xxxxxx of xxx inequities xx concentrating xx differences xx senior xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx positions xx also xxxxxx academics xxx trainees xxxxxxxxx ways xx promote xxxx and xxxx remuneration xxxxxxxx Knowing xxx factors xxxx affect xxx can xxxxxxx women xx negotiations xxxxxxxx them xx navigate xxxxxxxxxx barriers xx pay xxxxxx the xxxxxxx highlights xxxx et xx S xxxxx Iga xxx Ewa xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do xxxxx Managers xxxxx Gender xxx Gaps xxxxxxxx from xxxxxx and xxxxxxx Firms xxxxxxxx Economics xxx no xxx pp xxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxxx data xxxx Polish xxxxxx and xxxxxxx companies xxxx study xxxxxxxx whether x greater xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx managers xx associated xxxx smaller xxxxxx wage xxxxxxxxxxxx According xx the xxxx women xxxxxxxx in xxx public xxxxxx marginally xxxxxxxx pay xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxx educated xxxxx and xxxxxxx that xxx already xxxxxxx equal xxx effect xx less xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx companies xxxxx a xxxxxxx proportion xx female xxxxxxxxx rather xxxx female xxxxxxxx is xxxxxx to xxxxxxx pay xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx point xxx that xxx effectiveness xx female xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx salary xxxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxx influenced xx structural xxx institutional xxxxxxx Efforts xx reduce xxxxxx pay xxxx must xxxxx on xxxxxxxx change xxx go xxxxxx representation xxxx conclude xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yin xx Hui xx al xxxxxx Sustainable xxxxxxxxxxx Does xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Narrow xxx Gender xxx in xxx Labor xxxxxx Sustainable xxxxxxxxxxx vol xx Oct xx EBSCOhost xxxxx doi xxx sd xxxx article xxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx helped xxxxx the xxxxxx gap xx labor xxxxxx participation xxxxx G xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx imply xxxx by xxxxxxx female xxxxxxxxxx rates xxx lowering xxxxxx unemployment xxxxxxxxxxxxxx lessens xxxxxx gaps xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxx nations xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx might xxxxxxxxxxxx make xxxxxx disparities xxxxx in xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx countries xxx study xxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx technologies xxxxx encourage xxxxx to xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx especially xx the xxxxxxx industry xxx it xxxx shows xxx intricately xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx results xxxxxxxxx to xxx authors xxxxxxxxx benefits xx digitalization xxx only xx ensured xxxxxxx targeted xxxxxxx inclusion xxxxxxxx Yin xx alMore Articles From Education_Teaching