Question.1091 - Write a 3- to 5-paragraphs critique of the article. In your critique, include responses to the following: Which is the research design used by the authors? Why did the authors use ANOVA test? Do you think it’s the most appropriate choice? Why or why not? Did the authors display the data? Do the results stand alone? Why or why not? Did the authors report effect size? If yes, is this meaningful?
Answer Below:
The xxxxxxxx article xxxx I xxxx used xx Acceptability xx Cognitive xxxxxxxxxxx Therapy xxx Tinnitus x Study xxxx Veterans xxx Nonveterans xxxxxxxxx et xx The xxxxxxxx design xxxx by xxx authors xx this xxxxx is x cross-sectional xxxxxx with x mixed-model xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx ANOVA xxxx design xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxx expectancy xxx acceptability xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx tinnitus xxxxxxxxx methods xxxxx two xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx methods xxx CBT xxxx and xxx and xxx participants xxxxxx are xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Rodriguez xx al xxxx analysing xxx data xxx authors xxxxxxxx ANOVA xxxxx because xxxxx were xxxxxxx independent xxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxx status xxx treatment xxxx as xxxx as xxxxxxx dependent xxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxxxxxx expectation xxx acceptance xxxxxxx ANOVA xxx an xxxxxxxxxxx choice xxx this xxxxxxx analysis xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx compared xxx means xx various xxxxxx veterans xx nonveterans xxx three xxxxxxxx treatment xxxxxxx for xxxx outcome xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx ANOVA xxx utilized xx this xxxxxxxx to xxxx into xxxxxxxxxxxxx both xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx variability xxx the xxxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx data xxxxxxxxx et xx The xxxxxxx presented xx the xxxxxxx indicate xxxx there xxxx significant xxxx effects xx veteran xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxx expectancy xxx acceptability xxxxxxx To xxxxx evaluate xxx significance xxx practical xxxxxxxxxx of xxx findings xxx would xxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx study xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx ANOVA xxxxxxx and xxxxxx sizes xx reported xxxx information xxxxx effect xxxxx it xx easier xx determine xxx practical xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx differences xxxxxxxx in xxx study xx would xx meaningful xx report xxxxxx sizes xx provide x better xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx clinical xx practical xxxxxxxxx of xxx observed xxxxxxxxxxx References xxxxxxxxx C x Piccirillo x F xxxxxxxxx T x Acceptability xx Cognitive xxxxxxxxxx Therapy xxx Tinnitus x Study xxxx Veterans xxx Nonveterans xxxxxxxx Journal xx Audiology xMore Articles From Statistics
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
