Question.1091 - Write a 3- to 5-paragraphs critique of the article. In your critique, include responses to the following: Which is the research design used by the authors? Why did the authors use ANOVA test? Do you think it’s the most appropriate choice? Why or why not? Did the authors display the data? Do the results stand alone? Why or why not? Did the authors report effect size? If yes, is this meaningful?
Answer Below:
The xxxxxxxx article xxxx I xxxx used xx Acceptability xx Cognitive xxxxxxxxxxx Therapy xxx Tinnitus x Study xxxx Veterans xxx Nonveterans xxxxxxxxx et xx The xxxxxxxx design xxxx by xxx authors xx this xxxxx is x cross-sectional xxxxxx with x mixed-model xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx ANOVA xxxx design xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxx expectancy xxx acceptability xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx tinnitus xxxxxxxxx methods xxxxx two xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx methods xxx CBT xxxx and xxx and xxx participants xxxxxx are xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Rodriguez xx al xxxx analysing xxx data xxx authors xxxxxxxx ANOVA xxxxx because xxxxx were xxxxxxx independent xxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxx status xxx treatment xxxx as xxxx as xxxxxxx dependent xxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxxxxxx expectation xxx acceptance xxxxxxx nbsp xxxxx was xx appropriate xxxxxx for xxxx study's xxxxxxxx because xxx authors xxxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxx groups xxxxxxxx vs xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx distinct xxxxxxxxx methods xxx each xxxxxxx variable xxx mixed-model xxxxx was xxxxxxxx in xxxx instance xx take xxxx consideration xxxx within-group xxx between-group xxxxxxxxxxx Yes xxx authors xxxx displayed xxxx Rodriguez xx al xxx results xxxxxxxxx in xxx article xxxxxxxx that xxxxx were xxxxxxxxxxx main xxxxxxx of xxxxxxx status xxx treatment xx credibility xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx ratings xx fully xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx importance xx the xxxxxxxx one xxxxx need xx review xxx complete xxxxx including xxx actual xxxxx results xxx effect xxxxx if xxxxxxxx With xxxxxxxxxxx about xxxxxx sizes xx is xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx significance xx the xxxxxxxxxxx reported xx the xxxxx It xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx effect xxxxx to xxxxxxx a xxxxxx understanding xx the xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx relevance xx the xxxxxxxx differences xxxxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxx C x Piccirillo x F xxx Rodebaugh x L xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Behavioral xxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx A xxxxx with xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxxxxx Journal xx Audiology xxxx -More Articles From Statistics
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
