Question.4493 - Team Assignment: Lost At Sea New AttemptDue Jun 6 by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a file uploadAssignment AI Policy Select for Details ▼OverviewEach team should create a document in which they:Report the 3 scores discussed on the lesson page:group accuracy,average individual accuracy, andbest individual accuracy.(Your entire spreadsheet is unnecessary. Simply the three numbers, labelled of course.)Also (as a team), briefly write about:If your team were faced with a somewhat parallel type of decision scenario in the future, is there anything relative to your group decision process or consensus building process that you would change or modify the next time around?How might all of this relate to the assigned article (Kahneman, Lovallo, and Sibony, “Before You Make That Big Decision”)?(About 300 words total for parts a and b combined. put total #words at end)Team discussions are not monitored by Instructor. Teams may communicate through any medium they choose. For Virtual Team-building, Lost at Sea, and Carter Racing your team must have synchronous meetings.& For Team Decisions and Fights such a meeting might help but is not necessary.SubmissionUpload this document here so that it can be graded. Also, post this in the Lesson 3 Discussion: Lost at Sea. (and when you post it please remember to indicate what team number the post represents)PreviousNext
Answer Below:
MBADM xxxxxxxx Leading xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Assignment xxxx at xxxxxx Pennsylvania xxxxx UniversityJune xxxx SixIIIIIHHHHHNNNNNJJJJJJJMMMMRRRRRRRAverage xxxxxxxxxx Accuracy xxxxx Group xxxxxxxx Score xxxx Individual xxxxxxxx Score xx our xxxx were xx face x similar xxxxxxxx in xxx future xx would xxxxxx that xxx team xxxxxxx were xxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxx team xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx meeting xx met xx two xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx we xxxxx was xxxx individuals xxxx different xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Because xxxxx team xxxxxxx were xxxx to xxxxx knowledge xx logical xxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx rankings xxxxx team xxxxxxx saw xxxxx in xxx justifications xxxxxxxx resulting xx the xxxx s xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx the xxxx s xxxxxxx from xxx first xxxxxxx The xxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxx focused xxxxxxx on xxx prioritization xx water xxxx and xxxxxx aids xxxx other xxxxxxxxxxx items xxxxx deprioritized xxxx resulted xx a xxxx ranking xxxxxx to xxxx of xxx expert xxxxxxxx The xxxx s xxxxxxxx to xxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx question xxxx member x point xx view xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxxxxx even xxxxx those xxxx members xxx already xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxx Kahneman xxxxxxx and xxxxxx introduce x checklist xxxx supports xxxxxxxx quality xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx decision xxxxxx and xxxxx for xxxx The xxxxxxxxx includes xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx should xxx themselves xxx team xxxxxxx making xxx recommendations xxxxxxxx et xx Items xxxxx in xxxx checklist xxxx on xxxxxxxxxx information xxx historical xxxx which xxx team xxx not xxxx After xxxxxxx the xxxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxxxxx it xxxx sense xxx in xxx team xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx meeting xxxxx research xxx not xxxxxxx we xxxxxx heavily xx anecdotal xxxxxxxxxxx from xxxx team xxxxxx making xx challenging xx feel xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx In xxxxxxxxxx we xxx not xxxx been xxxx to xxxxx directly xxx saliency xxxx anchoring xxxx or xxx endowment xxxxxx but xx were xxxx to xxxxx facts xxxxxxxxx to xx ask xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx making xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx perceived xxxxxxxxx accuracy xxx finally xxx each xxxxxx s xxx knowledge xx support xx oppose xxxxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Kahneman xx al xxxx count xxxxxxxxxx Kahneman x Lovallo x Sibony x The xxx idea xxxxxx you xxxx that xxx decision xxxxxxx Business xxxxxx https xxx org xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMore Articles From MBADM 816 SU25, Section 001 Managing and Leading People in Organizations
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
