Question.1219 - When you are faced with a major decision (it may be helpful to think of an actual decision you've made or are faced with), do you tend to use more of a consequential form of reasoning (making the decision based on the consequences or effect of the outcome providing the most good for the most people as described in the sections on "Consequential Ethics" and "Utilitarian Ethics" on page 267 of the textbook) or a more categorical (the book calls it "Nonconsequential Ethics" on page 267 (also part of the deontological form of ethical reasoning - Immanuel Kant's idea that there is right or wrong and we should do the right thing regardless of the consequences because it is our duty to do what is "right" as described on page 268 "Deontology")?For purposes of our discussion, let's oversimplify a bit and have two forms of ethical reasoning: Consequential Ethical Reasoning which bases the correctness of a decision on the consequences that will result (the utilitarian idea of providing the most benefit for the most people), and Categorical (or deontological) Ethical Reasoning which based the correctness of the decision on the inherent "rightness" or "wrongness" of the actions being taken. Which form of reasoning do you feel is more useful in making health care decisions in general? Explain why.
Answer Below:
Firstly xxxxxxxxxxx my xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx there xxxx several xxxxxxxxx wherein x was xxxxxx towards xxxxxx major xxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxx towards x consequential xxxx of xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx but xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx perspective xxxx gives xxxxxxxx to xxx well-being xx all xxx stakeholders xxxxxxxx seems xx fit xx a xxxxxxxx when xx comes xx healthcare xxx example xx explore xxxxxxxxxxx standpoint xxxxx be xxx vaccination xxxx collided xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx rights xxxxx at xxx same xxxx it xxx good xxx everyone xxxxxx Particularly xx healthcare xxxx it xxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxx in xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx with xxx varying xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxx pragmatic xxxx allows xxx to xxxxxxxxxxx make xxxxxxx with xxxxxx potential xx success xx serve x larger xxxxx On xxx other xxxx considering xxxxxxxxxxxxx ethics xxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxx reasoning xxxxx to xxxx a xxxxxxx appeal xx its xxxxxxxxxx to xxxx principles xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx of x healthcare xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx varying xxxxxxxxxxxxx Utilizing x consequential xxxxxxxx allows xxx adaptability xx the xxxxxx circumstances xx healthcare xxxxxxxxx where xxxxxxxx may xxxx and xxxxx duties xxx conflict xxxxx with xxxx understanding xxxxxxxxx autonomy xx given xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx professional xxxxxxxxxx at xxx same xxxx adhering xx ethics x believe xx a xxxxxxx work xxxxxxxxxxx like xxxxxxxxxx it xx difficult xx abide xx one xxxxxx a xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx to xx sustained xxxxxxx ethical xxxxxxxxxx only xxxx can xxxxxxxxxxxxxx be xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx the xxxx One xxxxxxxx example xxxx my xxxxxxxxxx could xx when x worked xxx a xxxxxxxxxx center xxx doctor xxx several xxxxxxxx related xx resource xxxxxxxxxx when xxxxxx hit xx this xxxxxxxxx applying xxxxxxxxxxxxx reasoning xxxx giving xxx to xxxxxxxx with xxxx survival xxxxxx while xxxxxxxxxxx reasoning xxxxxxx the xxxxxx to xxxxxxxx medicare xx all xxx stakeholders xxxxxxx based xx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx autonomy xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx might xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx combination xx both xxxxxxxxxxMore Articles From Medicine
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
