Question.739 - Unit 7 - Assignment Integrate an Ethical Theory into a Business SituationIn prior units we have addressed ethical theories and legal concepts in business situations. The focus of this written assignment is to specifically apply an ethical theory to the factual scenario provided.Read the factual scenario as to the “DecorMyEyes” situation, Course Documents.Prepare a three-page analysis in which you identify, define, and apply two ethical theories as to the actions of the company in this factual scenario. One Explain ethical theory should support the actions of the company and the other ethical theory should be applied to advocate for changes in the company’s practices.Use and cite at least three additional authoritative sources as you apply these ethical theories in this factual scenario other than the text materials.
Answer Below:
Unit x Assignment xxxx FugettPurdue xxxxxxxxxx LS xxxxxx and xxx Legal xxxxxxxxxxx Prof xxxxxxxx December xx The xxxxxxxxxx Ms xxxxxxxxx encountered xxxx DecorMyEyes xxx is xxxxxxxxxx with xxx harassment xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx online xx is xxxx a xxxxxx on xxx even xxxxxxxx marketing xxx be xxxx to xxxx traction xx the xxxxxxxx With xxx vast xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxx up xxxx a xxxxx click xx the xxxxxxxx it xx a xxxxxxxxx for xxx user xx determine xx they xxx being xxxxx to xxxxxxxx sites xxx to xxxxxxx if xxxx are xxxxxxxxxx original xxxxxxxx In xxx case xx Ms xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx unravels xxxx a xxxxxx of xxxxxx emails xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxx threats xx her xxxxxxxx Apart xxxx this xxx encountered x series xx unpleasant xxxxxx with xxx bank xxxx processed xxx payment xxxxxxxx In xxxx case xxx stakeholders xxx Ms xxxxxxxxx Vitaly xxxxxx Citibank xx the xxxxxxx service xxxxxxxx Google xxx the xxxxx customers xx DecorMyEyes xx Rodriguez xxx primary xxxxxx of xxxx situation xx an xxxxxxxxx stakeholder xxxxxx Borker xxx goes xx several xxxxx in xxx business xxx is xxx founder xx DecorMyEyes xx responsible xxx the xxx experiences xxxx Ms xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx other xxxxxxxxx had xxxxxxx Citibank xxxxx a xxxxx role xx their xxxxxxxx were xxxx by xx Rodriguez xxx later xxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxx revenge xx her xxxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxxxxxx gained xxxxxxx from xxx transactions xxxx and xx the xxxxxxxxxx cancellation xx refunds xxxxxx plays x vital xxxx in xxxx scenario xxxxxxx their xxxxxx engine xxxxxxxxxxx place xxxxx websites xxxx DecorMyEyes xx the xxxxxxx positions xxxx consumers xxxxxx for xxxxxx This xx key xx the xxxxxxxx as xxxxx algorithm xxx methods xxxx questioned xxxxx several xxxxxxxxx underwent xxxxxxx ordeals xxxx DecorMyEyes xxx similar xxxxxxxx Finally xxx older xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx who xxxx scammed xxx later xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxx Borker xxx essential xx this xxxxxxxx as xxxxx testimonials xxxx brought xx light xx the xxxxxxxxx Ironically xxxxx online xxxxxxxxxxxx also xxxxxxx Vitaly xxxxxx more xxxxxxxx and xxxx Vitaly xxxxxxxx interview xxxxxxxx indicate xxxx he xxx not xxxxx by xxx adverse xxxxxxxxx he xxx his xxxxxxx received xx selling xxxx products xxx his xxxxxxxxxx On xxx contrary xx used xxx same xxxxxxxxx to xxx advantage xxx gained xxxx attention xxx unsuspecting xxxxxxxxx His xxxxxx did xxx just xxxx with xxxxxxxxx They xxxx extended xx banks xxxxxxxx like xxxx he xxxxxxxxx eyewear xxx the xxxxxxxxx who xxxx the xxxxxxxx to xxx company xxxxxxxxxxx has xxx several xxxxxxxxx through xxxxxx experiences xxxxxxx their xxxxxxxxx practices xxxx his xxxxxxxxxxxxxx business xxxxxxx Vitaly xxxxxx has xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx he xxxxxx fully xxxxxxxxxx He xxxxx into xxxxxxxxxx situations xxx finds xxxx to xxxx them xx his xxxxx While xx has xxx to xxxxxxx in xxx venture xxxxxxxx he xxx attained x level xx accomplishment xxxx few xxx dare xx pursue xxx analysis xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx theories xxxx could xxxxxxx Vitaly xxxxxxxx actions xxx criticize xxxx Analyzing xxx case xxxx an xxxxxxx standpoint xxxxxx Borker xxx violated xxxxxxx aspects xx business xxxxxx with xxxx methods xxx business xxxxx The xxxxxxxx can xx studied xx applying xxx deontological xxxxxx which xxxx attention xx respect xxx life xxxxxxxx and xxxxx Alexander xxx Moore xxx morals xxx by xxxxxxxxxxxxx theory xxxxx faithfulness xx its xxxxx focus xxx stakeholder xx party xxx only xx what xxxx have xxxxxxxxxx promised xxxxx anything xxxxxx their xxxxxx actions xx considered x violation xx the xxxx of xxxxxx Borker xx failed xx meet xxx of xxx commitments xx the xxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxx counterfeit xxxxxxxx Further xxx company xxx dishonest xx its xxxxxxxxx dealings xxxx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxx merchants xx a xxxxx it xxx not xxxxx with xxx obligations xxx instead xxxxx to xxxxx the xxxxx stakeholders xx comply xxxx its xxxxxxx practices xxxxxxxxx must xx treated xxxx a xxxxxxxxx effort xx ensure xxxx obtain xxx highest xxxxxxx services xxxxxx Borker's xxxxxxxx towards xxxxxxx is xxx from xxxx He xxxxxxxxxx all xxxxxxx principles xxx even xxxxxxxxxx them xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx Kant xx is xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxx to xxx another xx accomplish xxxxx purposes xxx Vitaly xxxxxx violates xxxx idea xx deontological xxxxx changes xxx be xxxxxxx from xxx basic xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Still xx must xxxxx with x difference xx the xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxxx and xxx importance xx treating xxxx as xxx most xxxxxxxx part xx an xxxxxxxxxxxx Rather xxxx using xxxxx negative xxxxxxxxxxx as x marketing xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx appearances xx the xxxxxxxx DecorMyEyes xxx benefit xxxx respecting xxxxxxxx needs xxx being xxxxxx in xxxxx business xxxxxxxxxxxx On xxx contrary xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx from x utilitarian xxxxxxxxxxx there xx a xxxxxxxxxxx for x change xx attitude xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx Bentham xxxxxxx behavior xx more xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx This xxxxxx contradicts xxx just xxx ancient xxxxxxx of xxxxx standards xxx modern xxxxx about xxxxxx as xxxx In xxxxxxx times xxxxxx were xxxxxxx associated xxxx God xxx close-knit xxxx tradition xxxxxxxxx theory xxxxxxx morals xx utility xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xx act xxxxxxxx et xx While xxxx can xx studied xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx case xx DecorMyEyes xxxxxx Borker xxxxx have xxxx driven xx his xxxxxxx of xxxxx happy xx the xxxxxxx of xxx customers xx other xxxxx attaining xxxxxxxxx could xxxxxxx him xx violate xxx standards xx justice xxx a xxxxxxxxxxx justice xxx fairness xxx overshadowed xx the xxxx to xxxx happiness xxxxxx n x Consequences xxx acknowledged xxx are xxx a xxxxxxxx This xx the xxxxxxxxxxx flaw xx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Vitaly xxxxxx seems xx follow xxx ideology xxxxxxxxx above xx his xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx is xxxxx out xx the xxxxxx suggests xxxx happiness xx counted xxx same xx everyone xxx hence xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxxxxxx against xxxxxxxxxx Alexander x amp xxxxx M xxxxxxx Deontological xxxxxx Stanford xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Retrieved xxxx https xxxxx stanford xxx entries xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cressman x Brown x amp xxxxxxx F x December xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Introduction xx Philosophy xxxxxx Retrieved xxxx https xxxxx rebus xxxxxxxxx intro-to-phil-ethics xxxxxxx utilitarianism xxxxxx R x d xxxxxxxxx is xxxx Utilitarianism xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx www xxxxxxxxxxxxxx com xxxxxxxxxMore Articles From Business Law
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
