Question.900 - DDT (Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane), through consumption, can be easily absorbed in the body. The effects of the chemical have been considered toxic when ingested and hence have been banned in several countries, including the US. It can cause physical disturbances like vomiting, tremors, and even seizures if consumed at high doses. Further, it can lead to genetic modifications in some (Centers for Disease control and Prevention, 2021). In the case of using DDT, a powerful insecticide, corporations must take into account the potential harm to workers, neighboring landowners, and consumers. DDT leads to various health problems, including cancer, reproductive issues, and neurological disorders (Centers for Disease control and Prevention, 2021). Therefore, corporations have an ethical obligation to disclose the potential dangers of using DDT and take necessary precautions to minimize harm. Purchasing land in Mexico for agriculture poses tax advantages alongside the lack of DDT bans, leading to higher production at lower costs. However, importing and using agricultural products harvested with DDT is still a violation of the agriculture regulations in effect (McEvoy, 2022). Hence, the corporation must not purchase and use land in Mexico. The ethical responsibilities of corporations extend beyond maximizing profits and ensuring the satisfaction of shareholders. This is particularly true for multinational corporations operating in countries with different laws and regulations regarding health, safety, and the environment. Moreover, corporations must comply with environmental regulations in both Mexico and the USA. Corporations that fail to comply with environmental laws not only put the health and safety of people at risk but also damage the environment, leading to long-term consequences such as habitat destruction, soil erosion, and water pollution. Thus, the corporation must warn the employees, local people, and customers about the potential dangers of DDT and discourage its use. DDT manufacturers are also responsible for considering their product's potential harm, particularly when exporting to countries that do not ban its use. They should take steps to ensure that their product is used safely and appropriately. Further, the most appropriate course of action will be to collaborate in the research of finding new pesticides that are less harmful, low-cost, and sustainable for consumption within and outside the US. Environment protection is often seen at the opposite end of economic development, putting it in a position of being less prioritized. Environmental protection laws are not "less obvious" as they are essential to safeguarding human health and protecting the environment. Corporations must adhere to these laws and take environmental concerns into account when making business decisions. This includes conducting environmental impact assessments, reducing waste and emissions, and investing in sustainable practices. References: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, August 16). Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) factsheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/DDT_FactSheet.html McEvoy, P. by M. (2022, July 28). Organic 101: Allowed and prohibited substances. USDA. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2020/10/27/organic-101-allowed-and-prohibited-substances

Answer Below: