Question.5325 - HYPERLINK "https://ccis.ucourses.com/d2l/le/content/1039457/viewContent/5953984/View" \o "'Discussion 3' - Discussion Topic" Discussion 3Bottom of FormRead the “job interview” case at the beginning of the chapter 4 OR the “advertising team” case in chapter 5. Then select two of the “Questions for Review” below from its respective chapter to respond to. Include the text of the questions in your post and the topic of your case in the subject line of your post.Job InterviewHow do the intercultural dimensions discussed in the chapter serve as a framework for assessing the differences in communication patterns between the software design team and Martha? Where were the biggest sources of friction between the two?Martha and the design team were all fairly recent college graduates; all were either from generation X or the net generation. What are the main differences between these two groups and, if Martha had gotten the job, where would you expect to see the most serious communication challenges?The software team included one Hispanic member (Jorge) and one African American member (Scott). How might these co-cultural differences have created challenges with Martha, if she had gotten the job?If the software team and Martha had been more culturally tuned in, how might they have bridged their initial ethnocentric reactions? If you had been either Martha or one of the members of the team, and you had seen the entire interview disintegrating, is there anything you could have said or done to save it?Advertising TeamFrom what you know about the members of the ad team, to what extent do you think each member demonstrated communication apprehension, cognitive complexity, self-monitoring, and preference for procedural order? Give specific examples as evidence for your opinion.From what you know about the members of the ad team in the opening story, what do you think their Myers-Briggs ® dimensions are? Can you make an educated guess based on the descriptions of their behavior?From what you know about the members, what behavioral functions did each one perform, and how did these behavioral functions merge to shape each member’s role? Did there seem to be any roles missing that you think the team should have had? Did there seem to be any competition among members for a particular role?
Answer Below:
Case xxx InterviewQuestion xxx do xxx intercultural xxxxxxxxxx discussed xx the xxxxxxx serve xx a xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx patterns xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx design xxxx and xxxxxx Where xxxx the xxxxxxx sources xx friction xxxxxxx the xxx Marta x experience xxxxxx her xxx interview xx a xxxxxxx Valley xxxxxxxx company xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx role xxxx cultural xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx dynamics xxxx in xxxxxx decisions xxxxxxx being xxxxxxxxxxxxx articulate xxx professionally xxxxxxx Marta xxx rejected xx the xxxx not xxx to x lack xx technical xxxxxx but xxxxxxx of x cultural xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx failure xx integrate xxxx the xxxx s xxxxxxxx collaborative xxxxx Galanes xx al xxxx case xxxxxxxxxxx one xx the xxxxxxx ideas xxxx Chapter xxxxxxxxx within xxxxxx can xx a xxxxxxxx but xxxx when xxxxx members xxx aware xx and xxxx to xxxxxxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxx Marta xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx in xxx York xxxx followed xxxxx that xxx typical xx East xxxxx professional xxxxxxxx formal xxxxx fast-paced xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx self-presentation xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx Valley xxxx operated xxxxx different xxxxx casual xxxxx laid-back xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xx unspoken xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx egalitarian xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxx members xxxxxx than xxxxxxxxxxx Marta x communication xxxxx as xxxxxxxxxx influenced xxxxxx it xxxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxx lens xxxx judged xxx by xxxxx own xxxxxxxx standards xxxxxxxxxx that xxx talks xxx fast xxxxxx a xxx of xxxxxxx and xxx t x team xxxxxx These xxx not xxxxxxxxx truths xxx subjective xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx filtered xxxxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxxxxx As xxx text xxxxx effective xxxxx groups xxxxxxx members xx be xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx and xxxx up xxxxxxxxxxxxx assumptions xx order xx build xxxxxxxxxx collaboration xxxxxxx et xx Question xx the xxxxxxxx team xxx Martha xxx been xxxx culturally xxxxx in xxx might xxxx have xxxxxxx their xxxxxxx ethnocentric xxxxxxxxx If xxx had xxxx either xxxxxx or xxx of xxx members xx the xxxx and xxx had xxxx the xxxxxx interview xxxxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxx anything xxx could xxxx said xx done xx save xx The xxxx also xxxxxx to xxx idea xxxx culture xx not xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx Even xxxxxx the xxxx country xxxx as xxx U x significant xxxxxxxx differences xxxxx based xx region xxxxxxxxxxxx background xx educational xxxxxxxxxx Marta xxx the xxxx may xxxx spoken xxx same xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx in xxx same xxxxxxxx but xxxxx communication xxxxx diverged xxxxxxx To xxxxxxx outcomes xxxx Marta x rejection xxxxxxxxxxxxx should xxxxx teams xx intercultural xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx inclusive xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Marta xxx have xxxx an xxxxxxxxx candidate xxxx valuable xxxxx but xxx team x quick xxxxxxxx overlooked xxx potential xx the xxxxxxx emphasizes xxxxxxx teams xxxx higher xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx capacity xxx only xxxx communication xx managed xxxxxxxxxxx In xxx Marta x story xx a xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx in xxxxxxx workplaces xxxxxxx as xxxx on xxxxxxxx understanding xx it xxxx on xxxxxxxxxx skill xxxxx that xxxxxxx diversity xxxx open xxxxx can xxxxxx its xxxx potential xxxxx those xxxx cling xx narrow xxxxxxxxx risk xxxxxxx out xx talented xxxxxxxxxxx References xxxxxxx G x Adams x H xxxxxxxx J x Effective xxxxx discussion xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx No xxxxxMore Articles From HUMS 335