Question.5319 - Discussion 6Bottom of FormRead the “city officials” case at the beginning of chapter 9 and select two of the “Questions for Review” below to respond to. Include the text of the questions in your post. City Officials CaseHow systematic in its problem-solving approach did the O’Fallon group seem to be? Do you think they achieved the assembly effect?How well did they seem to meet the functions identified by the Functional Perspective as being necessary for good problem solving?What types of questions did the group have to deal with in the course of solving its problem? Do some types of questions seem harder to resolve than others? If so, which ones?What were the criteria against which the group compared its three realistic options? Why do you think the solution chosen—the membrane treatment facility—met the criteria better than the others? Where were the others weaker?How critical was the O’Fallon group’s thinking? What examples in the story lead you to that conclusion?Is there any evidence that the O’Fallon group’s problem-solving process experienced polarization or groupthink?
Answer Below:
Hello xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx I xxxx selected xxxxxxxxx and xxx review xxxx the xxxx study xxxxx at xxx beginning xx Chapter xxxxxxxx Question xxx systematic xx its xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx approach xxx the x Fallon xxxxx seem xx be xx you xxxxx they xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx effect xxx O xxxxxx group xxxxxxxx to xx highly xxxxxxxxxx in xxx problem-solving xxxxxxxx They xxxxx through xxx stages xx the xxxxxxxx Agenda xx reflective xxxxxxxx process xxxxx includes xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx setting xxxxx criteria xxxxxxxxxx alternatives xxx evaluating xxxxx alternatives xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxxx goals xxxxx use xx small xxxxx meetings xx define xxxxxxxx decision xxxxxxxx namely xxxx water xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx cost xxxxxxx demonstrates xxxxxxxxxx strategic xxxxxxxx The xxxxx also xxxxxxxxxx researched xxx compared xxxxx viable xxxxxxxxx interconnecting xxxx other xxxxxxxxx building x traditional xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx system xxxx careful xxxxxxxxxxx evaluation xxxxxxxx the xxxx that xxxx did xxx rush xx a xxxxxxxx but xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx critical xxxxxxxx Based xx this xx seems xxxxxx that xxx group xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx effect x situation xx which xxx group x decision xx better xxxx what xxx one xxxxxxxxxx could xxxx achieved xxxxx Their xxxxx decision xx build xxxxxxxx s xxxxx membrane xxxxxxxxx facility xxxxxxxx innovative xxxxxxxx that xxx not xxxx emerged xxxxxxx group xxxxxxxxxxxx Question xxxx were xxx criteria xxxxxxx which xxx group xxxxxxxx its xxxxx realistic xxxxxxx Why xx you xxxxx the xxxxxxxx chosen xxx membrane xxxxxxxxx facility xxx the xxxxxxxx better xxxx the xxxxxx Where xxxx the xxxxxx weaker xxx O xxxxxx city xxxxxxxxx compared xxx three xxxxxxx using xxx primary xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx high-quality xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx cost xxxxxxx These xxxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxx early xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx process xxx helped xx focus xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx future-oriented xxxxx The xxxxxxxx treatment xxxxxx was xxxxxxxxxx chosen xxxxxxx it xxxx satisfied xxxx criteria xxxxxxx its xxxxxx initial xxxx it xxxx fewer xxxxxxxxx which xxxxxxx long-term xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx liabilities xx also xxxxxxx O xxxxxx to xxxxxxxx control xxxx water xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx rather xxxx relying xx external xxxxxxxxx In xxxxxxxx purchasing xxxxx from xxxxx districts xxx more xxxxxxxxxx but xxxxxx cost xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx assurance xxx traditional xxxxx treatment xxxxx although xxxxxxx to xxxxx required xxxx chemicals xxx was xxxx vulnerable xx future xxxxxxxxxx changes xxxxxx it xxxx sustainable xxxx the xxxxxxxx system xxx the xxxx resilient xxx forward-thinking xxxxxx References xxxxxxx G x Adams x H xxxxxxxx J x Effective xxxxx discussion xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx No xxxxx ChapterMore Articles From HUMS 335
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
