Question.3444 - Week 2 Discussion 2 (Chapter 2) Reminder: You are assigned to the same group as you were in discussion #1. Group 1: Using the book and/or lecture material: What is the difference between a direct and indirect democracy or representative democracy? Why did the Founders choose a representative democracy (review book and lecture)? Are there any forms of a direct democracy in our political system? Do you feel there should be more opportunities for the people to directly participate in the policy making process at the state and federal level? Why or why not? After watching the assigned debate video (see the supplemental video link in this week's module), summarize at least two arguments presented by each side (total of 4). Finally, which side did you find most convincing and why? Group 2: Using the book and/or lecture: Discuss the basic principles and differences between the procedural and substantive models of democracy. Can these two models potentially be at odds with one another? Why? Should both models be pursued in our democratic system? Why or why not? NOTE: Please do not google these terms to come up with an answer. Use the book and lecture material. Include a discussion of the basic principles of each model. After watching the assigned debate video (see the supplemental video link in this week's module), summarize at least two arguments presented by each side (total of 4). Finally, which side did you find most convincing and why? Group 3: Using the book and/or lecture: As discussed in the lecture, the U.S. political system more closely resembles the pluralist model. Discuss how the pluralist model compares to the majoritarian and elite model. Do you think the pluralist model, as currently practiced in the United States, is democratic? If not, why? Feel free to include current political examples in your discussion. After watching the assigned debate video (see the supplemental video link in this week's module), summarize at least two arguments presented by each side (total of 4). Finally, which side did you find most convincing and why?
Answer Below:
I xxxxx ve xxxx assigned xx Group xxxxxxxx Principles xx Procedural xxx Substantive xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx procedural xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx has xxxxx core xxxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxxxx participation xxxxxxxx rule xxx political xxxxxxxx The xxxxxx principle xx this xx considered xx responsiveness xx the xxxxx hand xxxxxxxxxxx models xx democracy xxxx two xxxx principles xxxxx rights xxx liberties xxx social xxx economic xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx are xxxx on xxx basis xx substantive xxxxxxxxxxxx policies xxxxxxx Lecture xxxxx - xxxxxxxxxxx between xxxxx Two xxxxxxxxxxx two xxxxxx are xxxxxxx different xx each xxxxx as xxx substantive xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxx policies xxx on xxx other xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx model xxxxxxx on xxxxxx equality xxxxxxxxx Odds xx Each xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx behind xxxxxxxx them xx our xxxxxxxxx SystemIt xx also xxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxxx results xx policies xxxx are xxxxx unfavourable xx minorities xx they xxxxx mostly xx the xxxxxxxxx majority xxxxx making xxx decisions xxx substantive xxxxx focuses xxxxxx on xxx government xxxxxxxxx to xxxx policies xx that xxxxx communities xxx not xxxxxxxxx Chapter xxxxxxx Slide x In x democratic xxxxxx pursuing xxxx procedural xxx substantive xxxxxx is xxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx is xxx only xxxx but xxxx effective xx achieving xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx systems xxxx sure xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx decisions xx the xxxxx hand xxx substantive xxxxx is xxxxxxxxx with xxx outcomes xx decisions xxx just xxx processes xxxxx Question xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx present xxxxxx is xxxxx on xxxxxxx Democracy xx threatening xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx side xx this xxxxxx indicated xxx major xxxxxx which xxx be xxxxxxxxx as xxx erosion xx democratic xxxxx and xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx inequality xx the xxxxx hand xxx opposition xxxx of xxx present xxxxxx statement xxx pointed xxx two xxxxxxxx aspects xxxxxxxxx resilience xx democratic xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx engagement xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx org xxxx Convincing xxxxx am xxxx convinced xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx side xx the xxxxxxx democracy xx they xxxx addressed xx emerging xxxxx of xxxxxx inequality xx avoiding xxxxxx rsquo xxxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx framework xxxxxxxx it xxx been xxxxxxx with xxx study xx Schupmann xxxx the xxxxxxx of xxx democratic xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxxxx effects xx the xxxxxxx democracy xxxx threatens xxxxxxx Referenceshttps xxx intelligencesquaredus xxx debates xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xx external xxxx Roach xxxx Joe xxxxx s xxxxxxx Substantive xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Equality xxxx The xxxxxxx Court xxx Review xxxxxxx rsquo x Annual xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cases xxxxxxxxxx Vol xx Schupmann xxxxxxxx A xxxx Democracy xxxxxxx Itself xxxxxxx Constitutionalism xxx Militant xxxxxxxxx Oxford xxxxxxxxxx PressMore Articles From Political Science
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
