Question.665 - DISCUSSION QUESTION CHOICE #1: Argue for "Strong" Affirmative Action. Using either Utilitarianism or Rights Theory, and your own ethical judgments and experiences, make an ethical argument for the moral permissibility and obligation of "Strong" Affirmative Action. Use the arguments in this week’s readings; address counter arguments against your position; suggest a compromise position.DISCUSSION QUESTION CHOICE #2: Argue against "Strong" Affirmative Action. Using either Utilitarianism or Rights Theory and your own ethical judgments and experiences, make an ethical argument against the moral permissibility and obligation of "Strong" Affirmative Action. Use the arguments in this week’s readings; address counter arguments against your position; suggest a compromise position.DISCUSSION QUESTION CHOICE #3: Compromise? Perhaps you aren't convinced either way for or against. Where might a compromise be found? Use what you have learned in the first four weeks of the course, on liberty, rights, freedom, distributive justice, and your own ethical judgments and experiences to answer this ethical question. Use the arguments for and against the moral permissibility and obligation of "Strong" Affirmative Action in the readings. Address counter arguments to your argument. Suggest a compromise position between two opposing views.
Answer Below:
Choice xxxxxx affirmative xxxxxx is xxx of xxx privileges xx the xxxxxx States xxxxx opportunities xx education xxx employment xxx provided xxx minorities xxxx race xx not xxxxxx the xxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx racial xxxxxxxxxxxxxx but xxxxx are xxxxx categories xxxx are xxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxx action xxxx sexual xxxxxxxxxxx disability xxx and xxxxxxxxx I xx for xxxxxxxxxxx action xxxxxxx this xxxxxx will xxxxxxxx bring xxxxxx equality xxx provide xxxxx opportunities xx all xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx differences xxxxxx who xxx against xxxxxxxxxxx action xxxxx consider xxxx to xx a xxxxxxxxx for xxx minorities xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx are xxxx on xxx basis xx merit xxx on xxxxx gender xxx other xxxxxxxxxxx But x feel xxx to xxxx difference xxxx many xxxxxxxxx individuals xxx deprived xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx ldquo xxxxxx affirmative xxxxxx goes xxxxxx weak xxxxxxxxxxx action xx giving xx least xxxx sort xx preference xx the xxxxxxxx candidates xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxx being xxxxxxxxx rdquo xxxxx For xxxxxxxx colored xxxxxx are xxxxxx given xxxx preference xxxx the xxxxx ones xxxxxxxx people xxx given xxxx respect xxxx homosexuals xxxxx are xxx differences xxx discrimination xxx to xxxxx I xxxx affirmative xxxxxx should xx there xxx it xxxxxx continue xx promote xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx Rights xxxxxx is xxx apt xxxxxx to xxxxxxx affirmative xxxxxx because xxxxxx theory xxxxxx that xxxxx human xxxxx has xxx the xxxxxx since xxxx are xxxx and xxxxx should xxx be xxx reason xx provide xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Therefore xxxx rights xxxxxx it xx valid xxxx affirmative xxxxxx should xx applied xx society xx that xxxxx is x balance xx society xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx group xx always xxxxx more xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx While xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx approach xxxxx strong xxxxx affirmative xxxxxx will xx opposed xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx group xxxx not xx happy xxxx seeing xxx preference xxxxx to xxx minorities xxxx will xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxx entire xxxxxxx ReferenceMyers xxxxx G xxxx Psychology xx modules xxxxxxxxxMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
