Question.3960 - Discussion 12: The Courts No Groups! 1.How does the Supreme Court act as a check on the other two branches of government? Where does the power to do so stem from? You need to explain Marshall’s justification for judicial review. 2. Do you think the power of judicial review violates the principles of representative democracy? Why or why not? A simple no or yes answer is not sufficient. 3. First, provide a brief summary of the judicial philosophies and "tools" (such as history and text) used by Breyer and Scalia when deciding cases (this is located in the supplemental video and essays written by Breyer and Scalia), a short discussion highlighting at least 2 arguments presented by each, and connect to the concept of judicial restraint and activism (see textbook). Finally, in a separate paragraph, discuss which judicial philosophy (Scalia or Breyer) you agreed with and why? Please make sure to include in your discussion a list of the tools used by each.
Answer Below:
The xxxxxxx Court xx a xxxxx on xxx Legislative xxx Executive xxxxxxxxxx using xxx judicial xxxxxx authority xx declare xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx actions xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx Court xxxxxxx serves xx a xxxxx on xxx other xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx This xxxxx is xxxxxxx from xxx Constitution's xxxxxxx III xxxxx creates xxx judiciary xxx it xxx further xxxxxxxx by xxx famous xxxxxxx v xxxxxxx decision xxxxx Justice xxxx Marshall xxxxxxxx judicial xxxxxx in xxxx case xx stating xxxx it xx the xxxxxxxxxxx responsibility xx interpret xxx Constitution xxx make xxxx that xx law xx government xxxxxx goes xxxxxxx its xxxxxx Janda xxxxxxxx said xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx job xx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx authority xxxxx it xx the xxxxxxxx law xx the xxxx and xxxxxxx judicial xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx could xx undermined xx legislative xx executive xxxxxxxxx Does xxxxxxxx Review xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Democracy xxxx complicated xx determine xxxxxxx judicial xxxxxx infringes xx representative xxxxxxxxx Some xxxxxxx that xx guaranteeing xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx will xx represented xx elected xxxxxxxxx does xxx violate xxxxxxxxxxx rights xxx constitutional xxxxxxxxxxx judicial xxxxxx preserves xxx values xx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx democracy xxx judiciary xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx framework xxx protects xxx rights xx minorities xxxxxxx some xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx review xx undemocratic xxxxxxx it xxxxx unelected xxxxxx the xxxxx to xxxxxxx legislation xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxxxx elected xxxxxxxxxxx which xxx run xxxxxxx to xxx idea xx popular xxxxxxxxxx Judicial xxxxxx thus xxxxxxxx conflict xxxxxxx constitutional xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx rule xxxxx However xx my xxxxxxx even xxxxxx judicial xxxxxx gives x necessary xxxxxxxxx of xxx system xx balance xxx tyranny xx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx constitutional xxxxxxxxx Judicial xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Breyer xxx ScaliaPragmatism xxx originalism xxx two xxxxxxxx ideologies xxxx Justices xxxxxxx Breyer xxx Antonin xxxxxx represented xx a xxxxxx supporter xx originalism xxxxxxx Scalia xxxxxxxxxx that xxx Constitution xxxxxx be xxxx in xxxxxxxxxx with xxx original xxxxxxx of xxx document xx the xxxx it xxx drafted xx maintained xxxx judges xxxxxxxxx force xxxxx own xxxxxx or xxxxxx opinions xx constitutional xxxxxxxxxxxxxx since xx thought xxx meaning xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx was xxx in xxxxx Scalia xxxx extensive xxx of xxxxxxxxx such xx historical xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx research xx bolster xxx methodology xxx emphasis xxx on xxxxxxxx restraint xxx what xxx Constitution's xxxxxxxx meant xxxx they xxxx drafted xxxxxx a xxxxxxx specifically xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx he xxxxxxxx that xxx judiciary xxxxxx submit xx the xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx departments xxxxx Scalia's xxxxxxx contention xxx that xxxxxxxx activism xxxxxxxxxx democratic xxxxxxxxxx allowing xxxxxxxxx judges xx make xxxxxx decisions xxxx should xx reserved xxx elected xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx By xxxxxxxx strictly xx the xxxxxxxx meaning xx sought xx prevent xxx judiciary xxxx overstepping xxx bounds xxx engaging xx policymaking xxxxxxx Breyer xx the xxxxx hand xxxxxxx a xxxx practical xxxxxxxx stressing xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx is x living xxxx that xxx change xx meet xxx demands xx modern xxxxxxx Breyer xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx interpreting xxxxx constitutional xxxxxxxxxx judges xxxxx to xxxx the xxxxxx intent xxx ramifications xx their xxxxxxxxx into xxxxxxx He xxxxxxx that xxxxxx than xxxxx limited xxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx context xxx meaning xx the xxxx should xx understood xx a xxx that xxxxxxxx democratic xxxxxx and xxx general xxxx Breyer xxxxxxxx a xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx including xxx text's xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx applications xx court xxxxxxx and xxx changing xxxxxx landscape xxxxx He xxxxxxxxxx that x strict xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx can xxxxxxx unfair xxxxxxx that xxxxx take xxxx account xxxxxxxxxxxx circumstances xxxxxx he xxxxxx that xxx Constitution xxxxx to xx flexible xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx rights xxx principles xxxxxx relevant xxxxx his xxxxxxxx is xxxxx criticized xx judicial xxxxxxxx Breyer xxx it xx necessary xx uphold xxx Constitution xxxxx s xxxxxx and xxxxxx it xxxxxxxxx to xxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx society xxxxxxxxxxx After xxxxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxx I xxxxx Justice xxxxxxxx practical xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx Since xxx Constitution xxx created xx last xx is xxxxxxxxx that xxx interpretation xxxx into xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx social xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Although x value xxxxxxx Scalia's xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxxx predictability xxx the xxxx of xxx Breyer's xxxxxxxxx to xxx text's xxxx and xxxxxxxxxx applications xxxxx sure xxxx constitutional xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx to xxx issues xxxx strategy xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxx development xxx enables xx to xxxxxx rights xx a xxxxxxx that xx dynamic xxx ever-evolving xx the xxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx democracy xxxxxxxx most xxxx striking x balance xxxxxxx rigorous xxxxxxxxx to xxx text xxx an xxxxxxxxx goal-driven xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Each xxxxxxxxx instruments xxxx attention xx their xxxxxxxxx opinions xxxxxx relied xx textualism xxx historical xxxxxxx while xxxxxx focused xx purpose xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx evolving xxxxxx of xxxxxxx ReferencesJanda x The xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx American xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx politics xxxx No xxxxxMore Articles From Political Science
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
