Question.3961 - Discussion 13 Chapter 15 Part 1 NOTE: For this last week only one reply post per discussion is required. This is the first of two discussions on Chapter 15. Group 1: 1. The Bill of Rights originally applied and limited only the federal government. Please discuss how the Bill of Rights became applicable to the states through the process of selective incorporation. Make sure to discuss the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause, the Gitlow v New York case, the Palko v Connecticut case and the fundamental freedom test. Group 2: Discuss the Court's interpretation and application of the Establishment Clause. After your summary, take a look at the case of the Ten Commandments being displayed in Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma. Why did the court uphold the display in Texas as constitutional, but declare the display in Kansas and Oklahoma to be unconstitutional (see lecture material)? Do you think the court struck the ride balance in these two cases (explain)? Group 3: 3. Discuss, using specific court cases for examples, the following statement: The Free Exercise Clause protects your liberty to believe whatever you want, but not necessarily to practice those beliefs. Do you think the Court has struck a good balance between individual liberty and order when it comes to the free exercise clause? Why or why not? All GROUPS: 4. Your right to freedom of speech (including symbolic speech) is not absolute. Discuss the Court's interpretation and application of the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. Make sure to discuss the concept of the Clear and Present danger test and its evolution (Dangerous Tendency Test. Gravity of Evil Test, etc.). Finally, find, summarize and share an article related to free speech on college campuses. What, if anything, do you think colleges should do to prevent hate speech on campus? Why?
Answer Below:
Group xxx Establishment xxxxxx and xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx CasesThe xxxxx Amendment's xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xxxxxxx the xxxxx from xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx religion xx has xxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxx significant xxxxx before xxx U x Supreme xxxxx which xxx been xxxxx to xxxx lines xxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxx symbols xxx government xxxxxxxxxx Janda xxxxxxx Interpretation xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xxx Court xxx generally xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xx two xxxxxxx ways xxx Lemon xxxx Lemon x Kurtzman xxx Lemon xxxx has xxxxx prongs xxx government xxxxxx must xxxx a xxxxxxx purpose xxx government xxxxxx must xxx have xxx primary xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx religion xxx government xxxxxx must xxx result xx excessive xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx Test xxxxx v xxxxxxxx This xxxx examines xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx observer xxxxx perceive xxx government x action xx endorsing x particular xxxxxxxx Historical xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx In xxxx cases xxx Court xxx also xxxxxxxxxx historical xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx as xxxx of xxx analysis xx whether x government xxxxxx violates xxx Establishment xxxxxx Case xx the xxx Commandments xxxxxxxx in xxxxx Kansas xxx OklahomaThe x S xxxxxxx Court's xxxxxxxxx on xxx display xx the xxx Commandments xx public xxxxxx like xxxxxxxxxx buildings xxxx based xx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxx case xxxxx Van xxxxx v xxxxx The xxx Commandments xxxxxxxx on xxx grounds xx the xxxxx State xxxxxxx was xxxxxxxx by xxx Court xx the xxxx of xxx Orden x Perry xxxxx Justice xxxxxxxxxxx majority xxxxxx highlighted xxx monument's xxxxxxx history xxxx than xxxxx and xxx inclusion xx a xxxxxxx historical xxxxxxx that xxxx featured xxxxx monuments xxxx secular xxxxxxxx The xxxxx determined xxxx the xxxxxxx did xxx violate xxx Establishment xxxxxx by xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx practices xxx traditions xxxxxxxxx as xx reflected xxx state's xxxxxxxxxx recognition xx religious xxxxxxxx rather xxxx an xxxxxxxxxxx of x particular xxxxxxxx Janda xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx McCreary xxxxxx v xxxx In xxxxxxxx the xxxxx ruled xx McCreary xxxxxx v xxxx that xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxxx exhibition xx Kentucky's xxxxxx courthouses xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx in xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx was xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx concluded xxxx rather xxxx being x part xx a xxxxxx historical xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx were xxxxx to xxxxxxx religious xxxxxxx The xxxxx pointed xxx that xxxxx exhibits xxxxxxx just xxxxxxxxxx relics xxxx were xxx there xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx religion xxx the xxxxxxx Ruling xxx Different xxx purpose xx the xxxxxxxx was xxx primary xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx Kansas xxxxxxxx case xxx the xxxxx case xxx Court xx Texas xxxxxxxxxx that xxx display xxx part xx a xxxxxx secular xxxxxxxxxx context xxxxxx than xxxxx meant xx promote xxxxxxxx Conversely xx Kansas xxx Oklahoma xxx Court xxxxxxxxxx that xxx main xxxx of xxxxxxxxxx religious xx they xxxx placed xxxxx litigation xxxx whether xxxx displays xxxx constitutional xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxx agenda xxxxxxx Struck xx the xxxxx The xxxxxxx decisions xx these xxxxx strike x compromise xxxxxxx upholding xxxxxxx customs xxx prohibiting xxx promotion xx religion xx the xxxxx The xxx Commandments xxxxxxxx in xxxxx was xxxxxx to xx constitutional xxx to xxx historical xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx character xxx Court xxxxx that xxx displays xxxx illegal xx Kansas xxx Oklahoma xxxxxxx it xxx more xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxx activities xxxx might xx seen xx endorsing xxxxxxxxx belief xxx could xxxxxxx that xxx subjective xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx intent xx these xxxxxxxxxx leads xx inconsistent xxxxxxxxxxx even xxxxxx the xxxxxxx distinction xxxxxxx reasonable xxxxx the xxxxx Clarity xx this xxxxxx might xxxxxx from x more xxxxxxxxxxxx standard xxxxxxx of xxxxxx and xxx LimitationsThe xxxxx Amendment xxxxxxxxxx freedom xx speech xxxxxxxxx symbolic xxxxxx However xxxx right xx not xxxxxxxx Over xxxx the xxxxx has xxxxxxxxx various xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxx speech xxxxxxxxxxxx when xxxxxx poses x threat xx public xxxxx or xxxxxxxx security xxxxx and xxxxxxx Danger xxxx The xxxxx and xxxxxxx Danger xxxx was xxxxx articulated xx Schenck x United xxxxxx where xxx Court xxxxx that xxxxxx could xx restricted xx it xxxxx a xxxxx and xxxxxxx danger xx inciting xxxxxxx activities xxxx test xxx used xx evaluate xxxxxxx speech xxxxx an xxxxxxxx threat xxxx outweighed xxx value xx protecting xxxx speech xxxxxxxxx of xxx Clear xxx Present xxxxxx Test xxxxxxxxx Tendency xxxx Gitlow x New xxxx This xxxx broadened xxx scope xx speech xxxxxxxxxxxx allowing xxxxxx to xx limited xx it xxx a xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx illegal xxxxxxxxxx even xx it xxxx t xxxx an xxxxxxxxx threat xxxxxxx of xxxx Test xxxxxx v xxxxxx States xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx during xxx Cold xxx the xxxxx ruled xxxx speech xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx if xx posed x significant xxxxxx to xxxxxxxx security xxxx if xxx danger xxx not xxxxxxxxx Brandenburg xxxx Brandenburg x Ohio xxx current xxxxxxxx which xxxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxxxxxx Danger xxxx is xxxx speech xxx only xx restricted xx it xxxxxxx imminent xxxxxxx action xxx is xxxxxx to xxxxxxx such xxxxxx This xxxx provides xxxx protection xxx free xxxxxx while xxxxxxxxx it xxxxxxx public xxxxxx Freedom xx Speech xx College xxxxxxxxxxxx speech xx college xxxxxxxx has xxxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxx topic xxxxxxxxxxxx when xx comes xx hate xxxxxx Colleges xxxx strike x balance xxxxxxx defending xxxx speech xxx making xxxx that xxxxxxxx are xxxxxxx with xxxxxxx and xxxxxx on xxxxxx The xxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx free xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx hate xxxxxx on xxxxxxx campuses xx covered xx a xxx York xxxxx story xxxxx some xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxx ought xx do xxxx to xxxxxxx hate xxxxxx particularly xxxx which xxxxxxx underrepresented xxxxxx others xxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxx speech xxxx when xx contains xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxxx viewpoints xxxxxx Colleges xxxxxxx Hate xxxxxx Colleges xxxxxx in xx opinion xxxx sure xxxx their xxxxxxxx strike x balance xxxxxxx student xxxxxxx and xxxx expression xxxx speech xx essential xxx it xxxxxxxxx be xxxxxxxxx if xx encourages xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxx Without xxxxx against xxx First xxxxxxxxx colleges xxx take xxxxxx to xxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxxx where xxx students xxxx comfortable xxxx can xxxxxxx creating xxxx areas xxxxxxxxxx inclusive xxx respectful xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx disciplinary xxxxxxx against xxxxxxxx who xxx offensive xxxxxxxx Colleges xxxxxx encourage x free xxxxxxxx of xxxxx but xxxx does xxx imply xxxxxxxx speech xxxx compromises xxx safety xxx dignity xx others xxxxxxxxxx Janda xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx American xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx politics xx TitleMore Articles From Political Science
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
