Question.3961 - Discussion 13 Chapter 15 Part 1 NOTE: For this last week only one reply post per discussion is required. This is the first of two discussions on Chapter 15. Group 1: 1. The Bill of Rights originally applied and limited only the federal government. Please discuss how the Bill of Rights became applicable to the states through the process of selective incorporation. Make sure to discuss the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause, the Gitlow v New York case, the Palko v Connecticut case and the fundamental freedom test. Group 2: Discuss the Court's interpretation and application of the Establishment Clause. After your summary, take a look at the case of the Ten Commandments being displayed in Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma. Why did the court uphold the display in Texas as constitutional, but declare the display in Kansas and Oklahoma to be unconstitutional (see lecture material)? Do you think the court struck the ride balance in these two cases (explain)? Group 3: 3. Discuss, using specific court cases for examples, the following statement: The Free Exercise Clause protects your liberty to believe whatever you want, but not necessarily to practice those beliefs. Do you think the Court has struck a good balance between individual liberty and order when it comes to the free exercise clause? Why or why not? All GROUPS: 4. Your right to freedom of speech (including symbolic speech) is not absolute. Discuss the Court's interpretation and application of the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. Make sure to discuss the concept of the Clear and Present danger test and its evolution (Dangerous Tendency Test. Gravity of Evil Test, etc.). Finally, find, summarize and share an article related to free speech on college campuses. What, if anything, do you think colleges should do to prevent hate speech on campus? Why?
Answer Below:
Group xxx Establishment xxxxxx and xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx CasesThe xxxxx Amendment's xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xxxxxxx the xxxxx from xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx religion xx has xxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxx significant xxxxx before xxx U x Supreme xxxxx which xxx been xxxxx to xxxx lines xxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxx symbols xxx government xxxxxxxxxx Janda xxxxxxx Interpretation xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xxx Court xxx generally xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xx two xxxxxxx ways xxx Lemon xxxx Lemon x Kurtzman xxx Lemon xxxx has xxxxx prongs xxx government xxxxxx must xxxx a xxxxxxx purpose xxx government xxxxxx must xxx have xxx primary xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx religion xxx government xxxxxx must xxx result xx excessive xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx Test xxxxx v xxxxxxxx This xxxx examines xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx observer xxxxx perceive xxx government xxxxx s xxxxxx as xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx religion xxxxxxxxxx Practices xxx Traditions xx some xxxxx the xxxxx has xxxx considered xxxxxxxxxx practices xxx traditions xx part xx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx action xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xxxx of xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx Displays xx Texas xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx U x Supreme xxxxxxx decisions xx the xxxxxxx of xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx spaces xxxx government xxxxxxxxx vary xxxxx on xxx specifics xx each xxxx Texas xxx Orden x Perry xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx monument xx the xxxxxxx of xxx Texas xxxxx Capitol xxx affirmed xx the xxxxx in xxx case xx Van xxxxx v xxxxx Chief xxxxxxx Rehnquist's xxxxxxxx ruling xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx lengthy xxxxxxx more xxxx years xxx its xxxxxxxxx in x broader xxxxxxxxxx exhibit xxxx also xxxxxxxx other xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx meanings xxx Court xxxxxxxxxx that xxx display xxx not xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx Clause xx using xxx historical xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx reasoning xx it xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx historical xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx heritage xxxxxx than xx endorsement xx a xxxxxxxxxx religion xxxxx Kansas xxx Oklahoma xxxxxxxx County x ACLU xx contrast xxx Court xxxxx in xxxxxxxx County x ACLU xxxx the xxx Commandments' xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxxxx mdash xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx in xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx mdash xxx unconstitutional xxx Court xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx than xxxxx a xxxx of x larger xxxxxxxxxx tradition xxx exhibits xxxx meant xx further xxxxxxxxx beliefs xxx Court xxxxxxx out xxxx these xxxxxxxx weren't xxxx historical xxxxxx they xxxx put xxxxx specifically xx promote xxxxxxxx Why xxx Court's xxxxxx Was xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx of xxx displays xxx the xxxxxxx distinction xxxxxxx the xxxxxx Oklahoma xxxx and xxx Texas xxxx The xxxxx in xxxxx determined xxxx the xxxxxxx was xxxx of x larger xxxxxxx historical xxxxxxx rather xxxx being xxxxx to xxxxxxx religion xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx the xxxxx determined xxxx the xxxx goal xx displaying xxxxxxxxx as xxxx were xxxxxx after xxxxxxxxxx over xxxxxxx such xxxxxxxx were xxxxxxxxxxxxxx indicating x religious xxxxxx Balance xxxxxx by xxx Court xxx Court's xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx cases xxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx ancient xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx by xxx state xxx Ten xxxxxxxxxxxx monument xx Texas xxx deemed xx be xxxxxxxxxxxxxx due xx its xxxxxxxxxx significance xxx longstanding xxxxxxxxx The xxxxx ruled xxxx the xxxxxxxx were xxxxxxx in xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx because xx was xxxx concerned xxxx government xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx be xxxx as xxxxxxxxx religious xxxxxx One xxxxx contend xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx nature xx assessing xxxxxx in xxxxx situations xxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx application xxxx though xxx Court's xxxxxxxxxxx appears xxxxxxxxxx given xxx facts xxxxxxx on xxxx matter xxxxx result xxxx a xxxx standardized xxxxxxxx Freedom xx Speech xxx Its xxxxxxxxxxxxxx First xxxxxxxxx guarantees xxxxxxx of xxxxxx including xxxxxxxx speech xxxxxxx this xxxxx is xxx absolute xxxx time xxx Court xxx developed xxxxxxx tests xxx standards xx determine xxx limits xx free xxxxxx particularly xxxx speech xxxxx a xxxxxx to xxxxxx order xx national xxxxxxxx Clear xxx Present xxxxxx Test xxx Clear xxx Present xxxxxx test xxx first xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx v xxxxxx States xxxxx the xxxxx ruled xxxx speech xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx if xx posed x clear xxx present xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx illegal xxxxxxxxxx This xxxx was xxxx to xxxxxxxx whether xxxxxx posed xx imminent xxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx free xxxxxx Evolution xx the xxxxx and xxxxxxx Danger xxxx Dangerous xxxxxxxx Test xxxx Gitlow x New xxxx This xxxx broadened xxx scope xx speech xxxxxxxxxxxx allowing xxxxxx to xx limited xx it xxx a xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx illegal xxxxxxxxxx even xx it xxxx rsquo x pose xx immediate xxxxxx Gravity xx Evil xxxx nbsp xxxxxx v xxxxxx States xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx during xxx Cold xxx the xxxxx ruled xxxx speech xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx if xx posed x significant xxxxxx to xxxxxxxx security xxxx if xxx danger xxx not xxxxxxxxx Brandenburg xxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxxxx v xxxx The xxxxxxx standard xxxxx replaced xxx Clear xxx Present xxxxxx test xx that xxxxxx can xxxx be xxxxxxxxxx if xx incites xxxxxxxx lawless xxxxxx and xx likely xx produce xxxx action xxxx test xxxxxxxx more xxxxxxxxxx for xxxx speech xxxxx balancing xx against xxxxxx safety xxxxxxx of xxxxxx on xxxxxxx CampusesFree xxxxxx on xxxxxxx campuses xxx been x controversial xxxxx particularly xxxx it xxxxx to xxxx speech xxxxxxxx must xxxxxx a xxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx free xxxxxx and xxxxxx sure xxxx students xxx treated xxxx dignity xxx safety xx campus xxx conflict xxxxxxx defending xxxx speech xxx suppressing xxxx speech xx college xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxx in x New xxxx Times xxxxx While xxxx contend xxxx universities xxxxx to xx more xx prevent xxxx speech xxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx targets xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx groups xxxxxx stress xxx value xx free xxxxxx even xxxx it xxxxxxxx divisive xx objectionable xxxxxxxxxx Should xxxxxxxx Prevent xxxx Speech xxxxxxxx should xx my xxxxxxx make xxxx that xxxxx policies xxxxxx a xxxxxxx between xxxxxxx welfare xxx free xxxxxxxxxx Free xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx but xx shouldn't xx protected xx it xxxxxxxxxx violence xx bigotry xxxxxxx going xxxxxxx the xxxxx Amendment xxxxxxxx can xxxx action xx foster xx environment xxxxx all xxxxxxxx feel xxxxxxxxxxx This xxx involve xxxxxxxx safe xxxxx delivering xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx instruction xxx enforcing xxxxxxxxxxxx actions xxxxxxx students xxx use xxxxxxxxx language xxxxxxxx should xxxxxxxxx a xxxx exchange xx ideas xxx that xxxx not xxxxx allowing xxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx and xxxxxxx of xxxxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxx Kenneth xxx challenge xx democracy xxxxxxxx government xx global xxxxxxxx No xxxxxMore Articles From Political Science
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
