Question.2275 - Topic 1: Does God Exist? God Arguments & William James I) Q&A: The first topic for the Week Four discussion is Does God Exist? The word-count requirement for each Q&A is loosely set at a minimum of 250 words; however, a Q&A post of fewer than 150 words will receive no credit. Compose and answer an original question based on the Week Three required readings. Your question should address the writings, ideas, and theories of one of the following philosophers: God Arguments William James
Answer Below:
Week xxxxxxxx Evaluate xxx ontological xxxxxxxx for xxxxx existence xx it x logically xxxxx argument xx does xx rely xx flawed xxxxxxxxxxx What xxx the xxxxxxxxx objections xx the xxxxxxxxxxx argument xxx how xxxxx a xxxxxxxxx respond xx them xxxxxxx James xxxxxxx James xxxxxx for x pragmatic xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx belief xxxx does xxxx mean xxxxxxxxx to xxxxx under xxxx conditions xx it xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx in xxx even xxxxxxx conclusive xxxxxxxx Answer xxxxxxxxxxx Taxonomy xx the xxxxxxxxxxx argument xx favor xx God's xxxxxxxxx from xxx notion xxxx God xx being xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx perfection xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx being xxxxxxxxxx results xx proving xxxxx existence xxx meaning xx God xxx be xxxxxxxx through xxxxxxxxx experience xxx word xxxxxx gets xx meaning xxxx if xxxxx is xxxxxxxxx Oppy xxxxxxxxxxx it xxxxx various xxxxxxxxxx like xxx much xx relies xx the xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx whom xxx proposals xxx intended xxx ontological xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxx toward xxxxxxxx or xxxx agnostics xx have xxxx converted xxxxxxx theists xx even xxxx theists xxxxxxx their xxxxxxxx positioning xxxx philosophy xx attacked xxxx an xxxxxxxxxxx argument xx advance xxx understanding xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx logical xxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx considering xxx existence xx God xx a xxxx predicate xxxx definitions xxxx have xxxxxxxxxxx import xx varied xxxxx Matthews xxxxxxxx existence xxxxx to xx essential xx supplicate xxxxxxxxx completion x being xxxx lacks xxxxxxxxx is xxxx perfect xxxx that xxxxxx so xxxxxxx ontological xxxxxxxx entirely xxxxxxx on xxx acceptance xx its xxxxxxxx for xxxx several xxxxx this xxxxxx remained x point xx contention xxxxx philosophers xx ontological xxxxxxxx tends xx ask x person xx assume xxxx their xxx to xx the xxxxxxxx conceivable xxxxx while xxxxxxxxxx existence xx something xxxxxxx of xxx mind xxxx is xx reality xx greater xxxx the xxx that xxxxxx in xxxx Oppy xxxxxxx James x renowned xxxxxxxx philosopher xxxxxx the xxxx s xxxxxxxxx The xxxx To xxxxxxx lecture xxxx justified xxxxx as x defense xx one's xxxxx to xxxxx a xxxxxxxxx attitude xx religious xxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxx fact xxxx our xxxxxx logical xxxxxxxxx may xxx have xxxx coerced xxxxx intends xx depict x defensive xxxxxxxx in xxxxx for xxxxxxx with xxx notion xxxx faith xx a xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx James xxxx Williams's xxxxxxxxxxxxx perspective xxx could xxxxxxx adopting xx a xxxxxx without xxxxxx prior xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx such xx one xxxxx possibly xxxxxx access xx supporting xxxxxxxx only xxxxx they xxxx adopted x particular xxxxxx while xx the xxxxx hand xxxxx adoption xx the xxxxxx could xxxxx their xxxxxx to xx true xxxxx is xxx case xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx when xx comes xx religious xxxxxx that xxxxxxx shape xxxxx adoption xx the xxxxxx James xxxx this xxxxxxxxxxxxx James xxxxx to xxxxx that xxx could xxxxxxx in xxx if xx produces x positive xxxxxx without xxxxxxxxx harming xxxxxx and xxxx aids xx navigating xxx world xxxx meaningfully xx summary xxxxxxxxxx belief xx God xxx be xxxxxxxxxxxx only xx it xxxxxx by xxx following xxxxxxxxxx firstly xxxx option xx living xxxxx that xxx belief xx a xxxxxxx possibility xx the xxxxxxxxxx James xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx being xxxxxx between xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx has xxxx consequences xxxxxxx Williams xxxxx to xxxxxxx that xxx questions xx possessing xxxxxxx beliefs xx all xx not xxxxxx them xxxxxxx on xxxxx will xxxxxxx moral xxxxxxxxxx could xxxx be xxxxxx by xxxxxxx reasoning xxxxxx than xxxxxxxxxxxx skepticism xx using xxxxxxx wherein xxx choices xxx make xxxxxx be xxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxx evidence xxxxx James xxxxxxx momentous xxxxxx means xxxx decisions xxxx to xxxx significant xxxxxxxx or xxxxx implications xx James xxxxxxxx states xxxxxx tend xx rely xx one's xxxxxxx while xxxxx relies xx desires xxxx this xxxxxxxxxxxxx we xxx claim xxxx James's xxxxxxxxxx doesn't xxxx on xxxxxxx God's xxxxxxxxx rather xx emphasizes xxx transformative xxxxx of xxxxx in xxxxxxxx lives xxxxxxxxxx James x Does' xxxxxxxxxxxxxx exist xxx Journal xx philosophy xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx methods x James x The xxxx to xxxxxxx In xxxxxxx About xxxxxxxxx pp x Routledge xxxxxxxx G x The xxxxxxxxxxx argument xxx Blackwell xxxxx to xxx Oppy x Ontological xxxxxxxxx Stanford xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Available xx https xxxxx stanford xxx entries xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Accessed xxxMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
