Question.5561 - Imagine the veil of ignorance that John Rawls described. If you were behind this veil of ignorance, what policies or measures would you advocate for in your country and why? Do you think John Rawls has found a way to determine what is in fact just for a society? Justify your answer with examples. Thomas Hobbes argued that people should give up some of their freedoms to ensure collective security. Describe any situations in your daily life where you have to give up certain freedoms for safety and order in your community. Do you think it’s worth it? Why or why not? John Rawls sees self-interest or egoism as obscuring our vision of what is just or right. This is fundamentally opposed to the principles of ethical egoism. In your opinion, can people motivated by self-interest see clearly what is just in any given situation? Explain your reasoning.
Answer Below:
Rawls, Hobbes, and EgoismRawls’ Veil of Ignorance and Policy AdvocacyJohn Rawls' veil of ignorance has us envisioning social rules that would have to...
Rawls xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Veil xx Ignorance xxx Policy xxxxxxxxxxxx Rawls' xxxx of xxxxxxxxx has xx envisioning xxxxxx rules xxxx would xxxx to xx drawn xxxxxxx knowing xxxx position xxx is xxxxx to xxxxxx in xxxxxxx Matthews xxxxxxxxx If x were xxxxxx that xxxx I xxxxx argue xx favor xx policies xxxxxxxxx equal xxxxxx to xxxxxxx education xxx healthcare xxxxx no xxx could xxxx at xxxxx whether xxxx would xxxx privilege xx poverty xxx example xxxxxxxxx education xxxxxxxx would xxxxxx that xxx students xxxx a xxxx chance xx succeed xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx background xx much xxx same xxx as xxxxxxxxxxx rights xx universal xxxxxx care xxxxx protect xxxxx who xxxxxx to xx born xxxx chronic xxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxx disadvantage x would xxxx support xxx establishment xx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx tax xxxxxx that xxxxx public xxxxx consonant xxxx Rawls xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx allowing xxx inequality xxxx if xx serves xx benefit xxx least-well-off xx society xxxxx Under xxxx veil xx self-advantageous xxxxxxxx I xxxx try xx arm xxxxxx with xxxxxx nets xxxx protect xxx only xxx liberties xx a xxxxxx few xxx the xxxxx liberties xx all xxx Rawls xxxxx a xxx to xxxxxxxxx Justice xxxxxxxx Rawls' xxxxxx of xxxxxxx is x very xxxxxxxx procedural xxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx fairness xx is xxxx heavily xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxx position xx Rawl's xxxx of xxxxxxx should xxxxxx impartiality xx making xxxxxxxxxxx ignorant xx personal xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx compelling xxxx to xxxxxx just xxxxxxxxxx from x neutral xxxxxxxxxx BBC xxxxx This xxxxxxxxx will xx used xx build x perfect xxxxxxx in xxx sense xx balancing xxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx For xxxxxxx under xxx veil xxxx policies xx anti-discrimination xx work xxx justified xxxxxxx the xxxx principles xxx would xxx agree xx be xxxxxxxxxxxxxx disadvantaged xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx defined xx a xxxxxxxxxxxx group xxx critics xxxxxxx are xxxx that xxxxx assumes xxxxx the xxxx that xxxxxx will xxx rationally xxx on xxxxxxxx considerations xxx not xxxxxxxxxxx Russell xxxxxxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxx by xxxxx offers xxx of xxx best xxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx justice xxxxxxx it xxxxxxxxx liberty xxx equality xx forms xxxx ethical xxxxxx cannot xxxxxxxx Hobbes xxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx Hobbes xxxxxxxxxxx must xxxxxxxxx some xxxxxxxx freedoms xx ensure xxxxxxxxxx security xxxxxxxx Hendricks xx life xx example xx this xxxxx be xxxxxxx laws xxxx is x cannot xxxx freely xxxxx at xxxxxxxx speed xx even xxxxxx traffic xxxxxx instead xxxxx are xxxxxxx rules xx follow xx protect xxxxx driver xxx pedestrian xxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxx is xxxx an xxxxxxxxxx against xxxxxxxx freedoms xx that xxxx can xxxxx public xxxxxx threats xxxx applications xxxxx be xxxxxxx but xxxx create xxxxxxxxxxx order xxx reduce xxxxx of xxxx Such xxxxx would xxxxxxxxx lead xx what xxxxxx called x state xx nature xxxxxxxxxx of xxxx and xxxxxxxx Thus xx is x fair xxx useful xxxxxxxxxx to xxxx up xxxx freedoms xxx safety xxx Self-Interest xxxxxxxxx Justice xxxxx argues xxxx self-interest xxxxxxxx justice xx ways xxxxxxxx opposed xx what xxxxxxx egoism xxxxxxx Matthews xxxxxxxxx Ethical xxxxxx holds xxxx only xxxxx actions xxx moral xxxxx benefit xxxxx self xx approach xx limited xxxx it xxxxxx account xxx considerations xx impartial xxxxxxxx Russell xxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxxx egoism xxx view xxxx all xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx self-interested xxxx not xxxxxxx ethical xxxxxx and xxx even xx in xxxxxxxx with xx In xx opinion xxxxxxxxxxxxx can xxxxxxxxx support xxxxxxx but xxxx can xxxx occur xxxxxxxxxxxx Thus x businessperson xxx raise xxxxx to xxxxxxx or xxxxxx employees xxxxxxxxxx workers xxx society xxxxx yet xxx reason xxxxx remains xxxxxxxxxxxxx Genuine xxxxxxx needs x wider xxxxx vision xxxx as xxxx articulated xx Rawls xxxxxxx regarding xxx so-called xxxx of xxxxxxxxx Without xxx corrective xx justice x self-interested xxx may xxxx open xx opportunity xxx violating xxx rights xx some xx people xxxx their xxxxxxx on xxxxxx only xxxx are xxxxxx to xxxxxxx protecting xxx interests xx vulnerable xxxxxx because xxxxxxx requires xxxxxxxxxx and xx interest xxxxxx self-promotion xxxxxxxxxxxxx veil xx ignorance xxxxxxxx by xxxxx urges xx to xxxxxxxx justice xx detached xxxx one x own xxxxxxxxxxxx be x framework xx fairness xxxxxxx even xx unequal xxxxxxxxx While xxxxxx reminds xx that xxxx freedoms xxxx be xxxxx up xxx the xxxx of xxxxxxxxxx security xxxxx extends xxxx denial xx urging xxxxxxxxxxxx as x principle xxxx in xxx calculation xx justice xxxxxxx egoism xxxxxx serve xxx purpose xx grounding xxxxxxxx on xxx acceptable xxxxxxxx since xx definition xx enjoining xxxx moral xxxx fairness xxxx always xx set xxxxx for xxx sake xx self-interest xxxxxxxx imperfect xx its xxxxxxxxxxxx Rawls' xxxxxx provides x much xxxxxxxx foundation xxxxxx justice xxxx egoism xxxx rendering xxx a xxxxxx figure xx modern xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx ReferencesAmdur x Rawls xxxxxx of xxxxxxx Domestic xxx international xxxxxxxxxxxx World xxxxxxxx https xxx jstor xxx stable xxx Radio xxxxx The xxxx of xxxxxxxxx Video xxxxxxx Matthews x Hendricks x Introduction xx philosophy xxxxxx Rebus xxxxxxxxx https xxxx umn xxx opentextbooks xxxxxxxxx introduction-to-philosophy-ethicsRussell x On xxx relation xxxxxxx psychological xxx ethical xxxxxx Philosophical xxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxxxx Journal xxx Philosophy xx the xxxxxxxx Tradition xxxx www xxxxx org xxxxxxPaying someone to do your philosophy assignment has become a practical solution for students managing tight deadlines, academic pressure, and personal responsibilities. Today’s education system demands accuracy, originality, and timely submission, which can be difficult when multiple assignments overlap. Professional academic assistance helps students meet these expectations without unnecessary stress.
When you choose to pay someone to complete your philosophy assignment, you gain access to experienced academic writers who understand university guidelines, grading criteria, and plagiarism standards. These experts deliver well-structured, properly researched, and original work that aligns with your academic requirements. Whether the assignment involves analysis, problem-solving, or concept explanation, professional help ensures clarity and relevance.
Time management is another major advantage. Assignments often require extensive research and formatting, consuming hours or even days. By outsourcing your philosophy assignment, you can focus on exams, projects, or other priorities while ensuring your work is completed on time. Quality and confidentiality also matter. Reputable academic support platforms keep your personal information secure and provide plagiarism-free content written from scratch. Many services offer revisions, allowing improvements based on instructor feedback.
Seeking help with your philosophy assignment does not mean avoiding learning. Instead, it provides a useful reference to better understand concepts, improve writing skills, and maintain consistent academic performance. Paying someone to do your philosophy assignment can be a smart and efficient academic choice.
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
