Question.486 - Chapter 4 Exercises - Logic and Critical Thinking
Answer Below:
Chapter xxxxxxxxx Exercise xxxxx Argument xxxxxxx - xxxxx tollens xxxxx Argument xxxxxxx - xxxxx Ponens xxxxx Argument xxxxxxx - xxxxxxxxxxx syllogism xxxxxxx Argument xxxxxxx - xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx Valid xxxxxxxx pattern x Affirming xxx consequent xxxxx Argument xxxxxxx - xxxxx tollens xxxxxxxx God xx in xxx heaven xx all xx right xxxx the xxxxx All xx not xxxxx with xxx world xx God xx not xx his xxxxxx Lino xx telling xxx truth xx he xxxx admit xx all xxxxxxx He xxxx not xxxxx to xxx charges xx he xx not xxxxxxx the xxxxx Some xxxx are xxxx So xxxxxxxx is xxxxx Pacifism xx not xxxxx So xxxx wars xxx not xxxx The xxx vaccine xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxx So xxx researchers xxx developed xxx vaccine xxxxxx get xxx Nobel xxxxx The xxx researchers xxx developed xxx vaccine xxxxxx not xxx the xxxxx prize xx new xxxxxxx does xxx prevents xxx spread xx virus xxxxxxxx Conclusion xxxxx that xxxxxxx God xxxxxx be xxx enforcer xx moral xxx is xxx reasonable xxxxxxx In xxx first xxxxx as xx empirical xxxxxxxxxx about xxx psychology xx human xxxxxx it xx questionable xxxxxxx - xxxxx is xx unambiguous xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx are xxxx moral xxxx non-theists xxxxxxx - xxx only xxxx psychological xxxxxxx failed xx find x significant xxxxxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx worship xxx moral xxxxxxx but xxxxxxxxx criminals xxx much xxxx likely xx be xxxxxxx than xxxxxxxx Premise x Second xxx threat xx divine xxxxxxxxxx cannot xxxxxx a xxxxx obligation xxx night xxxx not xxxx right xxxxxxxxxx - xx has x right xx speak xxx against xxxxxxxxx Bush xxxxxxx - xxx wondering xx all xxx illegal xxxxx that xxxx Gillespie xxxx to xxxx are xxxxxxx getting xx him xxxxxxx - xxx millionaire xxxxxxxxx who xxxxxx out xxx Vietnam xxx in xxx Texas xxx National xxxxx Premise x That xxxx of xx hominem xxxxxx is xxx only xxxxxxxxxxxxx to x man xxx is xxxxx a xxxxxx good xxx as xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx ratings xx more xxxx percent xxxxxxx - xx reminds xx of xxx garbage xxxxxxxx that x might xxx if x were xxxxxxx Ted xxxx or xxxxx Sontag xx one xx the xxxxx hate-mongering xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx leftist xxxxxxx It xxxxxxxx from xxx whole xxxxx of xxx article xxxxxxxxxx - xxx position xx certainly xxxxxxxxx Premise x The xxxxx thing xxxx must xxxxx t xxxxxx studying xxxxx subjectivism xxx View xxxx the xxxxxxxxx r xxxxxxxxx of xx action xxxxxxx on xxx beliefs x an xxxxxxxxxx r xxxxx seriously xx that xxx View xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx that xx action xxx be xxxx right xxx not xxxxx r xxxxx and xxx wrong xxx Premise x This xxxxxxxxxxx exists xxxxxxx as xx have xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Claims xxxx the xxxxx character x an xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx subjective xxxxxx and xxxxx states xxx vary xxxx person xx person xxxx when xxxxxxxx toward xxx same xxxxxx on xxx same xxxxxxxx Premise x Hence xxx and xxx same xxxxxx can xxxxxxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx different xxxxx charactersMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
