Question.2655 - Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 6, 7 Lesson Conducting Research (Purdue OWL) (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/index.html) How to Search the Library (https://library.chamberlain.edu/HowToSearch) Library Workshop Archive (https://library.chamberlain.edu/Workshops) (various videos about research and APA format) Minimum of 6 scholarly sourcesI n t r o d u c t i o n This week you continue to work on your paper that addresses a current controversial issue. This paper is to be in the form of an argument. You have selected a topic and chosen issues related to that topic; this week, you will thoroughly research both sides of the issues you have chosen. Keep in mind that your paper must define the issue, present evidence on both sides of the issue, and then argue that one side is stronger and more persuasive than the other. Your paper must address at least three relevant aspects of the issue. More specific directions for each part of the paper will be found within the specific assignment in the weekly modules; the assignment this week is to research both the pro and con sides of the issues you have chosen to address. Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course:?Top?24/07/2023, 15:16 Week 3: Course Project: Issue Reviewhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/4125368 2/6 Week Task Week 1 Topic Selection Week 3 Issue Review (both sides) Week 5 Thesis & Annotated Bibliography (both sides) Week 7 Argumentative PaperI n s t r u c t i o n s This week, you will conduct an issue review for your selected topic for your project. Present a brief report of your research on both sides of the issue. This should include the following: Citation of your sources Links to the sources where available Brief description of the content of each of the sources (50 to 80 words for each source) Your research review should address at least three (3) aspects of the issue that is the subject of your paper and must present at least one pro and one con article review on each aspect. Sources should be scholarly or of very high substantive quality. Click on the following link to view an example. The first aspect is written out completely, with APA citation and brief description of content. The next two aspects should be completely written out by you in your report, including correct APA citation and brief description of content.Example Issue ReviewIssue: Legalization of Prostitution Aspect 1: Safety Pro: Stern, S. W., (2019). Sex workers of the world unite. The American Scholar, pp. 40-54.The author presents the case, largely though the words of sex-workers themselves, for de- criminalization and for allowing sex workers to control the conditions of their work—that is, tooperate brothels themselves, choose their physicians, provide and receive benefits, and work outside brothels if they so choose - which will make them safer and less apt to be exploited. Con: Der Spiegel Staff. (2013, May). How legalizing prostitution has failed. Der SpiegelOnline. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficking-persists-despite- legality-of-prostitution-in-germany-a-902533.htmlStaff writers report that since de-criminalization of prostitution in Germany in 2003, exploitation and human trafficking remain significant problems. According to one German law enforcement officer, Germany is a "center for the sexual exploitation of young womenTop24/07/2023, 15:16 Week 3: Course Project: Issue Reviewhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/4125368 3/6 Because the topics vary widely, the nature of your research will also vary. If you are writing about gene therapy, for example, you will have to support your points with scholarly medical opinion. You may need to review researching techniques. Visit the research links provided in the Required Resources section in this activity for more information.Wr i t i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ( A PA f o r m a t )Length: 1-2 pages (not including title page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page References pageG r a d i n g This activity will be graded using the W3 Course Project Grading Rubric.O u t c o m e s CO 6: Apply principles of critical reasoning to political, educational, economic, and/or social issues.CO 7: Create a fallacy-free argument that incorporates principles of ethical decision- making.
Answer Below:
Issue xxxxxxxx Planning xxx Response xx the xxxxxx StatesAspect xxxxxxxx Security xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Burwell x M xxxxxxxx America x health xxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx preparedness xxx response xxx Washington xxxx The xxxxxx highlights xxx crucial xx is xxx the xx to xxxxxxxxxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx as x matter xx national xxxxxxxx The xxxxxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxxxx health xxxxxxxx is xx ensuring xxx citizens xxx protected xxx the xxxxxxx should xxxxxxxx by xxxxxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxx priority xxx The xxxxxxxx Foundation xxx risks xx securitizing xxxxxxxxx The xxxxx Signal xxx paper xxxxxx against xxxxxxxxx solely xxxxx presented xx threats xx national xxxxxxxx and xxxxx securitized xxx author xxxxxx that xxxxxxxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx focusing xx security xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxx pressing xxxxxx health xxxxxx may xxxx result xx oversight xxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Aspect xxxxxxx National xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx AllocationPro xxxxxxx T x A xxx approach xx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx Developing x dynamic xxxxxxxx strategy xxxxxxx of xxxxxx Health xxxxxx - xxx author xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx national xxxxxxxx preparedness xxxxxxxx that xxx adapt xx evolving xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxx stresses xxx significance xx building xx a xxxxxx dedicated xx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx adequate xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx potential xxxxxx emergencies xxx Davis x W xxx challenges xx budgeting xxx pandemics x critical xxxxxxxx Public xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Review x The xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxx in xxxx study xxx it xx strongly xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx may xx better xxxx to xxxxxxxx budgets xxx author xxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx resource xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx federal xxxxxxxx and xxxxx governments xxx necessary xxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx reaction xxxxxx Clarifying xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx PreparednessPro xxxxx J x amp xxx K xxxxxxxxxx as xx asset xxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx United xxxxxx Health xxxxxx - xxx article xxxxx the xxxx for x unique xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx among xxx various xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxxxxx preparedness xxx importance xx federalism xx a xxxxx that xxxxxxx states xx tailor xxxxxxxxx to xxxxx their xxxxx while xxxxxxxxxxxx projects xx the xxxxxxx level xx emphasized xxx Public xxxxxx Watchdog xxxxx Federalism xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx preparedness xxxxxxx from xxxxxx Health xxxxxxx Blog xxx Public xxxxxx Watchdog xxxxx expresses xxxxxxx about xxx capacity xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx crises xxx paper xxxxxxxxx several xxxxxxxxx of xxx COVID- xxxxxxxx in xxxxx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx federal xxx national xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx strategies xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx responseMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
