Question.1615 - R e q u i r e d R e s o u r c e sRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 8, 9, 17 (Introduction); review Chapter 7LessonI n t r o d u c t i o nRemember – your actual journal entry should be somewhat brief; most of your time should bespent thinking about the questions asked and the issues raised. Your thoughts should then bedistilled into a mini-argument that will respond affirmatively to the four tests for evaluatingarguments: truthfulness of premises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity.I n s t r u c t i o n sFor this journal assignment, briefly answer each of the following prompts:Inference: The differing meanings of "valid inference" and "warranted inference" areclosely related to the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments – thepurpose of deductive being to prove; the purpose of inductive to make the conclusionmost probable.Look up the words "valid" and "warranted." Each of these words, you will find, haswhat is known as a lexical definition – that is just the dictionary definition of theword. Words also have a certain connotations - meanings that go beyond their??04/08/2023, 09:27Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253772/5lexical definitions; associated ideas and concepts – think of terms such a "fur baby"as the name for a pet.Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and"warranted" can help us understand the differing purposes of deductive andinductive arguments.Fallacies: In Section 8.2, the text states that there are "fallacious argument templates"(Facione & Gittens, p. 167) and then gives a number of examples. The authors furtherstate: "Analysis of the meanings of the terms used and the grammatical rules of thelanguage reveal the source of error" (p.167).Choose one of the fallacies in this section, such as Denying the Antecedent or FalseClassification and pair it with the valid argument template. For example, if youchoose Denying the Antecedent, the valid argument template will be Denying theConsequent. False Classification would pair with one of the fallacies in ReasoningAbout Classes of Objects.Explain, in your own words, how the fallacy is revealed through analysis of the validargument template. Think of it this way – if you know how the heart works, you willknow that certain malfunctions will prevent it from working. For example, if youknow that the coronary arteries supply the heart with blood, then you can reasonthat a blockage will stop that vital flow. So this journal prompt asks you to explain, inyour own words, how one of the valid argument templates work – and how thatexposes the fallacy connected with that type of argument.Civic Responsibility: At the end of Chapter 9 there is a Bonus Exercise that asks you toresearch and analyze the 2009 debate over the healthcare public option. If you wereactually to complete that exercise, it would take quite a bit of time and effort.Do you think that completing such an exercise would be time well spent or timewasted? If well-spent, why? If time wasted, why?Is there any issue on which you think a comparable amount of time and effort wouldbe worthwhile?As a critical thinker, do you believe that citizens have an obligation to be informedon topics of current interest? If yes, why, if no, why not?If you include references to outside sources (beyond the textbook), make sure you cite themproperly.Wr i t i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ( A PA f o r m a t )Length: 1 ½ -2 pages (not including prompts, title page or references page)1-inch marginsDouble spaced12-point Times New Roman font04/08/2023, 09:27Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253773/5Journal Grading Rubric - 35 ptsTitle pageReferences page (as needed)G r a d i n gThis activity will be graded using the Journal Grading Rubric.O u t c o m e sCO 3: Analyze deductive and inductive reasoning structures.CO 4: Evaluate arguments by applying tests of truthfulness, logical strength, relevance, andnon-circularity.CO 5: Evaluate the role of cognitive bias and fallacies of relevance in critical reasoning anddecision-making.CO 6: Apply principles of critical reasoning to political, educational, economic, and/or socialissues.D u e D a t eBy 11:59 p.m. MT on SundayR e f e r e n c e sFacione, P. A., & Gittens, C. A. (2016). Think critically (3rd ed.). Pearson.04/08/2023, 09:27Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253774/5CriteriaRatingsPts5 pts15 pts10 ptsLength5 ptsMeets length requirement0 ptsDoes not meet length requirementContentReflection15 ptsReflectiondemonstrates ahigh degree ofcritical thinkingin applying,analyzing, andevaluating keycourseconcepts andtheories fromreadings,lectures,media,discussionsactivities,and/orassignments.Insightful andrelevantconnectionsmade throughcontextualexplanations,inferences, andexamples.12.75 ptsReflectiondemonstratessome degreeof criticalthinking inapplying,analyzing,and/orevaluating keycourseconcepts andtheories fromreadings,lectures,media,discussionsactivities,and/orassignments.Connectionsmade throughexplanations,inferences,and/orexamples.11.25 ptsReflectiondemonstrateslimited criticalthinking inapplying,analyzing,and/orevaluating keycourseconcepts andtheories fromreadings,lectures,media,discussions,activities,and/orassignments.Minimalconnectionsmade throughexplanations,inferences,and/orexamples.9 ptsReflectionlacks criticalthinking.Superficialconnectionsare made withkey courseconcepts andcoursematerials,activities,and/orassignments.0 ptsLittle ornoreflection;copies orrepeatstext orlecture.PersonalGrowth10 ptsConveysstrongevidence ofreflection onown work witha personalresponse tothe selfassessmentquestionsposed.Demonstratessignificantpersonalgrowth andawareness ofdeepermeaning8.5ptsConveysevidence ofreflection onown work witha personalresponse tothe selfassessmentquestionsposed.Demonstratessatisfactorypersonalgrowth andawarenessthrough someinferencesmade,7.5ptsConveyslimitedevidence ofreflection onown work inresponse tothe selfassessmentquestionsposed.Demonstratesless thanadequatepersonalgrowth andawarenessthrough few orsimplistic6 ptsConveysinadequateevidence ofreflection onown work inresponse tothe selfassessmentquestionsposed.Personalgrowth andawareness arenot evidentand/ordemonstratesa neutralexperience0 ptsNoevidenceofreflection.04/08/2023, 09:27Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253775/5Total Points: 35CriteriaRatingsPts5 ptsthroughinferencesmade,examples, welldevelopedinsights, andsubstantialdepth inperceptionsandchallenges.Synthesizescurrentexperience intofutureimplications.examples,insights, andchallenges.Some thoughtof the futureimplications ofcurrentexperience.inferencesmade,examples,insights,and/orchallenges thatare not welldeveloped.Minimalthought of thefutureimplications ofcurrentexperience.with negligiblepersonalimpact. Lacksenoughinferences,examples,personalinsights andchallenges,and/or futureimplicationsareoverlooked.WritingQuality5 ptsWell writtenandclearlyorganizedusingstandardEnglish,characterizedby elements ofa strongwriting styleand basicallyfree fromgrammar,punctuation,usage, andspellingerrors.4.25 ptsAboveaveragewriting styleand logicallyorganizedusingstandardEnglish withminor errorsin grammar,punctuation,usage, andspelling.3.75 ptsAverageand/orcasualwritingstylethat issometimesunclearand/or withsome errorsin grammar,punctuation,usage, andspelling.3 ptsPoor writingstylelackingin standardEnglish,clarity,languageused, and/orfrequenterrors ingrammar,punctuation,usage, andspelling.Needs work.0 ptsLackscoherence;errors ingrammar,usage andspellinginterfere withreadability andunderstandingto significantdegree.
Answer Below:
INFERENCE xxxxxxxxxx ideas xxx conceptsWhen xxx tires xx the xxxxxxx had xxxxx in xxxx Ben xxxxxxx new xxxxx for xxx bicycle xxx bought x pair xx new xxxxx for xxx cycle xxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx after xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx many xxxxx and xxxxxxx to xxxx the xxxxxxx tires xxx his xxxxx now xxx had xxxx satisfied xxxx fulfilling xxx requirements xxxxxx et xx The xxxxxxxxx value xxxxxxxxxx defines xxx value xxxxxxx in xxx as xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx demands xx requirements xxxxxx by xxx people xxxx remarkably xxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxx the xxxxx choice xxxxxx a xxxx condition xxxxxx and xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx Valid xxxxxxx acceptable xxxxxxx some xxxxxxxxxx or xxxx whereas xxxxxxxxx implies xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx yourdictionary xxx The xxxxxxx definitions xxx connotations xx valid xxx be xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx arguments xx it xxxxx accepting xx justifying xxxxxxxxx based xx principles xxx laws xxxxxxxxx arguments xxxxxx to xxxx probability xxx if xxx argument xx valid xxx reasoning xxxx be xxxx This xx the xxxxxx why xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx with xxx inductive xxxxxxxx degruyter xxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx definitions xx warrant xxx be xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx argument xx it xxxxx a xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Deductive xxxxxxxxx intend xx give xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxx and xx the xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx will xx true xxxx is xxx reason xxx warranted xxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx with x deductive xxxxxxxx iep xxx edu xxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxx Here xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx fallacy xxx been xxxxxx and xx is xxxxxx with xxx valid xxxxxxxx template xx denying xxx Consequent xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx is x logical xxxxxxx here x conditional xxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx if xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx Consequent xx the xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx then xxx Consequent xxxx also xx rejected xxxx fallacy xxxx in xxx supposition xxxx a xxxxxxxxx being xxxxx spontaneously xxxxx the xxxxxxx wrong xxxxx is xxx always xxxx One xxxxxxx of xxx antecedent xx If xx is xxxxxxxxx then xxx flow xx damp xx it xx not xxxxxxxxx the xxxx is xxx damp xxx example xx a xxxxxxx because xxxxx can xx oh xxx reasons xxx damping xxx floor xxxxxxx edu xxxxxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx functions xxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx in xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx of xxx situation xxxxxxx logically xxxx to xxx refusal xx the xxxxxxx as xxx outcome xxx be xxxxxx by xxxxx situations xxx this xx the xxxxxxxxx when xxxxxxxxx lie xxxxx RESPONSIBILITY xxxxxx If xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx policies xx healthcare xx history xxxx such xx exercise xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx time xx will xxxx a xxxxxx knowledge xxx understanding xx the xxxxxx But xx anyone xx not xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx topics xx these xxx not xxxxxxx to xxxxx studies xx career xxxx it xxxxx be x waste xx time xxxxxx Some xxxx issues xx problems xxxxx require x sufficient xxxxxx of xxxxxx and xxxx The xxxxx depends xx choice xxxxxxxx career xxxxx or xxxxxxxx focus xxxx examples xxxxxxxx are-The xxxx of xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx advancement xx the xxxxxxxxx systemThe xxxxxx of xxxxxx media xx the xxxxxxxx on xxx mental xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx Moubayed xxxx et xx The xxxxxxxxxx of xxx climate xxx its xxxxxx on xxx worldwide xxxxxxx Prompt xx a xxxxxxxx thinker xx is xxxxxx important xx be xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxx content xx current xxxxxxxx because xx permits x person xx appeal xx knowledgeable xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx serving x more xxxxxxxxx society xx also xxxxxxx a xxxxxx to xxxx their xxxxx of xxxx based xx evidence xxx facts xx also xxxxx a xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx to xxxx decisions xxxxxxx to xxxxx daily xxxx choices xxxxxx and xxxxxx psyche xx nbsp xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx N xxxxxx A xxxxxx E xxxxxxxxx L xxxxxxxxx R xxx Bonatti x L xxxxx Precursors xx logical xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx human xxxxxxx Science xx - xxxxxxx aao xxxx degruyter xxx Models xx Lexical xxxxxxx https xxx degruyter xxx document xxx - xxxx text xx this xxxxxxx C xx discuss x symbolic x conceptual xxx distributional xxx utm xxx Deductive xxx inductive xxxxxxxxx https xxx utm xxx deductive-inductive-arguments xxxx Deductive xxxxxxxxx are xxx always xxx conclusion xxxx be xxxxxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxx M xxxxx A xxx Lutfiyya x Student xxxxxxxxxx level xx an xxxxxxxxxx environment xxxxxxxxxx using xxxxxxx nbsp xxxxxxxx Journal xx Distance xxxxxxxxx nbsp xx - xxxx https xxx tandfonline xxx doi xxx palomar xxx fallacy xxxxx www xxxxxxx edu xxxxx bthompson xxxx is x Fallacy xxxx text xxxx argument xx clearly xxxxx valid xxxxxxxxx can xx fallacious xxxxxx co xxxxx responsibility xxxxx psyche xx ideas xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx com xxxxx https xxx yourdictionary xxx valid xxxx nbsp xxxxMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
