Question.1848 - R e q u i r e d R e s o u r c e sRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 6, 7LessonConducting Research (Purdue OWL)(https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/index.html)How to Search the Library(https://library.chamberlain.edu/HowToSearch)Library Workshop Archive(https://library.chamberlain.edu/Workshops) (various videosabout research and APA format)Minimum of 6 scholarly sourcesI n t r o d u c t i o nThis week you continue to work on your paper that addresses a current controversial issue.This paper is to be in the form of an argument. You have selected a topic and chosen issuesrelated to that topic; this week, you will thoroughly research both sides of the issues you havechosen. Keep in mind that your paper must define the issue, present evidence on both sides ofthe issue, and then argue that one side is stronger and more persuasive than the other. Yourpaper must address at least three relevant aspects of the issue. More specific directions foreach part of the paper will be found within the specific assignment in the weekly modules; theassignment this week is to research both the pro and con sides of the issues you have chosento address.Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course:?Top?24/07/2023, 15:16Week 3: Course Project: Issue Reviewhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253682/6WeekTaskWeek 1Topic SelectionWeek 3Issue Review (both sides)Week 5Thesis & Annotated Bibliography (both sides)Week 7Argumentative PaperI n s t r u c t i o n sThis week, you will conduct an issue review for your selected topic for your project. Present abrief report of your research on both sides of the issue. This should include the following:Citation of your sourcesLinks to the sources where availableBrief description of the content of each of the sources (50 to 80 words for each source)Your research review should address at least three (3) aspects of the issue that is the subjectof your paper and must present at least one pro and one con article review on each aspect.Sources should be scholarly or of very high substantive quality.Click on the following link to view an example. The first aspect is written out completely, withAPA citation and brief description of content. The next two aspects should be completely writtenout by you in your report, including correct APA citation and brief description of content.Example Issue ReviewIssue: Legalization of ProstitutionAspect 1: SafetyPro: Stern, S. W., (2019). Sex workers of the world unite. The American Scholar, pp. 40-54.The author presents the case, largely though the words of sex-workers themselves, for decriminalization and for allowing sex workers to control the conditions of their work—that is, tooperate brothels themselves, choose their physicians, provide and receive benefits, andwork outside brothels if they so choose - which will make them safer and less apt to beexploited.Con: Der Spiegel Staff. (2013, May). How legalizing prostitution has failed. Der SpiegelOnline. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficking-persists-despitelegality-of-prostitution-in-germany-a-902533.htmlStaff writers report that since de-criminalization of prostitution in Germany in 2003,exploitation and human trafficking remain significant problems. According to one Germanlaw enforcement officer, Germany is a "center for the sexual exploitation of young womenTop24/07/2023, 15:16Week 3: Course Project: Issue Reviewhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253683/6Because the topics vary widely, the nature of your research will also vary. If you are writingabout gene therapy, for example, you will have to support your points with scholarly medicalopinion. You may need to review researching techniques. Visit the research links provided inthe Required Resources section in this activity for more information.Wr i t i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ( A PA f o r m a t )Length: 1-2 pages (not including title page)1-inch marginsDouble spaced12-point Times New Roman fontTitle pageReferences pageG r a d i n gThis activity will be graded using the W3 Course Project Grading Rubric.O u t c o m e sCO 6: Apply principles of critical reasoning to political, educational, economic, and/orsocial issues.CO 7: Create a fallacy-free argument that incorporates principles of ethical decisionmaking.D u e D a t efrom Eastern Europe, as well as a sphere of activity for organized crime groups from aroundthe world" (Germany's Human Trafficking Problem section)Aspect 2: SESTA/FOSTAPro: (APA citation to article supporting SESTA legislation; brief description of content)Con: (APA citation to article against SESTA legislation; brief description of content)Aspect 3: EconomicsPro: (APA citation to article showing better income/standard of living after de-criminalization;brief description of content)Con: (APA citation to article showing real economic benefit is to pimps, traffickers brief;description of content)Top24/07/2023, 15:16Week 3: Course Project: Issue Reviewhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/41253684/6W3 Course Project Grading Rubric - 75
Answer Below:
Issue xxxxxxxx Planning xxx Response xx the xxxxxx StatesAspect xxxxxxxx Security xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Burwell x M xxxxxxxx America's xxxxxx security x strategy xxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx Post xxx author xxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx it xx for xxx US xx prioritize xxxxxxxx preparedness xx a xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx security xxx COVID- xxxxxxxx demonstrated xxx important xxxxxx security xx to xxxxxxxx all xxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxx and xxx country xxxxxx regulate xx giving xxxxxxxx preparedness x high xxxxxxxx Con xxx Heritage xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx pandemics xxx Daily xxxxxx The xxxxx argues xxxxxxx pandemics xxxxxx being xxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx security xxx being xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx argues xxxx although xxxxxxxx preparedness xx essential xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx at xxx expense xx other xxxxxxxx public xxxxxx issues xxx also xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx and x misallocation xx resources xxxxxx Dynamic xxxxxxxx Strategy xxx Budget xxxxxxxxxxxxx Johnson x R x new xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx preparedness xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx national xxxxxxxx Journal xx Public xxxxxx Policy x The xxxxxx proposes x flexible xxxxxxxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx strategy xxxx may xxxxx to xxxxxxxx threats xxx document xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx up x budget xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx preparation xxx response xx ensure xxxxxxxx resources xxx available xx manage xxxxxxxxx health xxxxxxxxxxx Con xxxxx R x The xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxx analysis xxxxxx Administration xxxxxx - xxx challenges xx budgeting xxx pandemics xxx examined xx this xxxxx and xx is xxxxxxxx suggested xxxx there xxx be xxxxxx ways xx allocate xxxxxxx The xxxxxx argues xxxx increased xxxxxxxx flexibility xxx collaboration xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx national xxx local xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx preparedness xx guarantee x radical xxxxxxxx Aspect xxxxxxxxxx Responsibilities xxx Pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx nbsp xxxxx J x amp xxx K xxxxxxxxxx as xx asset xxx pandemic xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx United xxxxxx Health xxxxxx - xxx article xxxxx the xxxx for x unique xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx among xxx various xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxxxxx preparedness xxx importance xx federalism xx a xxxxx that xxxxxxx states xx tailor xxxxxxxxx to xxxxx their xxxxx while xxxxxxxxxxxx projects xx the xxxxxxx level xx emphasized xxx Public xxxxxx Watchdog xxxxx Federalism xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx preparedness xxxxxxx from xxxxxx Health xxxxxxx Blog xxx Public xxxxxx Watchdog xxxxx expresses xxxxxxx about xxx capacity xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx crises xxx paper xxxxxxxxx several xxxxxxxxx of xxx COVID- xxxxxxxx in xxxxx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx federal xxx national xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx strategies xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx response xxxx nbspMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
