Question.2340 - Remember – your actual journal entry should be somewhat brief; most of your time should be spent thinking about the questions asked and the issues raised. Your thoughts should then be distilled into a mini-argument that will respond affirmatively to the four tests for evaluating arguments: truthfulness of premises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity.I n s t r u c t i o n s For this journal assignment, briefly answer each of the following prompts: Inference: The differing meanings of "valid inference" and "warranted inference" are closely related to the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments – the purpose of deductive being to prove; the purpose of inductive to make the conclusion most probable. Look up the words "valid" and "warranted." Each of these words, you will find, has what is known as a lexical definition – that is just the dictionary definition of the word. Words also have a certain connotations - meanings that go beyond their??04/08/2023, 09:27 Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/4125377 2/5 lexical definitions; associated ideas and concepts – think of terms such a "fur baby" as the name for a pet. Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us understand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments. Fallacies: In Section 8.2, the text states that there are "fallacious argument templates" (Facione & Gittens, p. 167) and then gives a number of examples. The authors further state: "Analysis of the meanings of the terms used and the grammatical rules of the language reveal the source of error" (p.167). Choose one of the fallacies in this section, such as Denying the Antecedent or False Classification and pair it with the valid argument template. For example, if you choose Denying the Antecedent, the valid argument template will be Denying the Consequent. False Classification would pair with one of the fallacies in Reasoning About Classes of Objects. Explain, in your own words, how the fallacy is revealed through analysis of the valid argument template. Think of it this way – if you know how the heart works, you will know that certain malfunctions will prevent it from working. For example, if you know that the coronary arteries supply the heart with blood, then you can reason that a blockage will stop that vital flow. So this journal prompt asks you to explain, in your own words, how one of the valid argument templates work – and how that exposes the fallacy connected with that type of argument. Civic Responsibility: At the end of Chapter 9 there is a Bonus Exercise that asks you to research and analyze the 2009 debate over the healthcare public option. If you were actually to complete that exercise, it would take quite a bit of time and effort. Do you think that completing such an exercise would be time well spent or time wasted? If well-spent, why? If time wasted, why? Is there any issue on which you think a comparable amount of time and effort would be worthwhile? As a critical thinker, do you believe that citizens have an obligation to be informed on topics of current interest? If yes, why, if no, why not?If you include references to outside sources (beyond the textbook), make sure you cite them properly.Wr i t i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ( A PA f o r m a t )Length: 1 1⁄2 -2 pages (not including prompts, title page or references page) 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font04/08/2023, 09:27 Week 4: Journalhttps://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/127112/assignments/4125377 3/5 Journal Grading Rubric - 35 pts Title page References page (as needed)
Answer Below:
INFERENCE xxxxxxxxxx ideas xxx concepts xxxx the xxxxx of xxx bicycle xxx holes xx them xxx desired xxx tires xxx his xxxxxxx Ben xxxxxx a xxxx of xxx tires xxx his xxxxx from x supermarket xxxxx searching xxx considering xxxx shops xxx options xx find xxx correct xxxxx for xxx cycle xxx Ben xxx been xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxx his xxxxxxxxxxxx Cesana xx al xxx practical xxxxx moderately xxxxxxx the xxxxx present xx Ben xx when xxx comprehensive xxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx sought xx the xxxxxx were xxxxxxxxxx fulfilled xx invading xxx right xxxxxx making x poor xxxxxxxxx calmer xxx easier xx understand xxxxx implies xxxxxxxxxx through xxxx principles xx laws xxxxxxx warranted xxxxxxx assurance xx guarantee xx something xxxxxxxxxxxxxx com xxx lexical xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx can xx applied xx inductive xxxxxxxxx as xx means xxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx something xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx Inductive xxxxxxxxx intend xx give xxxxxxxxxxx and xx the xxxxxxxx is xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx will xx true xxxx is xxx reason xxx validity xx associated xxxx the xxxxxxxxx argument xxxxxxxxx com xxx connotations xxx lexical xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx can xx applied xx deductive xxxxxxxx as xx gives x guarantee xx surety xx something xxxxxxxxx arguments xxxxxx to xxxx assurance xx certainty xxx if xxx arguments xxx warranted xxx reasoning xxxx be xxxx This xx the xxxxxx why xxxxxxxxx assurance xx associated xxxx a xxxxxxxxx argument xxx utm xxx FALLACIES xxxx denying xxx Antecedent xxxxxxx had xxxx chosen xxx it xx paired xxxx the xxxxx argument xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx Denying xxx Antecedent xx a xxxxxxx fallacy xxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx statement xx approved xxx example xx antecedent xxx then xxxxxxxxxx If xxx antecedent xx rejected xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx will xxxx be xxxxxxxx This xxxxxxx lies xx the xxxxxxxxxxx that x situation xxxxx wrong xxxxxxxxxxxxx makes xxx outcome xxxxx which xx not xxxxxx true xxx example xx the xxxxxxxxxx is xx it xx showering xxxx the xxxx is xxxx If xx is xxx showering xxx flow xx not xxxx The xxxxxxx is x fallacy xxxxxxx there xxx be xx her xxxxxxx for xxxxxxx the xxxxx palomar xxx Understanding xxx denying xxx Antecedent xxxxxxxxx helps xx understand xxx fallacy xx denying xxx Consequent xxx refusal xx the xxxxxxxxx doesn x logically xxxx to xxx refusal xx the xxxxxxx as xxx outcome xxx be xxxxxx by xxxxx situations xxx this xx the xxxxxxxxx when xxxxxxxxx lie xxxxx RESPONSIBILITY xxxxxx If xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx policies xx healthcare xx history xxxx such xx exercise xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx time xx will xxxx a xxxxxx knowledge xxx understanding xx the xxxxxx But xx anyone xx not xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx topics xx these xxx not xxxxxxx to xxxxx studies xx career xxxx it xxxxx be x waste xx time xxxxxx Some xxxx issues xx problems xxxxx require x sufficient xxxxxx of xxxxxx and xxxx The xxxxx depends xx choice xxxxxxxx career xxxxx or xxxxxxxx focus xxxx examples xxxxxxxx are- xxx role xx function xx technological xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx education xxxxxx The xxxxxx of xxxxxx media xx the xxxxxxxx on xxx mental xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx Moubayed xx al xxx alteration xx the xxxxxxx and xxx effect xx the xxxxxxxxx economy xxxxxx As x critical xxxxxxx it xx surely xxxxxxxxx to xx informed xx knowledgeable xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxx interest xxxxxxx it xxxxxxx a xxxxxx to xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxx debates xxx discussions xxxxxxx a xxxx developed xxxxxxx It xxxx permits x person xx make xxxxx point xx view xxxxx on xxxxxxxx and xxxxx It xxxx gives x person xxx potential xx make xxxxxxxxx related xx their xxxxx life xxxxxxx career xxx voting xxxxxx co xxxxxxxxx Cesana-Arlotti x Martin x Teglas x Vorobyova x Cetnarski x and xxxxxxx L x March xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx reasoning xx preverbal xxxxx infants xxxxxxx pp x science xxx degruyter xxx Models xx Lexical xxxxxxx https xxx degruyter xxx document xxx - xxxx text xx this xxxxxxx C xx discuss x symbolic x con xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxx iep xxx edu xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx arguments xxxxx iep xxx edu xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx arguments xxxx Deductive xxxxxxxxx are xxx always xxx conclusion xxxx be xxxx Moubayed x Injadat x Shami x and xxxxxxxx H xxxxxxx engagement xxxxx in xx e- xxxxxxxx environment xxxxxxxxxx using xxxxxxx American xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Education xx - xxxxx www xxxxxxxxxxx com xxx abs xxxxxxx edu xxxxxxx https xxx palomar xxx users xxxxxxxxx What xx a xxxxxxx html xxxx This xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxx valid xxxxx arguments xxx be xxxxxxxxxx psyche xx Moral xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https xxxxxx co xxxxx on-the-moral-responsibility-to- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx yourdictionary xxx valid xxxxx www xxxxxxxxxxxxxx com xxxxxMore Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
