Question.5023 - First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.
Answer Below:
Week xxxxxx Project xxxxxxxxx - xxxxx Selection xxx Discussion xxxx TobarChamberlain xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jennifer xxxxxxxxxxxxx Ethical xxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxx A xxxxx AnalysisThe xxx of xxxxxxxxxx which xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx ending xx someone's xxxx so xxxx he xx she xxxx not xxxxxx stands xx an xxxxxxx issue xx a xxx of xxxxxxxx This xxxxx thus xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx debate xxxxxxx ethical xxxxxx and xxxxxx contract xxxxxx concerning xxx professional xxxxx of xxxxxx and xxx possible xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx codes xxxx personal xxxxxx obligations xxx Ethical xxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx proponents xxxx two xxxx moral xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx Autonomy xxxxxxxxxxx must xxxx the xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx what xxxxxxx in xxxxx own xxxxx including xxxxxxx an xxx to xxxxxxxxxx suffering xxxxx Euthanasia xxx be xxxx as x compassionate xxxxxxxx toward xxxxx persons xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx pain xxx this xxx has x strong xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sanctity xx Life xxxxx life xxx an xxxxxxxxx dignity xxx no xxx should xxx a xxxxx against xx Slippery xxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx could xxxxxxxxxxx endanger xxxxxxxxxx populations xxxxxxx Egoist xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx egoism xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx should xxx in x manner xxxxx on xxxxx self-interests xxxxxxxxxxx euthanasia xxxxx then xx one xx the xxxxxxx permissible xxxxxx to xx if xx seems xx be xxxxxxx with xxx self-interest xx those xxxxxxxx It xx reasonable xxxx the xxxxxxxxx side xx consider xxxxxxxxxx for xx ends xxx present xxxxxxxxx Ethical xxxxxx accepts xxxxxx made xx Rachels xxx Rachels xxx write xxxx an xxxxxxxxxx might xxxxxx interest xxxx societal xxxxx If xx is xxxxxxx personal xxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx standing x physician xxx decline xx participate xx any xx the xxxxx activities xxxxx exists xx acute xxxxxxx between xxxxxxx to xxxxx own xxxx and xxx obligations xxxx ought xx be xxxxxxxx towards xxxxx people xxx right xxxxxx according xx ethical xxxxxx would xx to xxxxxx the xxxx balance xxxxxxx individual xxxxxxx of xxxxxx and xxxxxxx safeguards xxxxxxx coercion xx abusive xxxxxx ensuring xxxx everyone xxxxxxx true xx their xxx self-interest xxx without xxxx to xxxxxx Social xxxxxxxx Ethicist xxxxxxxxxxxxxx principles xx the xxxxxx contract xxxxxx involve xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx society xx promote xxxxxxxxxx good xxx stability xxxx the xxxxxx contract xxxxxxxx would xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxx trust xxx collective xxxxxxx Considering xxxx euthanasia xxxxxxxxx through xxxxxxxxxx processes xxx strict xxxxxxxxxx would xxxxxxx individual xxxxxx while xxxxxxxx accountability xx may xxxxxx pass xxx social xxxxxxxx test xx the xxxxxxxx if xx is xxxxxxxxxxx trust xx healthcare xxxxxxx it xxx go xxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxx social xxxxxxxx which xxxx at xxxxxxxx stability xxxxx two xxxxxxxxx would xxxxxxxxxx each xxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx obligations xxx example x doctor xxxxxxxxxx in xx illegal xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx has xx face x moral xxxxxxx when xxx family xxxxxxx assistance xx putting xx end xx their xxxxxxxxx relative xxx best xxxxxxxx under xxxxxx contract xxxxxx is xxx clarity xx legal xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx individual xxxxxxxx on xxx one xxxx with xxxxxxxx protection xxxxxxx abuse xx the xxxxx Professional xxxxx of xxxxxx and xxxxxxxx ConflictsEuthanasia xxx be xxxxxxxxxx primarily xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx ethics xxxxx might xxxxxxx to xx significantly xxxx is xxx ethical xxxxxxx that xxx American xxxxxxx Association xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx regarding xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx suicide xxxxxxx they xxxxxxxxxxxxx refute xx by xxxxxxx intentionally xxxxxx life xx fundamentally xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxx physician's xxxx as xxxxxx This xxxxxx an xxxxxxx dimension xxxx families xxxxxxx doctor-assisted xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxx terminally xxx patients x physician xxxxxxxxx American xxxxxxx Association xxx guidelines xxx refuse xxxxxxxxxx to x patient xxx ultimately xxxxxxxxx it xxx received xxxxxx support xxxx possibly xxxxxxxxxxx trust xxxxxx healthcare xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx According xx van xxx Geest xxx Satalkar xxxxx conflicts xxxxxxxxx a xxxx for xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx the xxx professional xxx family xxxxxxxxxxxx They xxxxx The xxxxxxx dimension xx euthanasia xxxxxxx balancing xxx right xx autonomy xxx dignity xxxx the xxxxx obligation xx protecting xxxx p xxx such xxxxxxxx remedy xxxxxxxx amendments xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx codes xx that xxxx would xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx under xxxxxx conditions xxxxx at xxx same xxxx expanding xxxxxxxxxx care xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx for xxxxx otherwise xxxxxxx ConclusionConsiderations xx individual xxxxxx versus xxxxxx stability xxxxxx professional xxxxxx are xxx weighed xxxxxxx by xxx ethical xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx introduces xxxxxxx egoism xxxxxxxxx euthanasia xx be xxxxx in xxxxxxxxx where xx serves xxxxx self-interest xxxxxxxx that xxxxxx can xxxxxxxx based xx their xxx beliefs xxxxxx contract xxxxxx on xxx other xxxx puts xxxxxxxxxx processes xxx societal xxxxxxxxxx mechanisms xx necessary xxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxx form xx euthanasia xxxxxx While xxxxxxxxxxxx codes xx conduct xxxxxx euthanasia xxxx are xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx calls xxx compromise xxxx changing xxxxxxxx attitudes xxxxxx end-of-life xxxx Rachels xxx Rachels xxxxxx that xxxxx reasoning xxxx seek x balance xxxxxxx respect xxx autonomy xxx wider xxxxxxxx around xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx systems xx the xxx the xxxxxxx intricacies xx euthanasia xxxx be xxxxxxxxx in xxxx must xx a xxxxxxxx and xxxxx conversation xxxxx various xxxxxxxxxxxx patients xxx families xxxxxxx professionals xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx so xxxx a xxxxxx and xxxx responsible xxx to xxx may xxxxxxxx ReferencesRachels x Rachels x The xxxxxxxx of xxxxx philosophy xx ed xxxxxx Hill xxx der xxxxx S xxxxxxxx P xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxxx life xxxxxxxxxx in xxx Netherlands xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx perspective x reflexive xxxxxxxxxxx Anthropology xxxxxMore Articles From Principal of Ethics (455N)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
