Question.2530 - REFLECTION PAPER ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEW The purpose of these papers is to present your well-articulated perspective and thoughts from reviewing significant cases in Juvenile Justice. These cases highlight the major legal and ethical issues within juvenile justice in America. You have 2 reflection papers for the course so you will have to write about 2 separate cases. INSTRUCTIONS Choose a case from the list provided below OR choose a significant juvenile justice case that interest you: 1. Kent vs. United States, 1966 - Due Process in Juvenile Waiver 2. In re Gault 1967 - Due Process applied 3. Mckeiver vs. Pennsylvania, 1971 - No Right to Trial by Jury 4. Breed vs. Jones, 1975 - Double Jeopardy applies in Waiver Proceedings 5. Yarborough, Warden vs. Alvarado, 2004 - Application of Miranda Rights to Juveniles 6. Schall vs. Martin, 1984 - Allows Preventative Juvenile Detention 7. Roper vs. Simmons, 2005 - Capital Punishment 8. Sante Fe Independent School District vs. Doe, 2000 - Prayer in School 9. Tinker vs. Des Moines School District, 1969 - Free Speech at School 10. Ingraham vs. Wright, 1977 - Due Process in Corporal Punishment 11. New Jersey vs. T.L.O., 1985 - Search and Seizure at School 12. Veronia vs. Acton, 1995 - Drug Testing Address the following in your paper: ? The facts of the case ? The legal issue ? The holding ? The rationale ? The case significance ? Any ethical issues ? How would you address the case from a Christ-centered perspective (support your perspective with scripture)? Your paper must be a minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title page and reference list. Each section, from the facts to Christ centered perspective, is effective and labeled. Information flows in an organized and meaningful manner. The paper must follow current APA format and include a minimum of 3 references. There is a clear and meaningful connection between all the resources. It must be well-organized and be reflective of your thinking and struggles in these very complex areas of juvenile justice.
Answer Below:
Case xxxxxx vs xxxxxx - xxxxxx Preventative xxxxxxxx DetentionThe xxxxx of xxx caseIn xxxx case xxx defendant xxxxx Gregory xxxxxx was xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx on xxx with xxxxxxxx possessions xx weapon xxxxx degree xxxxxxx and xxxxxx degree xxxxxxx at xxx time xx incident xxxxxx was xxxx old xxxx he xxx possession xx the xxx at xxx time xx arrest xxx incident xxxxxxxx around x m xx mislead xx the xxxxxx on xxxxx he xxxxx and xxxx whom xx Dec xx he xxx presented xx the xxx York xxxxx s xxxxx under xxxxxx of xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxxxx lateness xx the xxxx possession xx loaded xxx as xxx reason xxx he xxxxxx be xxxxxxxx under xxxx b xxx court xxxxxxxx detention xxxxx New xxxx Family xxxxx Act xxx The xxxxx two xxxxxxx i x Kenneth xxxxxx and xxxxxxx were xxxx detained xxx both xxxx years xx age xxxxx NEXIS xxx legal xxxxxxxx legal xxxxxx for xxxx case xxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxx b xxxxx is xxx process xxxxxx under xxxxxxxxxxxx was xxxxx The xxxxxxxx to xxx case xxxxx was xx violation xxxx Martin xxxxx to xxxxx habeas xxxxxx action xx the xxxxxxxx court xx US xxx the xxxxxxxxx declaring xxxx b xx be xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx process xxxxx with xxxxx protection xxxxxx of xxx th xxxxxxxxx However xxx district xxxxx argued xx reject xxx equal xxxxxxxxxx to xx weak xxx said xxxx due xxxxxxx clauses xxxx considered xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx to xxxxxxx all xxx class xxxxxxx who xxxx detained xxxxx the xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx final xxxxxxx of xxx case xxx that x is xxx considered xx be xxxxxxx in xxx due xxxxxxx clause xx th xxxxxxxxx Pp x The xxxxxxxxxx detention xx juveniles xxx considered xxxxxxxxxx purpose xxxx in xxxxx common xxxxx The xxxxxxxxx would xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx from xxx danger xx pre- xxxxx crime xxx objective xxxxxxx by xxx court xxxxx to xx fundamental xxxxxxxx claimed xx due xxxxxxx clause xxxxxxxxx since xxxxxxxxx detention xx not xxxxxxxxxx to xx punishment xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx on xxx subject xx put xx probation xxx case xxx terminated xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx but xxxx not xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx pursuant xxx rationaleThe xxxxxxxx of xxx case xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx who xxx charged xxxxxxx hitting xxxxx with xxxxxx gun xxxxx US xxxxxxx court xxxx backward xx ensuring xxxxx protection xxxxx due xxxxxxx clause xx juvenile xxx The xxx York xxxxxx Court xxx held xxx section xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx preventive xxxxxxxxx would xxxxxxx the xxxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxx again xx released xx accused xxxxxxxxxxx detention xx constitutionally xxxxx under x i x due xxxxxxx clause xxxx The xxxx significanceThe xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx case xxxx in xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx dispute xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx detention xx constitutionally xxxxx or xxx for xxx juveniles xxx US xxxxxxxxxxxx could xxxx the xxxxxxxx for xxx juveniles xxxxxx step xxxxxxxx to xxx efforts xx providing xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx and xxxxx American xxxxx under xxx process xxxxxx This xxxx was xxxxxxx transferred xx the xxx York xxxxxx court xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx detention xxx sanctioned xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx and xxx valid xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx that xx the xxxx interests xx society xxx people xxx statute xxxxxxxx under xxxxxxxxxx detention xx juvenile xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx risk xx the xxxxxxx and xxxx might xxxxxx another xxxxx before xxxxx so xxxx case xxxxxx to xx legitimate xxxxx objective xxx ethical xxxxxxxxxxx was xx such xxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxx in xxx case xxx accused xxx found xxxxxx for xxxx he xxx punished xx trial xxx pre-trial xxxxxxxxx was xxxxxxxxx Christ-centred xxxxxxxxxxxxx this xxxx the xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx gun xxx has xxx committed xxx crime xxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxx is xxxxxxxxxx as xx act xx violation xx sanctity xx Christianity xxx juveniles xxx not xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx these xxxxx of xxxxxxx According xx Christianity xxxxx punishments xxx considered xxxx useful xxxx preventive xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx should xx punished xx front xx public xx that xxxx will xxxxxx their xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxx crime xx they xxxx not xxxx those xxxxxxx then xxx mere xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx should xxx be xxxx as x major xxxxxx to xxx society xxxx Roper xx Simmons x Capital xxxxxxxxxxxxx facts xx the xxxxxx the xxxx of xxxxx v xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx Court xx US xxxxxxx review xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx death xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx defendants xxxxxxxxxx under xxx years xx the xxxxxx of xxxxx The xxxx was xxxxx Christopher xxxxxxx who xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxx of xxxxxxx Crook xxx charged xxx sentenced xx death xx time xx committing xxxxx his xxx was xxxxx old xx was xxxxx guilty xxxx first xxxxxx murder xxx a xxxxx penalty xxxxxxx in xxxxx he xxx found xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx Supreme xxxxx reconsidered xxx case xxx invalidated xxx death xxxxxxxxx The xxxxx dogged xxxx juvenile xxxxx s xxxxxxx punishment xxxxxxxx th xxxxxxxxx rsquo x provision xxxxxxx odd xxxxxxxxxx under xxxxx Evolving xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx Test xxxxx The xx Supreme xxxxx heard xxx case xxx upheld xxx death xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxx by xxxxxxxx under xxxxx years xxx American xxxxxxxxxxxxx Association xxx legal xxxxxxxx legal xxxxxx under xxxx case xxxx doing xxx eight xxxxxxxxxx forbid xxx obligation xx the xxxxx punishment xx juveniles xxx fall xxxxx years xx age xxxxxxx U x was xxxxxxxx to xx the xxxxxxxx decisions xx US xxxxx where xxxxxxxx death xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxx committed xx character xxxxx years xx age xxx unconstitutional xxx years xxxx the xx court xxxxxxxxx abolished xxx death xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxx court xxxxxx barbaric xxxxxx in xxxxxxxx history xxx holdingThe xxxxxxxxx in xxxx case xxx that xxxxxxxxx issued xx March xxxxx - xxx being xxxxxxx to xxxxxx death xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxx committed xx child xxxxx years xx age xxx standards xx decency xxxx evolved xxx majority xx consensus xxx against xxx juvenile xxxxx penalty xxxxx among xxxxx legislature xxx rationaleThe xxxxxxxxx for xxxx case xxxxxxxxx about xxx abolishing xxx juvenile xxxxx penalty xxx due xx barbaric xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx in xxxxxxxx justice xxxxxxx it xxx allied xx every xxxxxx that xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx death xxxxxxxxx would xx ended xxx majority xx the xxxxxxx of xxxxx rsquo x bench xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx lack xxx responsibility xxx maturity xx the xxxxxxx and xxxxx punishments xxx seen xx be xxxxxxxxxx The xxxx significanceThe xxxxxxxxxx of xxx case xxxx in xxx facts xxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx sentences xxx juveniles xxx supreme xxxxx tried xx build x consensus xx adolescents xxxx of xxxxxxxx vulnerability xxxxxx due xx unconstructive xxxxxxxxxx imperfect xxxxxxxxx development xxx absence xx responsibility xxx major xxxxxx behind xxx granting xxx evolving xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx degrading xxxxxxxxxxx even xx convicted xxxxxxxxx Legal xxxxxxxxxxx Institute xxx ethical xxxxxxxxxxx was xx such xxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxx because xxx US xxxxx already xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx committed xx children xxxxx age xx would xxx penalised xx death xxxxxxxxxxxxxx perspectiveIn xxxxxxx times xxxxxxxxxxxx strongly xxxxxxx death xxxxxxx in xxxxx case xxxx never xxxxxx an xxx for xx eye xx this xxx the xxxxx world xxxx become xxxxx They xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx for xxx others xxx in xxx case xx any xxxxxxxx committing xxxx heinous xxxxx they xxxxx want xx give xxxx chance xx repent xxx ask xxx forgiveness xxxx the xxx Juveniles xxx vulnerable xxx are xxx fully xxxxxxx so xxxx should xx given xxx chance xx change xxxxxxxxxx One xxxxxx never xxxxxx other xxxxx beings xxx it xx condemned xx this xxxxxxxx Strict xxxxxxxxxxx should xx given xx the xxxxxxxx but xxxx do xxx support xxxxxxx punishment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Psychological xxxxxxxxxxx Roper x Simmons xxxxx www xxx org xxxxxxxxx September xxxx https xxx apa xxx about xxxxxxx ogc xxxxxx roper xxxxx Information xxxxxxxxx ROPER x SIMMONS xxx cornell xxx Retrieved xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx www xxx cornell xxx supct xxxx - xx html xxxxx NEXIS xxxxxx v xxxxxx Case xxxxx for xxx School xxxxxxxxxx Community xxxxxxxxx September xxxx https xxx lexisnexis xxx community xxxxxxxxx p xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx martin xxxx Schall x Martin xxxxx www xxxx org xxxxxxxxx September xxxx https xxx oyez xxx cases xMore Articles From CRIMINAL LAW MANAGEMENT
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
