Question.3651 - Answer one of the two sets of questions:--Discuss the validity of Mead’s ideas of “functional superiority” and the creation of a universal democracy. Do you agree that we can develop a “universal discourse” through taking the attitude of an abstract, generalized other? Explain. Can/should Mead’s ideas be applied to problems of democracy in the 21st century? Why or why not?--Apply Merton’s theory of deviance to the ongoing opioid crisis in the United States. In what ways are the values of U.S. society out of sync with the means to achieve them, and how does this help us understand the opioid crisis? Be sure to make 2 posts--your original post and at least one reply to a classmate's. Also be sure use at least one concept from this week's readings (and earlier chapters and outside sources if useful), define and apply each concept you incorporate into your post, and include in-text citations with page numbers and a reference list (or bibliography) in APA style.
Answer Below:
Mead x ideas xx Functional xxxxxxxxxxx George xxxxxxx Mead x idea xxxxxxxxxxxx focused xx functional xxxxxxxxxxx and xxx creation xx a xxxxxxxxx democracy xx the xxxxxxxx of xx abstract xxxxxxxxxxx other xxxxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxx rather xxxxxxx framework xxx understanding xxxxxx interactions xxx democracy xx nexus xxxx this xxx functional xxxxxxxxxxx concept xxxxxx refers xx the xxxx that xxxxxxx social xxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx have xxxx considered xxxxxxxx since xxxx function xxxx effectively xxxxxx a xxxxx social xxxxxx On xxx other xxxx Mead xxxx focused xx universal xxxxxxxxx where xxx individual xxxxx transcend xxxxxxxxxx biases xx adopting xx abstract xxxxxxxxxxx perspective xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx view xx society xxxxxxxxxxxx fairer xxx more xxxxxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxxx on xxx validity xx Mead x idea xx universal xxxxxxxxx aligns xxxxxxxxxxxxx with xxx ideals xx empathy xxx fairness xxxxxxxxx democratic xxxxxxxxxx where xxxxxxx voices xxx needs xxxx been xxxxxxxxxx Appelrouth xxxxx On xxx other xxxx there xxx been xx assumption xxxx adopting x generalized xxxxxxxxxxx might xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx interactions xxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx contexts xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx implication xx these xxxxx would xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx approach xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx social xxx political xxxxxxxxxx Similarly xx modern xxxxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxxx political xxxxxxxxxxxx misinformation xxx entrenched xxxxxx inequalities xxxx significant xxxxxxxxxx to xxx application xx Mead x ideas xxxxxxxxx On xxx contrary xxxxx ideas xxxxx be xxxx beneficial xxx promoting xxxxxxxxxxx democratic xxxxxxxxx encouraging xxxxxxx inclusivity xxx understanding xxxxxxx while xxxxxxxx for xxx universal xxxxxxxxxxx as xxxx s xxxx it xxxxx to xx accompanied xx concrete xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx address xxxxx challenges xxx promote xxxxxxx inclusivity xxxxxxxxxx Appelrouth x Edles x D xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx sociological xxxxxx Text xxx readings xxxx Publications xxxxxxxxx R xxxxxx Herbert xxxx and xxx Promise xx Pragmatist xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx Herbert xxxx -More Articles From Judiciary
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
