Question.1061 - Read the article:Eaglesham, J., & Schwartz, L. (2020, Feb 06). Ernst & Young Won a Multimillion-Dollar Audit Spot. Investigators Want to Know Why. SEC looking into allegations a finance executive rigged audit competition for Sealed Air contract. Wall Street Journal (Online), available in the UMGC library.Accounting reform occurred after significant corporate misconduct was discovered in the early 1980s. Some of the reform sought to require public companies to put the hiring and pay of their auditors in the hands of an independent audit board committee. There has been concern that management still has significant influence on the evaluation and final decisions. Phillip Lamoreaux, an accounting professor at Arizona State University, conducted a study of more than 2,000 auditor changes in publicly traded companies. He found that companies whose top executives had worked with a Big Four accounting firm were twice as likely to select that firm. Many executives make their way into corporate America through the largest accounting firms in the world. A chief accountant in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) stated that auditor independence is "critical to the integrity of the whole process."Currently, a criminal investigation of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) is underway related to allegations of so-called bid rigging. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), bid rigging is an unethical process which can be illegal. When soliciting competitive bids from potential auditors, competitors should not be allowed to coordinate or collaborate their bidding strategy based on information shared with other bidders. Some examples include taking turns being the low bidder, sitting out of the bidding process, and providing high bids to cover up the bid rigging process. As the above study noted, close ties with accounting firms by company executives can eliminate objectivity in selection decisions. William Stiehl and Carol Lowe were top executives at Sealed Air, a bubble wrap manufacturer in 2015 when they appointed EY as their auditor. Previously, the two were top executives at Carlisle Cos. when EY was selected as auditor. The SEC and North Carolina prosecutors are looking into whether bid rigging occurred through Stiehl sharing KPMG's bid with EY to help them win the auditing contract. Sealed Air fired Stiehl, terminated their relationship with EY, and hired PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The reason for the termination of EY by Sealed Air was a result of "dissatisfaction with information it learned about the process by which EY was selected as auditor."Over the last twenty years, the SEC has taken roughly 100 enforcement actions for not supporting auditor independence guidelines and mandates. Of those investigated, very few dealt with corporate senior management. Both Lowe and Stiehl worked with EY as their auditors in three separate companies. EY released a statement saying, "...our clients value the quality of our work and if they move to a different company, they hire us again."Dr. O.C. Ferrell and Dr. Linda Ferrell with Auburn University wrote this case with the approval and collaboration of the Daniels Fund, which provides open access to their learning resources.Consider:1) What caused the SEC to question EY's independence?2) Research EY's history for other instances where its independence was questioned. Discuss your findings.
Answer Below:
After xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx the xxx and xxxxx Carolina xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxxxxxx allegations xx bid xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx EY xx the xxxxxxx for xxxxxx Air xx awarding xxx auditing xxx contract xx EY xx Sealed xxx the xxx Securities xxx Exchange xxxxxxxxxx Questioned xxxxx amp xxxxx LLP's xxxxxxxxxxxx due xx bid xxxxxxx According xx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxx rigging xx means xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx illegal xxxxxxxxx where xxxxxxxxxxx in x bidding xxxxxxx collaborate xx coordinate xxxxx strategies xxxxxxxxx amp xxxxxxxx In xxxx scenario xx was xxxx that x top xxxxxxxxx at xxxxxx Air xxx have xxxxxx KPMG's xxx with xx to xxxx EY xxx the xxxxxxxx contract xxxxxxx reason xxxx caused xxx to xxxxxxxx EY's xxxxxxxxxxxx is xxxx they xxx the xxxxxxx of xxx doubt xxxx Stiehl xxx Carol xxxx had xxxxxxxxxx worked xxxx EY xx auditors xx other xxxxxxxxx Their xxxxxxxxxxxx with xx could xxxxxxxxx their xxxxxxxxx Eaglesham xxx Schwartz xxxxxx Brothers x significant xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx services xxxx declared xxxxxxxxxx during xxx financial xxxxxx nbsp xx hired xx as xxx auditor xxxxxxx et xx Concerns xxxx raised xxxxxxxxx EY's xxxx in xxxxxxxxx Lehman's xxxxxxxxx statements xxxx and xxxxxxx or xxx EY xxx accurately xxxxxxxxx Lehman's xxxxxxxxx situation xxxxxx nbsp xxx collapse xxxx led xx lawsuits xxx investigations xxxx EY's xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx practices xxxxxxxxxx Eaglesham x amp xxxxxxxx L xxx Ernst xxx Young xxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Audit xxxx Investigators xxxx to xxxx Why xxxxxxx Rosalind x Bennett xxxxxxxx L xxx Metrick xxxxxx The xxxxxx Brothers xxxxxxxxxx D xxx Role xx Ernst xxx Young xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Crises xxx Iss xxxxx Available xx https xxxxxxxxxx library xxxx edu xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx vol xxxMore Articles From Accounting
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
