Question.2771 - ·Task: The multiple-source essay asks you to synthesize the arguments of at least 10 sources ·Length: 2000-3000 words ·Format: APA ·Sources: a total of at least 10 sources, all of which should be from scholarly journals or credible trade journals. You should find your sources through library searches. If you cite sources from websites or popular journals, these sources should be in addition to the 10 sources you have cited from scholarly or trade journals. ·Topic: Please use the same topic that you used for writing assignments #1 and #2. It is recommended that you focus on or expand on the essay that you wrote for writing assignment #2. You will continue with the topic you have selected and will conduct additional searches in the library databases, hopefully, focusing on the topic more, and determining the 10 or more sources to use in this essay. Please note that this is a review of the literature on a topic. It is not a persuasive essay using sources to support a point. Rather it is an overview of the current research on a topic. Integration of Sources: At least eight sources must be cited in the body of the essay. You may cite sources in your introduction to help you define terms, and you may cite sources in your conclusion to help you direct the reader to further inquiry. However, the body of the essay should synthesize at least 8 sources.Strategies for Developing the Topic for this EssayUp to this point in the semester, you have completed an annotated bibliography on your chosen topic. You have also incorporated and synthesized six sources into writing assignment #2. The work you have completed for these assignments provides a solid foundation for writing assignment #3. In this assignment, you will synthesize the ideas of at least 10 sources in a synthesis essay, or literature review. For your annotated bibliography, you selected a topic based on your interests and, potentially, your major. You constructed a list of five references and summarized and critically analyzed them in 150-200 words each. You then completed the six-source essay and synthesized sources. Through this process, you may have seen patterns inthe scholarly literature in the topic on which you conducted research. For example, consider the following examples: •You may have researched studies in criminal justice and found that there are varying opinions on how to respond to criminal behavior among youth. •·You may have researched studies in psychology and found that counseling strategies for victims of domestic abuse tend to fall into four categories. •·You may have researched articles on gerontology and found studies that answered three basic questions on how older adults respond to training for physical performance. •·You may have researched articles on environmental management and found studies on climate change. You noticed that various demographic factors influence whether individuals believe in climate change and, if so, whether they believe it is caused by human activity. In the synthesis essay, you will focus your research efforts in a particular area, as a response to what you found while writing the annotated bibliography and in constructing the six-source essay. You will then conduct more research and synthesize your findings in this literature review. Please note that the annotated bibliography and the six-source essay represent a journey in your research. You might decide to disregard several of the articles you analyzed in the critical annotated bibliography or in the following essay because they do not speak to the specific area on which you have decided to write your multiple-source literature review. You might select one article that you analyzed in the critical annotated bibliography, look up the articles cited in that article, and “snowball” your research in that way. In other words, this process is a recursive one. You might find reasons to hone in on and narrow your topic even further after you have written the annotated bibliography. For these reasons, you are strongly encouraged to write on the same general topic on which you wrote writing assignment #2. You might focus on the topic more for writing assignment #3. Or you might expand on the topic for writing assignment #3.How to organize the multiple-source essay:You will divide the essay into categories. Each category will be labeled with a heading. For you to see this concept with a real-life example, you can access a sample synthesis or literature review from a psychology student that you can find in Week 7 Content/Resources under PSYCHSample_LitReview.The student authors her paper on the following topic: Emotional Eating: The Perpetual Cycle of MoodFood Influence. She divides her literature into the following categories, which are used as headings throughout the paper: •Influence of Mood on Eating Behavior •Gender Differences •Influence of Eating Behavior on Later Moods •Chronic Stress Response Network Notice how she synthesizes and integrates the research into distinct categories, labeled by headings.Strategies for Developing CategoriesWhen you have focused on your topic, determine how you will divide the literature. In other words, consider the following examples we described above: You may have researched studies in criminal justice and found that there are varying opinions on how to respond to criminal behavior among youth. You might divide the paper as follows: Introduction Body ? ·Category 1: “A” view on responding to criminal behavior. ? ·Category 2: “B” view on responding to criminal behavior. ? ·Category 3: “C” view on responding to criminal behavior. ? ·Category 4: “D” view on responding to criminal behavior. Conclusion You may have researched studies in psychology and found that counseling strategies for victims of domestic abuse tend to fall into four categories. You might divide the paper as follows: Introduction Body ? ·Category 1: “A” counseling strategy for victims of child abuse ? ·Category 2: “B” counseling strategy for victims of child abuse ? ·Category 3: “C” counseling strategy for victims of child abuse ? ·Category 4: “D” counseling strategy for victims of child abuse ConclusionYou may have researched articles on gerontology and found studies that answered three basic questions on how older adults respond to training for physical performance. You might divide the paper as follows: Introduction Body ? ·Question 1 ? ·Question 2 ? ·Question 3 Conclusion You may have researched articles on environmental management and found studies on climate change. You noticed that various demographic factors influence whether individuals believe in climate change and, if so, whether they believe it is caused by human activity. You might divide the paper as follows: Introduction Body ? ·Political affiliation and its impact on belief in climate change ? ·Socio-economic status and its impact on belief in climate change ? ·Religious and other influences on belief in climate change ConclusionPoint of viewFor this essay, you will use a third-person point of view. Please do not use the first person point of view (e.g., “I,” “me,” “we”) in writing this essay. In addition, please do not use a second-person point of view (“you” or “your”) in writing this essay. For example, instead of “Smith argues that, as a director, you have a duty to coordinate cybersecurity efforts...” you would write, “Smith argues that directors have a duty to coordinate cybersecurity efforts...”APA StyleThe paper should be formatted in APA style. The link “APA 7th edition example student paper” from Week 3 will be a helpful resource. In summary, you should observe the following: ? ·Use one-inch margins. ? ·Double space.? ·Use size 12 Times New Roman font. ? ·Include a running head. ? ·Include page numbers. ? ·Include a title page. ? ·Include a “References” page on which you list the articles in APA style ? ·Do not include an abstract. This paper is not long enough to warrant an abstract.Submitting the assignment:You will submit a first draft of the essay to the assignment folder. The first draft will not be graded. The instructor will provide comments on it. After receiving comments from the instructor, you will submit a revised draft. The final draft will be graded.Helpful Resources:·Graff, G. and Birkenstein, C., They Say / I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing with Readings. This chapter is in the Course Resources in our class. It mentions various techniques to apply when stating what an author said and your response to an author.
Answer Below:
IntroductionThe xxxxx penalty xx a xxxxxxxx issue xxxxxxxxx History xxx seen xxxxxx punishment xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xx numerous xxxxx Since xx benefits xxx public xxxx convicts xx may xxxxxxx the xx nbsp xxxxxxxxx The xxxxx penalty xx capital xxxxxxxxxx has xxxx applied xx the xxxxx offenses xxxxx civilization xxxxx However xxxx claim xxxx the xxxxxxxxx process xx cruel xxx unusual xxxxxxxxxx Researchers xxxx Salk xxx have xxxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xxxxx s xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx execution xxxxxxxxx say xxxxx row xxxxxxx are xxxxxxx inhumanely xxx death xxxxxxxx has xxxxxx been xxxxxxxxxxxxx due xx people xxxxx s xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx about xxx application xxx many xxx still xxxxxxxx about xx What xx the xxxxx Penalty xxx legal xxxxxxxxx by xxxxx a xxxxxxxx who xxx been xxxxxxxxx of x crime xx put xx death xx the xxxxx the xxxxx penalty xxxx known xx capital xxxxxxxxxx in xxxx jurisdictions xxxx criminal xxxxxxxxxxx are xxxx handed xxxx after xx accused xxxxxx has xxxx put xxxxxxx a xxxxx and xxxxx guilty xxxxxx any xxxxx At x later xxxxx in xxx sentencing xxxxxxx either xxx jury xx the xxxxx will xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xx the xxxxxxxxx or x lesser xxxx such xx life xxxxxxxx the xxxxx sentence xx designed xx deter xxxxxx from xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx activity xx the xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx by xxxxx it xx conducted xx typically xxxx a xxxxxx Banner xxxxxx that xxxxx they xxxxxxx it xx private xxxxx The xxxxxxxxx effect xx the xxxxxxxxxx has xxxx called xxxx doubt xxxxxxxxxxxx considering xxxxxxxxxxxx viewpoints xx human xxxxxx Despite xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx problems xxxxxxx states xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx the xxx of xxx death xxxxxxx while xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxxx done xxxx with xxx practice xxx Death xxxxxxx Past xxx PresentThe xxxxx sentence xxx a xxxx history xxxxxx back xx prehistoric xxxxx Repeat xxxxxxxxx have xxxx punished xxxx way xxxxxxxxxxxx ldquo xxx death xxxxxxx was xxx norm xxxx for xxxxxxxxxx crimes xxxx burglary xxx counterfeiting xxxxx and xxx believed xx was xxxxx Today xxxx believe xxx death xxxxxxxx should xxxx be xxxx for xxx worst xxxxxxxx Banner xxxxxxxx executions xxxx been xxxxxxxxx for x long xxxx the xxxxx first xxxxxxxx execution xx what xxxxx eventually xxxxxx the xxxxxx States xxxxxxxx in xxxxx Archibald xxxx changed xxxx times xxxxx Death xxxxxxx rdquo xxxxxxxxx Salk xxxx that xxxxx states xxxxxx began xx legalize xxx use xx lethal xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx it xxx seen xx a xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx way xx go xx compared xx other xxxxx of xxxxxxx punishment xxxxx the xxxxx sentence xxxxx is xxxxxxx in xxxx countries xxxxxxx widespread xxxxxxx The xxxxx penalty xxx look xxxxxxxxx depending xx where xxxx live xxxx countries xxxx reinstated xxx death xxxxxxx while xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx it xxxx though xxxxxxxxxx have xxxxxxxx the xx is xxx of xxx few xxxxxxx nations xxxx a xxxxxxx punishment xxxxxxx In xxxxxx decades xxx death xxxxxxxx has xxxx hotly xxxxxxx due xx concerns xxxx it xx neither xxxx nor xxxxxxxxx as x deterrent xxxx argue xxxx executing xx innocent xxxxxx makes xxx death xxxxxxx immoral xxx unjust xxxx say xxxx is xxxxxxx innocent xxxxxxxxxxx could xx executed xxx illegal xxxxxx of xxxxxxx person xxxxx s xxxx on xxxxxxx such xx in xx execution xx reprehensible xx a xxxxxx of xxxxx concerns xxxxx is x growing xxxxxxxxxxxxx movement xx do xxxx with xxx death xxxxxxx and xxxx governments xxxx chosen xx replace xxx death xxxxxxx with xxxx sentences xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx Debates xx the xxxxx PenaltyPeople xxxxxxxx on xxx death xxxxxxx rsquo x efficacy xxx appropriateness xxxxxx it xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx Haney xx al xxxxxx California xxx Hampshire xxx Florida xxxxxxxxx about xxx death xxxxxxx by xxxxx Less xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxx state xxxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxx state xxxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xxx death xxxxxxx is xxxxxx support xxxxxxxxxx as xxxxx respondents xxxxxxx it xxxx in xxxxxxxx times xxxxx et xx The xxxxxx opposes xxx death xxxxxxx due xx system xxxxxxxx Haney xxx colleagues xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx penalty xxxxxxxxx may xx lowering xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx toward xxx death xxxxxxxx supports xxx belief xxxx most xxxxxx think xx is xxxxx and xxxxxxx Wrongful xxxxxxxxxxx affect xxxxxx opinion xx the xxxxx penalty xxx to xxx high xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxx segment xx the xxxxxxxx no xxxxxx supports xxx system xxxx individuals xxxxx that xxxxxx support xxx death xxxxxxx more xxxx Black xxxxxxxxxx Supporting xxxxxxxx executions xx suggests xxxx Black xxxxxx rsquo x reluctance xx accept xxx death xxxxxxx stems xxxx a xxxxxxx mistrust xx the xxxxxxx system xxxxxxxxx groups xxxx different xxxxxx of xxxxx in xxx legal xxxxxx which xxxxxxx their xxxxx on xxx death xxxxxxx Wu xxxxx that x person xxxxx s xxxxxx in xxx chance xx an xxxxxxxxx conviction xxx a xxxxxxxx indicator xx their xxxxx penalty xxxxxxx Support xxx the xxxxx penalty xxxxx when xxxxxxxx people xxx likely xx be xxxxxxxx Previous xxxxx on xxxxx penalty xxxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx research xxxxxx and xxx government xxxxxxxx on xxx death xxxxxxx When xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xx is xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx legal xxxxxx and xxxxxxx issues xx society xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx grows xxx death xxxxxxxx must xx interrogated xxxxxxx Used xxx Capital xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx injection xxx other xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxxxxxx Salk xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx chamber xxxxxxxxxxxx have xxxxxxxx hanging xxx firing xxxxxx Since xxx th xxxx century xxxxxx injections xxxx overtaken xxxxxxx as xxx least xxxxxxxxx method xx execution xx the xx Salk xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx pain xxx suffering xxxxxx execution xx more xxxxxxxxx than xxxx even xxxxxx the xxxxx penalty xx unethical xxxx lethal xxxxxxxxx must xxxx clear xxxxxxxx and xxxxx Harrison xxx Melville xxxxxxxx whether xxxxx injections xxx more xxxxxxxx than xxxxx capital xxxxxxxxxxx Inhumane xxxxxxxxxx violates xxx Eighth xxxxxxxxx they xxx Harrison xxx Melville xxxxxx ldquo xx would xxxxxx that xxx matter xx thus xxxxxxxx capital xxxxxxxxxx as xx stands xx current xx death xxxxxxx statutes xx not xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx be xxxxxxx as xxxxx or xxxxxxx punishment xxxxx the xx nbsp xxxxxxxxx rdquo xxxxxx injection xx still xxxxxxxx in xxxx death xxxxxxx countries xxxxxxx its xxxxxxxx nature xxxx of xxxxxxxxxx botched xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx medications xxxxxxx pain xxx suffering xxx some xxxxxxxxxxxx Harrison xxx Melville xxxxxxx evidence xxxx that xxxxx by xxxxxxxxx has xxx improved xxxxxxxxxx despite xxx stated xxxx These xxxxxxx are xxxx to xxxxxxx condemned xxxxxxxxx in xxxx states xxxx still xxx the xxxxx penalty xxx there xx some xxxxxxxxx because xxxxxxxxx jurisdictions xxx different xxxxxx medications xxx procedures xxxxxxxxxxxxx death xxxxxxx has xxxxxx been x divisive xxxxx worldwide xxxxx civilization xxxxx it xxx been xxxx to xxxxxx serious xxxxxxxxx although xx has xxxx criticized xxx being xxxxxxxx and xxxxx Death xxxxxxxxx are xxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx future xxxxx but xxxxx execution xx usually xxxx a xxxxxx Despite xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx issues xxxx states xxxxx use xxx death xxxxxxxx while xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx it xxx ambivalence xxxx people xxxx regarding xxx death xxxxxxx lends xxxxxxxx to xxx idea xxxx the xxxx majority xx people xxxxxxxx it xx be xxxxx and xxxxxxx punishment xxx support xxx the xxxxx penalty xx far xxxxxx than xxxx of xxx Black xxxxxxxxxx which xx one xxxxxx that xxxxx to xxx racial xxxxxx among xxxxx who xxx in xxxxx of xxx death xxxxxxxx As x result xx structural xxxxx there xxx been x recent xxxxx toward xxxx approval xxx the xxxxx sentence xxxxx challenges xxxxxxx wrongful xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx information xxx distrust xx the xxxxxxxx justice xxxxxx Nowadays xxxxxxxxx regarding xxx usefulness xxx acceptability xx the xxxxx sentence xxxxxxxx to xx discussed xx they xxxx on xxxx this xxxxxxxxxxxx it xx imperative xxxx they xxxx in xxxx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxx the xxxx of xxxxxxx human xxxxx the xxxx of xxxxxx the xxxx of xx innocent xxxxxx and xxx requirement xxx alternative xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx human xxxxxx ReferencesArchibald x N xxxxxxx Punishment xx the x S xxxxxx Executing xxxxxx Inequality xxx Scholarly xxxxxxxxxx LLC xxxxx search-ebscohostcom xxxxxxx umgc xxx login xxxx direct xxxx amp xx nlebk xxx AN xxx site xxxxxxx amp xxxxx site xxxxxx Stuart xxx Death xxxxxxx An xxxxxxxx History xxxxxxx University xxxxx https xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ezproxy xxxx edu xxx ebookviewer xxxxx bmxlYmtfXzI xxxxxx fQU xxx ce x e-be xx e xx cf- x f x redis xxx vid xxx format xx amp xxx Haney x Zurbriggen x L xxx Weill x M xxx continuing xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx qualification xxxxxxxx death xxxxxxx attitudes xxx capital xxxx selection xxxxxxxxxx Public xxxxxx and xxx ndash xxxxx doiorg xxxxxxx umgc xxx law xxxxxxxx K xxx Melville x The xxxxx Penalty xx Lethal xxxxxxxxx and xxxx v xxxxxxxxx Is xxx USA xxxxxxxx to xxx Sense xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Law xxxxx https xxxxxxx ezproxy xxxx edu xxxx Salk x Lethal xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx Territory xxx Need xx Ensure xxx Humanity xx Current xxxxx Penalty xxxxxxxxx Criminal xxxxxxx Ethics xxxxx https xxxxxx ezproxy xxxx edu x Wu x The xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Conviction xxxx on xxxxx Penalty xxxxxxx and xxx It xxxxxx the xxxxxx Gap xxxxxxxx Journal xx Criminal xxxxxxx ndash xxxxx doi-org xxxxxxx umgc xxx s x - x nbspMore Articles From LAW
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
