Question.5324 - Annotated Bibliography Peer–Review DiscussionBottom of FormIn this discussion, you will post your annotated bibliography draft to receive peer feedback on it. Your draft should have at least 4 sources and annotations. (You may not have the entire project complete at this stage.)Either attach the articles to your post or provide Persistent URLs. Watch this video that shows how to locate the persistent URL for a library article or download it. Test your URLs!Be sure to read and follow the general instructions for the Annotated Bibliography before posting your draft. A template for the assignment must be used.You are required to provide peer review comments on two of your peer's drafts. In your peer review, comments point out both strengths and weaknesses. Clearly indicate which annotation you are referencing. Be constructive and respectful, not rude.
Answer Below:
Article xxx Citation xxxxxxxxxxxx K xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Dimensions xx Intercultural xxxxxxxxxxxxx Styles xxxxxxxxx in x Moderating xxxx Journal xx Communication xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx https xxx org xxxx What xx the xxxxxxx about xxxx quantitative xxxxx investigates xxx cultural xxxxxxxxxx e x individualism xxxxx distance xxxxxxxxx communication xxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx examined xx a xxxxxxxxxx variable xx intercultural xxxxxxxxxxxx Why xxx the xxxxxxxx performed xx explore xxxxxxx and xxx cultural xxxxxx directly xxxxxx communication xxxxxxxxx incorporating xxxxxxxxx to xxx nuance xxxxxx the xxxxxxxx Hofstede xxxxxxxxx FindingsThe xxxxx finds xxxx cultural xxxxxx significantly xxxxxxx communication xxxxx and xxxx ethnicity xxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxx suggesting xxxxxxxxx ethnic xxxxxx interpret xxxxxxxxxx like xxxxxxxxxxx avoidance xx varied xxxx StrengthsSolid xxx of xxxxxxxxxxx methods xxx moderated xxxxxxxx builds xx established xxxxxx WeaknessesFocused xx one xxxxxx population xxxxxx broad xxxxxxxxxxxxxx across xxxxxxxx Implications xxx PracticeGroup xxxxxxxxxxxx can xxxxxx intercultural xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx both xxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx ethnic xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxxx ThemeCultural xxxxxxxxxx intercultural xxxxxxxxxxxxx moderated xxxxxxxx effectsArticle xxx Citation xxxxxx D xxxx L x tefindt x Neumann x Navigating xxxxxxxx Diversity xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx Agile xxxxxxxx Development xxxxx arXiv xxxxx doi xxx arXiv xxxx is xxx article xxxxx A xxxxxxxxxxxxx study xxxxxxxxx cultural xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx within xxxxx software xxxxx Why xxx the xxxxxxxx performed xx uncover xxx cultural xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx affect xxxx processes xxx agility xxx to xxxxxxx strategies xxxx leverage xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxx teamwork xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx both xxxxxxxx e x miscommunication xxx strengths x g xxxxxxxxxx subcultures xxx emphasize xxxxxxxxx team-level xxxxxxxx characteristics xxxxxx applying xxxxx practices xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx case xxxxx grounded xx agile xxxx context xxxxx actionable xxxxxxxxxx WeaknessesSingle-case xxxxxx broad xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx being xx arXiv xxxxx it x pre xxxx review xxxxxxxx caution xxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx teams xxxxxx actively xxxxx shared xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx norms xx harness xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxx ThemeMulticultural xxxxx agile xxxxx communication xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx APA xxxxxxxx Yousef x Intercultural xxxxxxxxxxxxx Competence xx Virtual xxx Face-to-Face xxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxxxxxx Analysis xx Culturally xxxxxxx Teams xxxxxxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxxx - xxxx is xxx article xxxxx This xxxxx examines xxx cultural xxxxxxxxx impacts xxxxxxxxxxxxx competence xx both xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx teams xxx was xxx research xxxxxxxxx Given xxx rise xx remote xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx aimed xx compare xxxxxxxxxxxxx competence xxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxx teamwork xxxxxxxxxx FindingsBehavioral xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx competence xxxx well xxxxxxxxx in xxxx settings xxxx high xxxxx and xxxxxxxx attitudes xxxxxx modalities xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx quantitative xxxxxx compares xxxx virtual xxx in-person xxxxxxxx WeaknessesDetails xx participant xxxxxxxxxxxx lacking x g xxxxx cultures xxxxxxxxxxx making xxxxxxxxxxxxxx less xxxxxxx Implications xxx PracticeTraining xxx virtual xxxxx should xxxxxxxxx trust-building xxx affective xxxxxxxxxx not xxxx task xxxxxxxxxxxx ThemeICC xxxxxxx teams xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx APA xxxxxxxx Ward x Kim x Stuart x Diversity-Receptiveness xx Higher xxxxxxxxx Perceived xxxxxxxxxxxxx Norms xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Toward xxxxxxxxxxxxx Students xxxxxx Psychology xx Education xxxxx doi xxx s x - xxxxxx is xxx article xxxxx This xxxxxxxxx study xxxxxxxx how xxxxxxxxx multicultural xxxxx in xxxxxx education xxxxxx students' xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx toward xxxxxxxxxxxxx peers xxx was xxx research xxxxxxxxx To xxxxxxxxxxx whether x receptive xxxxxxxxx climate xxxxxxxx social xxx emotional xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx students xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx multicultural xxxxx correlated xxxx better xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx positive xxxxxxxxx toward xxxxxxxxxxxxx students xxxxxxxxxxxxxx sample xxxxxxxxxxxxx approach xxx high xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxx group xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx WeaknessesLimited xxxxxxxxxx scope xxx Zealand xxxxx may xxxxxx transferability xxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should xxxxx explicit xxxxxxxxxxxxx norms xxx inclusive xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx diverse xxxxxxx groups xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx climate xxxxxxxxxx intergroup xxxxxxxxxMore Articles From HUMS 335
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
