Question.4223 - EMA 600 Internal Memo RubricCourse: EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar)Assignments 2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager 2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager Criteria Ex mplary Profici nt Needs Not Evident Criterion Score Improvem nt Employees 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18 Listen Meets Details Provides Does not “Proficient” intentions for intentions for detail Hide Assignment Informaon getting to intentions for criteria and getting to Turnitin™ demonstrates know project know project getting to insight into employees employees but know project importance of fails to fully employees This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. understanding provide a mindset of detailed, Instructions employees logical approach In Module One, you reviewed the Final Project Guidelines and Questions 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18 Rubric document and the associated case study zip file. For your Meets Outlines Outlines Does not final project, you will assume the role of a newly hired engineering“Proficient” questions that questions that outlinemanagercriteriaandbroughtneedin totobereplaceneedPeterto beQ. Robinquestions.Youhavethat been askedtodemonstratdiagnosesandaskedfixtheand problemsaskedplaguingand an eedimpto rtantbe project forkeen insight identifies the identifies the asked andthe company. into the appropriate appropriate does not importance of person for person for identify the While this activity is not a milestone for your final project, it allows asking the each question each question, appropriate you to get i to the role of a new manager and expl e the case right questions but list of person for study in detail. This activity will als help you identify information to the right questions is each questio people to gain incomplete, and formulate ideas you will use to complete sections II.B the proper and/or (handshake issues), II.C (resources and personnel), and III (project tools for questions are team) of your final project. addressed to moving forward the wrong Submit your assignment here.peoplMake sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the guidelines and rubric.Hide Rubricshttps://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=3378358&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1799582 1/32/4/25, 11:43 AM 2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager - EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar) - Southern … Rubric Nam : EMA 600 Needs Internal Memo Rubric Not Evident Criterion Score Criteria Exemplary Proficient Improvement Relationship 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18 Print Meets Describes Describes Does not “Proficient” intentions for intentions for describe criteria and building building intentions for Submit demonstrates relationships relationships building Assignment with the with the relationships keen insight into the project team project team with the Files to submit importance of members members, but project team (0) file(s) to relationship with gaps in members submit building for detail and/or project logic After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission. success Add a File Record Audio Record Video 0 points / 18 Rebuild Trust 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points Meets Details Details Does not “Proficient” intentions for intentions for detail Comments criteria and rebuilding rebuilding intentions for demonstrates trust among trust among rebuilding insight into the various the various trust among importance of project teams project teams the various building trust but fails to project teams among teams fully provide a detailed, logical approach Managemen 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18 t Skills Meets Describes Describes Does not “Proficient” personal personal describe criteria and management management personal demonstrates skills that will skills that will management keen insight be be skills that will the immediately immediately be management put to use put to use, but immediately skills that will with gaps in put to use be detail and/or immediately logic applicable https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=3378358&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1799582 2/32/4/25, 11:43 AM 2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager - EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar) - Southern …CriteriaArticulation of Response Exemplary Proficient Needs Not Evident Criterion Score Improvement 10 points 9 points 7 points 0 points / 10 Submission is Submission Submission Submission free of errors has no major has major has critical related to, errors related errors related errors related grammar, to citations, to citations, to citations, spelling, grammar, grammar, grammar, syntax, and spelling, spelling, spelling, organization syntax, or syntax, or syntax, or and is organization organization organization presented in a that negatively that prevent professional impact understanding and easy-to- readability and of ideas read format articulation of main ideas Total / 100 Overall ScorePoints earned out of 10091 points minimum The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook. Points earned out of Points earned out of Points earned out of 100 100 100 71 points minimum 1 point minimum 0 points minimum The overall submission The overall submission The overall submission earned 71 points or earned 1 points or earned 0 points or more. Final calculation more. Final calculation more. Final calculation of grades can be found of grades can be found of grades can be found in the gradebook. in the gradebook. in the gradebook.
Answer Below:
Internal xxxxxxxxxx JoanemEMA- x SNHUJanuary xx To xxxxxxxxx Leadership xxxx VALID xxxxxxx Engineering xxxxxxx Lithium-Ion xxxxxxx Development xxxxxxxx January xx Introduction xxx BackgroundMy xxxxx responsibility xx the xxxxxxxx hired xxxxxxxxxxx manager xxx VALID xxx 's xxxxxxxxxxx Battery xxxxxxxxxxx Team xxxxx has xxxx to xxxxxxxxx evaluate xxx problems xxxx have xxxxxx internal xxxx strife xxx a xxxxxxx drop xx our xxxxxx share x am xxxxx of xxx recent xxxxxxxx testing xxxxxxxx of xxx new xxxxxxx prototype xxxxx did xxx satisfy xxx intended xxxxxxx stability xxxxxxxxx and xxx public xxxxxxxxx garnered xx the xxxxxx concerns xxxx lithium-ion xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxxxx delays xxx performance xxxxxxxxxx as x result xx these xxxxxxxx as xxxx as xxxxxxx team xxxxxxxx Problem xxxxxxxxxx mismatch xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx battery's xxxxxxxx heat xxxxxxxxxx and xxx dissipation xxxxxxxx was xxx cause xx the xxxx recent xxxxxxxxx failure xx VALID xxxxxxx employing xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx software xxxxx for xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx to xxx usual xxxxxxxxxxx design xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx exceeded xxx specified xxxx temperature xxxxxx during xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx department xxx already xxxxxxxxx pre-launch xxx promising x more xxxxxx battery xxxxx raised xxxxxxxxxx expectations xxx the xxxxxxxxx delivery xxxxxx this xxxxxxx much xxxx troublesome xxx team's xxxxxxxx strife xxx increasing xxxxxxxx from xxx marketing xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx deadlines xxxx the xxxxxxxxx worse xxx development xxxx is xxxxx into xxx smaller xxxxxx mechanical xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx scientists xxx work xx the xxxx dissipation xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx engineers xxx concentrate xx the xxxxxxxxx electron xxxxxxx ChallengesThe xxxxx challenges xxxx have xxxx evident xx VALID xxx have xxxx team xxxxxxx pressure xxxx marketing xxx prototype xxxxxxx For xxxxxxxx it xxx been xxxxxxx at xxxx time xxxx specifically xxx to xxx disarrangement xxxxxxx the xxxx however xx has xxxx evident xxxx interpersonal xxxxxxxxx have xxxx affecting xxx overall xxxxxxxxxxxx In xxxx scenario xxx division xx responsibilities xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxx engineers xxx the xxxxxxxxxx engineers xxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx sub-groups xxxx been xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx department's xxxxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxx ahead xx schedule xxx caused x rift xxxxxxx engineering xxx marketing xxxx the xxxxxx putting xxxxx pressure xx engineers xxx compromising xxx engineering xxxxxxx In xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx internal xxxxxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxx team xxxxxx levels xxx prototype's xxxxxxxxxxx failure xxxxxxxx possible xxxxx in xxx testing xxx validation xxxxxxxxxx More xxxxxxxx into xxx modeling xxx simulation xxxxx and xxxxxxx procedures xx required xx light xx the xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx expected xxx actual xxxxxxxxxxx readings xxxxxx testing xxxxxxx ConcernsSeveral xxxxxxx issues xxxx arisen xxxx the xxxxxxx situation xxxxxxx misleading xxxxxxxxxxxxxx test xxxxxxxxx and xxxx collaboration xxxx even xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx project xx this xxxxxxxx marketing xxx made xxxxxxxx related xx the xxx battery x capabilities xxxx had xxxx premature xxxx unresolved xxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx testing xxxxxxx raised xxxxxxxx related xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx testing xxxxxxxxxx where xxx pressure xx push xxx product xxxxxxx testing xxxxxxx safety xxxxxxxx raised xxxxxxxxx about xxx ethics xx releasing xx unsafe xxxxxxx to xxx market xxxxxxxxx Project xxx RecommendationsThe xxxxxxxxx analyses xxx recommendations xxx be xxxxxxx to xxx project xxxx Dynamics xxx Relationship xxxxxxxx Assessing xxx root xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx subgroups xx essential xxxxx when xxxxxxxxxxx whether xxxxx are xxx personalor xxxxxxxxxxxx factors xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Doloi x intend xx meet xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx from xxxx groups xxxxxxx team-building xxxxxxxxxx and xx establishing xxxxx guidelines xxx cooperation xxx communication x will xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx for xxx another xx order xx promote xxxxxxxxxxxxx and x shared xxxxxxxxxx to xxx project's xxxxxxx cross-functional xxxxxxxxx will xx started xx enhance xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx mechanical xxxxxxxxx engineering xxx electrical xxxxxxxx engineering xxxxx Rebuilding xxxxx It xx necessary xx repair xxx corrosion xxxx stakeholders xxxxxxxxxxxx marketing xxx external xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx openness xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx state xx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx deadlines xxxxxxx Goldwasser x will xxx up xxxxxxxx updates xx be xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx what xxxx wrong xxx to xxxx a xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx improvement x transparent xxxxxxxx evaluation xx the xxxxxxxxx testing xxxxxxxxx will xx carried xxx In xxxxx to xxxxx expectations xxx make xxxx that xxx future xxxxxxxxxxxxx about xxx project xxx based xx realistic xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxx place x high xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxx open xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Managing xxxxxxx Expectations x suggest x meeting xxxx the xxxxxxxxx division xx adjust xxxxx expectations xx the xxxxxxxxx existing xxxxxxxxx realities xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxx To xxxx sure xxxx no xxxxxxxx are xxxx before xxx product's xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx have xxxx confirmed xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx goals xxxx be xxxxxxxxxxx Realistic xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx development xxxxxxx and xxxxxx preparation xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxxxxx into xxx updated xxxxxxxx All xxxxxxx involved xxxxxx be xxxx fully xxxxx of xxxx schedule xxxxxxxxxx Technical xxxxxx In xxxxx of xxx marketing xxxxxxxxxxxx demand x suggest x meeting xxxx them xx adjust xxxxx expectations xx the xxxxxxxxx present xxxxxxxxx realities xxxxxxx attainable xxxxxxxxxx will xxxx to xxxxxxxxx that xx promises xxx made xxxxx the xxxxxxxxx operation xxx safety xxxx been xxxxxxxxx A xxx schedule xxxxxx be xxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxx checkpoints xxxxxxxxxx product xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx preparation xxx parties xxxxxxxx should xxxxxxx clear xxxxxxxxxxxxx about xxxx schedule xxxxxxxxxxxxx LiBDT xxxxxxx is xx a xxxxxxxx position xxxxx now xxx it xx possible xx realign xx and xxx it xxxx on xxxxx with xxxxxx leadership xxx an xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx relationships xxxxx and xxxx communication x am xxxxxxxxx that xx can xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx safe xxxxxxxxxxx battery xxxx satisfies xxxxxxxx demands xxx reestablishes xxxxx as x leader xx the xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx causes xx team xxxxxxx readjusting xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxx product xxxxxxx ReferencesDoloi x Cost xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx in xxxxxxx management xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxx stakeholders xx construction xxxxxxxx Journal xx construction xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx - xxxxxxx M x Goldwasser x A xxxxxxxx consideration xx the xxxxxx interest xx the xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx transmission xxxxxxxxxxxxx Energy xxMore Articles From Engineering