About Us Take My Online Class

Question.4223 - EMA 600 Internal Memo RubricCourse: EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar)Assignments   2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager                     2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager   Criteria Ex mplary Profici nt Needs Not Evident Criterion Score   Improvem nt                                         Employees 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18                     Listen Meets Details Provides Does not                               “Proficient” intentions for intentions for detail         Hide Assignment Informaon getting to intentions for           criteria and getting to       Turnitin™ demonstrates know project know project getting to       insight into employees employees but know project                     importance of   fails to fully employees       This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.             understanding   provide a             mindset of   detailed,         Instructions employees   logical               approach                                           In Module One, you reviewed the Final Project Guidelines and   Questions 18 points 16.2 points 12.6 points 0 points / 18   Rubric document and the associated case study zip file. For your                 Meets Outlines Outlines Does not     final project, you will assume the role of a newly hired engineering“Proficient”             questions that    questions that     outlinemanagercriteriaandbroughtneedin totobereplaceneedPeterto beQ. Robinquestions.Youhavethat been askedtodemonstratdiagnosesandaskedfixtheand problemsaskedplaguingand an eedimpto rtantbe project forkeen insight                      identifies the                      identifies the                      asked andthe company. into the appropriate appropriate does not   importance of person for person for identify the   While this activity is not a milestone for your final project, it allows   asking the each question each question, appropriate   you to get i to the role of a new manager and expl  e the case   right questions but list of person for   study in detail. This activity will als  help you identify information   to the right   questions is each questio   people to gain incomplete,     and formulate ideas you will use to complete sections II.B   the proper   and/or     (handshake issues), II.C (resources and personnel), and III (project   tools for   questions are     team) of your final project. addressed to     moving       forward   the wrong     Submit your assignment here.peoplMake sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the guidelines and rubric.Hide Rubricshttps://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=3378358&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1799582                                                                                                                                                                         1/32/4/25, 11:43 AM            2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager - EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar) - Southern …                   Rubric Nam : EMA 600     Needs         Internal Memo Rubric Not Evident Criterion Score   Criteria Exemplary Proficient   Improvement                                     Relationship 18 points 16.2 points   12.6 points 0 points / 18 Print                   Meets Describes   Describes Does not         “Proficient” intentions for   intentions for describe         criteria and building   building intentions for       Submit demonstrates relationships   relationships building       Assignment with the   with the relationships         keen insight           into the project team   project team with the       Files to submit importance of members   members, but project team       (0) file(s) to relationship     with gaps in members       submit                 building for     detail and/or           project     logic         After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.         success                                 Add a File Record Audio Record Video 0 points / 18     Rebuild Trust 18 points 16.2 points   12.6 points                       Meets Details   Details Does not         “Proficient” intentions for   intentions for detail       Comments criteria and rebuilding   rebuilding intentions for       demonstrates trust among   trust among rebuilding                   insight into the various   the various trust among         importance of project teams   project teams the various         building trust     but fails to project teams         among teams     fully provide a                 detailed,                 logical                 approach                           Managemen 18 points 16.2 points   12.6 points 0 points / 18                     t Skills Meets Describes   Describes Does not         “Proficient” personal   personal describe         criteria and management   management personal         demonstrates skills that will   skills that will management         keen insight be   be skills that will         the immediately   immediately be         management put to use   put to use, but immediately         skills that will     with gaps in put to use         be     detail and/or           immediately     logic           applicable                                 https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=3378358&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=1799582                                                                                                                                                                         2/32/4/25, 11:43 AM            2-2 Internal Memo: The New Manager - EMA-600-10548-M01 Intro to Engineer-Engineer Mgr 2025 D-1 (Jan - Mar) - Southern …CriteriaArticulation of Response  Exemplary Proficient Needs Not Evident Criterion Score   Improvement                         10 points 9 points 7 points 0 points / 10   Submission is Submission Submission Submission     free of errors has no major has major has critical     related to, errors related errors related errors related     grammar, to citations, to citations, to citations,     spelling, grammar, grammar, grammar,     syntax, and spelling, spelling, spelling,     organization syntax, or syntax, or syntax, or     and is organization organization organization     presented in a   that negatively that prevent     professional   impact understanding     and easy-to-   readability and of ideas     read format   articulation of           main ideas                     Total / 100     Overall ScorePoints earned out of 10091 points minimum The overall submission earned 91 points or more. Final calculation of grades can be found in the gradebook. Points earned out of Points earned out of Points earned out of 100 100 100 71 points minimum 1 point minimum 0 points minimum The overall submission The overall submission The overall submission earned 71 points or earned 1 points or earned 0 points or more. Final calculation more. Final calculation more. Final calculation of grades can be found of grades can be found of grades can be found in the gradebook. in the gradebook. in the gradebook.

Answer Below:

nbsp xxxx nbsp xxxx nbsp xxxxxxxx MemoJohnny xxxxxxxxxx - xxxxxxxxxxx th xxxx nbsp xx Executive xxxxxxxxxx Team xxxxx IncFrom xxxxxxxxxxx Manager xxxxxxxxxxx Battery xxxxxxxxxxx teamDate xxxxxxx th xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx first xxxxxxxxxxxxxx as xxx recently xxxxx engineering xxxxxxx for xxxxx Inc xx Lithium-Ion xxxxxxx Development xxxx LiBDT xxx been xx carefully xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx that xxxx caused xxxxxxxx team xxxxxx and x notable xxxx in xxx market xxxxx I xx aware xx the xxxxxx internal xxxxxxx failures xx our xxx battery xxxxxxxxx which xxx not xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx thermal xxxxxxxxx standards xxx the xxxxxx attention xxxxxxxx by xxx safety xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxx batteries xxx project xxx experienced xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx challenges xx a xxxxxx of xxxxx problems xx well xx growing xxxx friction xxxxxxx StatementA xxxxxxxx between xxx lithium-ion xxxxxxxxx residual xxxx generation xxx its xxxxxxxxxxx capacity xxx the xxxxx of xxx most xxxxxx prototype xxxxxxx at xxxxx Despite xxxxxxxxx industry-standard xxxxxxxx tools xxx modeling xxx according xx the xxxxx engineering xxxxxx process xxx battery xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx safe xxxxxxxxxxx limits xxxxxx testing xxx marketing xxxxxxxxxx had xxxxxxx published xxxxxxxxxx ads xxxxxxxxx a xxxx potent xxxxxxx which xxxxxx irrational xxxxxxxxxxxx for xxx product's xxxxxxxx making xxxx failure xxxx more xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx internal xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx pressure xxxx the xxxxxxxxx division xx fulfill xxxxxxxxx made xxx situation xxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx team xx split xxxx two xxxxxxx groups xxxxxxxxxx engineers xxx materials xxxxxxxxxx who xxxx on xxx heat xxxxxxxxxxx enclosure xxx electrical xxx chemical xxxxxxxxx who xxxxxxxxxxx on xxx battery's xxxxxxxx density xxxxxxxxxxxxx major xxxxxxxxxx that xxxx been xxxxxxx in xxxxx Inc xxxx been xxxx discord xxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx failure xxx instance xx has xxxx unclear xx this xxxx what xxxxxxxxxxxx led xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx team xxxxxxx it xxx been xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxxx conflicts xxxx been xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx productivity xx this xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx electrical xx chemical xxxxxxxxx and xxx mechanical xxxxxxxxx seems xxxx communication xxx collaboration xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx have xxxx strained xxx marketing xxxxxxxxxxxx desire xx launch xxx product xxxxx of xxxxxxxx has xxxxxx a xxxx between xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx with xxx latter xxxxxxx undue xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx process xx addition xx impairing xxxxxxxx cooperation xxxx misalignment xxx increased xxxx stress xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxx overheating xxxxxxx suggests xxxxxxxx flaws xx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx procedures xxxx research xxxx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx tools xxx testing xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxx differences xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx temperature xxxxxxxx during xxxxxxx Ethical xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ethical xxxxxx have xxxxxx from xxx current xxxxxxxxx majorly xxxxxxxxxx advertisements xxxx integrity xxx team xxxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxx affected xxx overall xxxxxxx In xxxx scenario xxxxxxxxx had xxxx promises xxxxxxx to xxx new xxxxxxx rsquo x capabilities xxxx had xxxx premature xxxx unresolved xxxxxxx issues xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx testing xxxxxxx raised xxxxxxxx related xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx testing xxxxxxxxxx where xxx pressure xx push xxx product xxxxxxx testing xxxxxxx safety xxxxxxxx raised xxxxxxxxx about xxx ethics xx releasing xx unsafe xxxxxxx to xxx market xxxxxxxxx Project xxx RecommendationsThe xxxxxxxxx analyses xxx recommendations xxx be xxxxxxx to xxx project xxxx Dynamics xxx Relationship xxxxxxxx Assessing xxx root xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx between xxx subgroups xx essential xxxxx when xxxxxxxxxxx whether xxxxx are xxx personalor xxxxxxxxxxxx factors xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx Doloi x intend xx meet xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx from xxxx groups xxxxxxx team-building xxxxxxxxxx and xx establishing xxxxx guidelines xxx cooperation xxx communication x will xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx for xxx another xx order xx promote xxxxxxxxxxxxx and x shared xxxxxxxxxx to xxx project's xxxxxxx cross-functional xxxxxxxxx will xx started xx enhance xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx mechanical xxxxxxxxx engineering xxx electrical xxxxxxxx engineering xxxxx Rebuilding xxxxx It xx necessary xx repair xxx corrosion xxxx stakeholders xxxxxxxxxxxx marketing xxx external xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx openness xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx state xx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx deadlines xxxxxxx amp xxxxxxxxxx I xxxx set xx frequent xxxxxxx to xx distributed xx stakeholders xx determine xxxx went xxxxx and xx show x dedication xx ongoing xxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx internal xxxxxxxxxx of xxx prototype xxxxxxx procedure xxxx be xxxxxxx out xx order xx match xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx sure xxxx any xxxxxx announcements xxxxx the xxxxxxx are xxxxx on xxxxxxxxx schedules xxx capabilities x will xxxxx a xxxx priority xx maintaining xxxx lines xx communication xxxxxxx engineering xxx marketing xxxxxxxx Project xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx with xxx marketing xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxx project's xxxxxxxx technical xxxxxxxxx considering xxx pressure xxxx marketing xx make xxxx that xx promises xxx made xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx operation xxx safety xxxx been xxxxxxxxx clear xxx attainable xxxxx must xx established xxxxxxxxx benchmarks xxx product xxxxxxxxxxx testing xxx market xxxxxxxxxxx should xx incorporated xxxx the xxxxxxx timeline xxx parties xxxxxxxx should xx made xxxxx aware xx this xxxxxxxx Addressing xxxxxxxxx Issues xx light xx the xxxxxxxxx department's xxxxxx I xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx with xxxx to xxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxx project's xxxxxxx technical xxxxxxxxx Setting xxxxxxxxxx objectives xxxx help xx guarantee xxxx no xxxxxxxx are xxxx until xxx product's xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx have xxxx confirmed x new xxxxxxxx should xx created xxxx reasonable xxxxxxxxxxx fortesting xxxxxxx development xxx market xxxxxxxxxxx All xxxxxxx involved xxxxxx receive xxxxx communication xxxxx this xxxxxxxx ConclusionThe xxxxx project xx in x critical xxxxxxxx right xxx but xx is xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx it xxx get xx back xx track xxxx strong xxxxxxxxxx and xx emphasis xx restoring xxxxxxxxxxxxx trust xxx open xxxxxxxxxxxxx I xx convinced xxxx we xxx deliver x high-performance xxxx lithium-ion xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx customer xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx VALID xx a xxxxxx in xxx industry xx tackling xxx underlying xxxxxx of xxxx discord xxxxxxxxxxx expectations xxxx stakeholders xxx maintaining xxx integrity xx our xxxxxxx testing xxxx nbsp xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx H xxxx overruns xxx failure xx project xxxxxxxxxx Understanding xxx roles xx key xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx projects xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx engineering xxx management x Dworkin x H xxx Goldwasser x A xxxxxxxx consideration xx the xxxxxx interest xx the xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx transmission xxxxxxxxxxxxx Energy xx nbsp
TAGLINE HEADING

More Subjects Homework Help