Question.4904 - Students must find 10-15 peer-reviewed journal articles that are related to a sociological topic of their choice, and format them using ASA style guide. On reading each article, students should produce annotations (not to exceed 200 words) that (1) summarize key findings from the article, (2) summarize the methodological approach, and (3) critically evaluate strengths and limitations of the article. Please refer to the Course Expectations folder for additional resources on this assignment.Final submissions for the annotated bibliography should be uploaded as a Word document here.
Answer Below:
Annotated xxxxxxxxxxxx on xxx topic xxxxxx defenders xxx access xx justice xxx people xx color xxxxxxxxx Bibliography xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Schlesinger xxxxx Racial xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx Diversion xx Analysis xx Outcomes xxxxx Men xxxxxxx With xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx Courts xxxx and xxxxxxx Annotation xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx paper xxxxxxx state xxxx felony-case xxxx to xxxxxxxxx whether xxx pre-trial xxxxx for xxxxx and xxxxxx men xx at x level xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx She xxxxxxx multivariate xxxxxxxx regression xx administrative xxxxx records xx decipher xxx fact xxxx people xx color xxx significantly xxxx likely xx be xxxxxxxx even xxxxx controlling xxx offense xxxx and xxxxxxxxx characteristics xxxxxxxxx of xxx study xxxxxxx robust xxxxxxxxxxxx controls xxx focus xx prosecutorial xxxxxxxxxx crucial xx early xxxxxxxxxxxxx racial xxxxxxxxxx Its xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxx by xxx lack xx qualitative xxxxxxx into xxx prosecutors xxx differently xxxxxxx drawback xx that xx only xxxxxxxx courts xxxx large xxxxxxxx populations xxxxxxx to x lack xx heterogeneity xx the xxxxxx size xxx therefore xxx ability xx generalize xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx offers xxxxxxxxxxx evidence xxxx systemic xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx decisions xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx disparities x shaping xxx caseloads xxxx public xxxxxxxxx must xxxxxxx Citation xxx Format xxxx Gillian xx the xxxxx Against xxx State xxxxxx Defenders xxxxxxxxxxx Bureaucracy xxx Discretion xx Criminal xxxxx Social xxxxxxx Review xxxxxxxxxx Slee xxxxx her xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx paper xx accordance xxxx a xxxxxxxxxx ethnographic xxxxx in x Midwestern xxxxxx defender xxxxxx observing xxxxxxxxx interactions xxxxxxxx meetings xxx client xxxxxxxxxxxxx Her xxxxxxxx explains xxx defenders xxxxxxxx conflicting xxxxxxx - xxxxx policy xxxxxxxx versus xx ethical xxxxxxxx commitment xx clients xx color xxx is xxxxxxxx in xxx approach xx critical xxxxxxxxx Qualitative xxxxxxxxxxx explains xxx the xxxxxxxx avoids xxxxxxxx injustices xxxx as xxxxxxxx advocacy xxx selective xxxx negotiations xxx strength xx the xxxxx is xxx rich xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx evaluation xx defenders xxxxx in xxxxx while xx is xxxxxxx in xxx scope xxx to xxxxxxxxxx concentration xxx absence xx quantitative xxxxxxx data xxxxxxxxx generalizability xxxxxxxxxxx Slee x work xxxxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxxx discretion xxxxxx a xxxxxxxxx intervention xxx equitable xxxxxxx Citation xxx Format xxxxxxxxx Brendon xxxxxx Sentencing xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx Progression xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx Justice xxxxxx Evidence xxxx Linked xxxxxxx and xxxxx Court xxxx Working xxxxx Annotation xx this xxxxx federal xxx state xxxxx records xxxx to xxxx been xxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx He xxxxxxx selection-adjusted xxxxxxxxxx methods xx find xxx at xxxxx stage xx sentencing xx the xxxx of xxxxxx disparities xxxx prevalent xxx analysis xxxxxxx differential xxxxxxxxx of xxxxx manifested xxxxxxx sentencing xxxx being xxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxx sentencing xxxxxx in xxx federal xxxxx while xx state xxxxxx these xxxx accumulate xxxx successive xxxx events xxxxxxxxx include xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rigorous xxxx correction xxx layered xxxxx analysis xxxxxxxxxxx include xxx working-paper xxxxxx not xxx peer-reviewed xxx absence xx direct xxxxxxx on xxxxxxx quality xx defender xxxxxxxxxxxxx Nevertheless xxx findings xxxxxxxxxxxx illustrate xxxxxxxxxx layering xx racial xxxxxxxxxxxx conditions xxxx frame xxx environment xxxxx public xxxxxxxxx operate xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx CorbettDavies xxx Emma xxxxxxx Avi xxxxxx and xxxxxx Goel xxxxxxxxxxx Decision xxxxxx and xxx Cost xx Fairness xxxxxxx of xxxxxxx Learning xxxxxxxx Workshop xxxxx Annotation xxxx interdisciplinary xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx have xxxxxxx algorithmic xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx risk xxxxxxxxxxx using xxx epistemological xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx optimization xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Broward xxxxxx data xxxx highlight xxx risk xx prioritizing xxxxxxxxxxx parity xxxx predictive xxxxxxxx essentially x trade-off xxxxxxx fairness xxx public xxxxxx The xxxxxxx though xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx advocates xxxxxxx algorithmic xxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx obstacles xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxx to xxxx Mathematical xxxxx and xxxx data xxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxx paper xxxxx its xxxxxxxxxxx include xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx readers xxx less xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx action xx favor xx an xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx focus xxxxxxxxxxxx it xxxxxx a xxxxx conceptual xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxxx how xxxxxxx tools xxx both xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx racial xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx contexts xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Hatton xxxx Research xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Defense xxxxxx Embedding xxxxxx Workers xx Public xxxxxxxx Offices xxxxxx for xxxxxxx Innovation xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx synthesizes xxxxxxxxxx studies xxxx quantitative xxx qualitative xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx defense xxxxxx especially xx terms xx integrating xxxxxx workers xxxx public xxxxxxx teams xxxxxxxxx case xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx the xxxxx finds xxxxxxxx client xxxxx increased xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx barriers xxx mixed xxxxxxxxxxxx results-such xx more xxxxxxxxxxxx sentences xx North xxxxxxxx It xxxx discusses xxxx implementation xxxxxxxxxx related xx role xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx coordination xxxxxxxxx include x comprehensive xxxxxxxxxx review xxx practical xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx offices xxxx are xxxxxxxxxxx holistic xxxxxx However xx a xxxxx it xxxxx the xxxxxxxx data xxx rigor xxxxxxxx of xx academic xxxxxxx Its xxxxx lies xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx able xx translate xxx research xxxx actionable xxxxxxxxx guidance xxx advancing xxxxxx justice xx defense xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Center xxx Justice xxxxxxxxxx Public xxxxxxx Attorneys xxxxxxxxxx of xxxx and xxxx Annotation xxxx survey xxxxxxxxx responses xxxx public xxxxxxxxx across xxx United xxxxxx regarding xxxxx views xx race xxx bias xxxxxxx merged xxxxxxxxxxxx responses xxx open-ended xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx found xxxx defenders xx color xxxx more xxxxx of xxxxxx inequities xx both xxxxx offices xxx client's xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx is xxxxx and xxx methodology xxxxx which xxxxx it xxxx be xxxxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxx perspectives xx racial xxxxxxx However xxx data xxx self-report xxx not xxxxx on xxx actual xxxxxxx of xxxxx Finally xxx sample xxx an xxxx sample xxx does xxx necessarily xxxxxxxxx all xxxxxxx of xxx field xx still xxxxx at xxx race xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx affect xxxxxxx practice xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Ulmer xxxxxxx T xxxxx T xxxxxx and xxxxxxx Steffensmeier xxxxxx and xxxxxx Disparities xx Structural xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx White xxxxx and xxxxxxxx Comparisons xxxxxx Science xxxxxxxxx Annotation xxx authors xxxx on xxxxxxxxxx analysis xx census xxx crime xxxx from xxxxxxxxxx and xxx York xx order xx link xxxxxxxxxx disadvantage-poverty xxxxxxxxxxxx single-parent xxxxxxxxxxxxx racial xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx crime xxxxxxxxx of xxx study xxxxxxx its xxxxxxxxxxx framing xx the xxxxxx conditions xxxx drive xxx overrepresentation xx people xx color xx justice xxxxxxx Limitations xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx focus xx public xxxxxxx but xx does xxxxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx pressures xxxxxxx public xxxxxxxxxx caseloads xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Matei xxxxx Jeanette xxxxxxxxx and xxx Siegel xxxxxxxx on xxx Implementation xx Holistic xxxxxxx Models xxxxxxxxx Social xxxxxxx in xxxxxx Defender xxxxxxx Center xxx Justice xxxxxxxxxx Annotation xxxx report xxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx defense xx the xxx counties xx Minnesota xxxxx a xxxxx whereby xxxxxx service xxxxxxx join xxxxxxxx teams xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx reviews xxxxxx that xxxx mode xxxxxxxx client xxxxx and xxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx social xxxxxxxxx mainly xxx clients xx color xxxxxxxxxx are xxxx the xxxxxxxxx are xx real-life xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx experience xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx geography xxx lack xx quantitative xxxxxxxx weaken xxx generalizability xxxxxxxxxxxx it xxxxxxxx evidence xxxx this xxxxxxxx model xxx be xxxxxx able xx support xxxxxxxxxxxx clients xx the xxxxxxx system xxxxxxxx ASA xxxxxx Berk xxxxxxx Jonathan x Morgan xxx Andrew x Papachristos xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx Justice xxxx Assessments xxx State xx the xxx arXiv xxxxxxxx Annotation xxxx Morgan xxx Papachristos xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx research xxxxx fairness xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxx assessments xxxxxxxxx challenges xx satisfying xxxxxxxxxxx fairness xxxxxxxx Their xxxxxxxxx motivates xxx critics xx algorithmic xxxxx Its xxxxxxxx is xxx breadth xxx clarity xxxxx its xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxx nature xxxxxxx empirical xxxx tests xxxxx equip xxx defenders xxxx conceptual xxxxx for xxxxxxx policy xxxxxxxx Citation xxx Format xxxxxxxx Brian xxx Tirthankar xxxxxxxx An xxxxx Experiment xx Identify xxx Effect xx Racial xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxxx to xxxxxxx A xxxxxxxxxxx Approach xxxxx Preprint xxxxxxxxxx This xxxxx randomized xxxxxxxx experiment xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx and xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx differential xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx depending xx the xxxxxxxxx racial xxxx of xxxxx names xxxxxxx sent xxxxxxxxx email xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx coded xxxxx to xxx firms xx Florida xxx subsequently xxxxxxxx response xxxxx across xxxxxxxxx Although xxxxxxx was xxxxxxxxxxxxxx determined xxxxxxx of xxxxxx sizes xxx experimental xxxxxx innovatively xxxxxx access xxxx in xxx system xxx major xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxxxxx innovation xxxxxx its xxxxx limitation xx lack xx final xxxxxxx and xxxxx on xxxxxxx lawyers xxxxxx than xxxxxx defenders xxx it xxxxxxxxxxxx empirical xxxxx can xx used xx identify xxxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx accessMore Articles From Seminar in Socio Research
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
