Week Course Project Thesis Statement and Annotated Bibliography AssignmentRequired ResourcesRead review the following resources for 5033

Critical Reasoning PHIL 347

Question.5033 - Week 5Course Project: Thesis Statement and Annotated Bibliography AssignmentRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 12LessonInstructions in Week 5 WorkbookInstructionsCourse Project OverviewWeek 5 Assignment: This week, you will submit a thesis statement and an annotated bibliography of at least five sources that you will use in your paper, as well as a brief statement explaining how the source supports your argument. Your paper should include the following: Your selected topic from Week 2Part 1: A thesis statement stating your opinion/conclusion on the issue you chose in Week 2, the supporting points you will offer, and at least one relevant opposing view you will address. Part 2: An annotated bibliography with an evaluation of at least five (5) sources you intend to use in your final paper to support your claim. The annotation will include 1) Full citation in APA format, 2) a brief description of the content of the source, and 3) a brief statement of how the source supports your argument. These sources provide evidence to support the idea that your claim should be accepted by the reader. Scholarly sources are preferred and should be used where available; due to the nature of some of the topics, authoritative articles in very high-quality substantive journals may also be acceptable. A brief statement of how the source supports your argument. Example (Excerpt)Chosen Topic: Does the burden of student loans cause young adults to have trouble developing self-sufficiency and individualism?Thesis Statement: The current pattern of young adults remaining with family because they cannot afford independent living due to student loan obligations is having a negative effect on young adults developing self-sufficiency and individualism.Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults.â¯American Sociological Review, 51, 541â554. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095586The authors use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They found their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. This source strongly supports my thesis that the current pattern of young adults remaining with family because they cannot afford independent living due to student loan obligations is having a negative effect on young adults developing self-sufficiency and individualism.Writing RequirementsLength:100â150 wordsâ¯for the Thesis Statement in Part 1;In Part 2, in addition to the APA citation,â¯50â80 wordsâ¯per source are used for a brief description of the source's content, and 50â80 words are used to describe how you will use the source in your essay. 1-inch margins Double spaced 12-point Times New Roman font Title page GradingThis activity will be graded using the W5 Course Project Grading Rubric. OutcomesCO 3: Analyze deductive and inductive reasoning structures. CO 4: Evaluate arguments by applying standard tests. COâ¯5: Evaluate the role of cognitive bias and fallacies of relevance in critical reasoning and decision-making.CO 7: Create a fallacy-free argument that incorporates principles of ethical decision-making.

Answer Below:

Week xxxxxxxxxx Course xxxxxxx Thesis xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx BibliographyPHIL xxxxxxxx ReasoningJune xx Part xxxxxx StatementUndocumented xxxxxxxxxx have xxxxxxxxxxx significantly xx the x S xxxxxxx culture xxx workforce xxx therefore x structured xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx should xx established xx regularize xxxxx status x clear xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx would xxxxxx exploitation xxxxxxxx tax xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx national xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx residents xxxxxxx legal xxxxxxxx Additionally xxxxxxxxxxx opportunities xxxxx enhance xxxxxx stability xxx community xxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx residents xxxxxxx argue xxxx providing xxxxxxxxxxx may xxxxxxxxxxx future xxxxxxx immigration xxx undermine xxx rule xx law xxxxxxx these xxxxxxxx can xx addressed xxxxxxx firm xxxxxx policies xxx requiring xxxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xx meet xxxxxxxxxxx conditions xxxx as xxxxx records xxxxxxxxxx history xxx community xxxxxxxxxxxx Ultimately xxx moral xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx benefits xx a xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx path xx citizenship xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx making xx a xxxxxxxxx policy xxxxxx for x more xxxxxxxxx and xxxx society xxxx Annotated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sackey-Ansah x Ethical xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx United xxxxxx A xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xxxxxxxxxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxxxx Journal xx Holistic xxxxxxx Studies xxxxx doi xxx Description xxxx article xxxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxxxxxx frameworks xxxxxxx U x immigration xxxxxxx particularly xxxxxxxxxx undocumented xxxxxxxxxx It xxxxxxxxx religious xxxxx rights xxx social xxxxxxx arguments xxxxxxxx inclusive xxxxxxxxxxx policies xxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx This xxxxxx supports xx argument xx emphasizing xxxx citizenship xxx undocumented xxxxxxxxxx is xxx only x political xxxxxxxx but x moral xxxxxxxxxx It xxxxxxxxx legal xxxxxx from xxxxxxx standpoints xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx fairness xxx human xxxxxxx Article xxxxxxxx G xxx cracks xx legality xxx documentation xxxxxx residence xx the xxxxxx States xxxxxx deportation xx Mexico xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Studies xxxxx doi xxx Description xxxxxxxx uses xxxxxxxxxxx interviews xx examine xxx deported xxxxxxxxxxx navigated xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxx in xxx U x The xxxxx explores xxx precarious xxxxxxxxxxxxx status xxxxxxx identity xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx Support xxx Argument xxxx article xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx pathways xxxx trap xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx statuses xx strengthens xx claim xxxx a xxxxx pathway xx citizenship xxxxx reduce xxxxx ambiguity xxx better xxxxxxx immigrant xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Article xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx R xxxxxxxxx citizenship xxxxxxxx Law xxxxxx https xxx org xxx rejectingDescription xxxx article xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx that xxx immigrants xxxx citizenship xxxxxxxxx why xxxx reject xx due xx structural xxxxxxxxx disillusionment xx legal xxxxxxxx It xxxxxxx debates xxxxxxxxxxx the x S xxxxxxxxxxx Act xx Support xxx Argument xx addressing xxxx the xxxxxx for xxx rejection xx citizenship xxxx source xxxxx frame xxx complexity xx the xxxxxxxxxxx debate xx supports xx argument xxxx reform xxxx also xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx that xxxx citizenship xxxxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxxxx Article xxxxxx M x Review xx We xxx Americans xxxxxxxxxxxx Students xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx Dream xx W xxxxx Journal xx College xxx Character xxxxxxxxxxx This xxxxxx summarizes xxxxxxx Perez x interviews xxxx undocumented xxxxxxxx striving xxx education xxx better xxxxx It xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx challenges xxx strong xxxx to xxxxxxxx identity xxxxxxx legal xxxxxxxxx Support xxx Argument xxxx source xxxxxxxx real-life xxxxxxx showing xxx undocumented xxxxx raised xx the x S xxxxxxx identify xx Americans xx supports xxx emotional xxx social xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxx undocumented xxxxxxxxx Article xxxxxx D xxxxxx R xxxxxxx C xxxxxx citizenship xx organizing xxxxxxxxx of xxx US xxxxxxxxxxx system xx analysis xx how xxx why xx broaden xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx residence xxx naturalization xxx new xxxxxxxxx Journal xx Migration xxx Human xxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxxxxxxxxx This xxxxxx analysis xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx naturalization xx a xxxx principle xx immigration xxxxxx It xxxxxxxx removing xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx administrative xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx access xx permanent xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Support xxx Argument xxxx source xxxxxxxx supports xx thesis xx offering xxxxxxxxxxxxxx strategies xxx implementing x pathway xx citizenship xx also xxxxxxxxx economic xxx democratic xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xx full xxxxxxxx ReferencesCuison-Villazor x Rejecting xxxxxxxxxxx Michigan xxx Review xxxxx doi xxx mlr xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx D xxxxxx R xxxxxxx C xxxxxx citizenship xx organizing xxxxxxxxx of xxx US xxxxxxxxxxx system xx analysis xx how xxx why xx broaden xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx residence xxx naturalization xxx new xxxxxxxxx Journal xx Migration xxx Human xxxxxxxx https xxx org xxxxxxxx G xxx cracks xx legality xxx documentation xxxxxx residence xx the xxxxxx States xxxxxx deportation xx Mexico xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Studies xxxxx doi xxx Sackey-Ansah x Ethical xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx in xxx United xxxxxx A xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xxxxxxxxxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxxxx Journal xx Holistic xxxxxxx Studies xxxxx doi xxx Streit x R xxxxxx of xx ARE xxxxxxxxx Undocumented xxxxxxxx Pursuing xxx American xxxxx by x Perez xxxxxxx of xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx