Question.4567 - Week 3: Addressing Wicked ProblemsUsing the readings and the table that summarizes tame and wicked problems as a reference, do the following for your selected concept/practitioner/organization for the CFS Narrative:Identify a problem that is being addressed.Identify the stakeholders.Identify the stopping role.Describe the nature of the problem.Requirements: You must respond to each discussion board each week with your own reply to the provided prompts; this can be done via a written response or a video recording. Beyond that, you must participate in 9 weeks out of the 11 weeks of discussion boards with replies to classmates.Those 10 replies to classmates’ posts will require two elements:A 100 word written response each week that you choose to participateOne question each week that you choose to participate (i.e. literally one sentence that ends in a question mark)Note: These replies/questions can be with the same person or different people. You may choose how you manage your reply/question each week amongst the posts available to you when you log on. Essentially, each week you must post a thorough reply to the provided prompts. In 9/11 weeks (your choice as to which weeks you will and will not participate), you must also respond to a peer in 100 words, plus an additional question to the same person or another person (your choice). The idea is that you have 2 weeks off from replies during the semester; you can front load by doing them all in Weeks 1-9, or you can intentionally participate when you know you have more time. We understand that life happens, so you have a 2 week off buffer within the semester that you can use to best fit your schedule and lifestyle. There will, however, be separate requirements for the final discussion board for the final presentations. These requirements will be outlined in that assignment.
Answer Below:
Problem xxxxx Addressed xxxxxxx Food xxxxxxx an xxxxx of xxxxx food xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx nutritious xxxxxxxxxx appropriate xxxxx available xx low-income xxx marginalized xxxxxxxxxxx here xx New xxxx City xxx issue xx not x lack xx food xxx rather xxxxxxxxxx inequities xxxx lead xx permanent xxxxxxxx of xxxxxx affordability xxx cultural xxxxxxxxx within xxx urban xxxx system xxxx insecurity xx according xx Hamm xx essential xxxxxxxxx of xx unhealthy xxxx system xxx one xxxxxxxx area xxx systemic xxxxxx this xxx turned xxxx a xxxxxx problem xxxxxxx of xxx deep xxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxx justice xxxxxxxx access xxx sustainability xxxxxx Hamm xxxxxxxxxxxx Involved xxxxxxx Food xxx quite x wide xxxxx of xxxxxxx stakeholders xxxxxxx NYC xxxx policy xxxxxxxxx Policymakers xxx funders xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Food-insecure xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Community-based xxxxxxxxxxxxx distribution xxxxxxxx Local xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx kitchens xxxx donors xxxx likely xxxxx groups xxxx differing xxxxx of xxx problem xxx priorities xxx solutions xxxx diversity xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx characterization xx wicked xxxxxxxx in xxxxx conflicting xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx are xxxx by xxxxxxxxxxxx thus xxxxxxxxxx must xx collaborative xxx iterative xxxxxxx et xx Stopping xxxx Rethink xxxx s xxxxxxx does xxx have x clear xxx point- xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx problem xxx Grochowska xxxxxx problems xxxx stopping xxxxx and xxx only xx managed xxx solved xxxxxxxxxx Rethink xxxx modifies xxx operational xxxx continuously xxxxx on xxx needs xx community xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changes xxxx developing xx endless xxx response-driven xxxx Nature xx the xxxxxxx Food xxxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxx Food xx a xxxxx multidimensional xxxxxxx dependent xxxxxxxxxx involving xxxxxxxx inequalities xxxxxxx disconnection xxx mistrust xx institutions xxxxxxxxxxxx within xxx underrepresented xxxxxxxxxxx Accordingly xxx these xxxxx sources xxxxxxxxx that xxxx problems xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxxx solutions xxxxxxxxx framework xxxxx that xxxxx problems xxxxxxx individualized xxx stakeholder-informed xxxxxxxxx while xxxx strengthens xxx call xxx diverse xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx strategies xx transition xxxxxx a xxxxxxxxx food xxxxxx Kreuter xx al xxxx ReferencesKreuter x W xx Rosa x Howze x H xxxxxxx G x Understanding xxxxxx Problems x Key xx Advancing xxxxxxxxxxxxx Health xxxxxxxxx Health xxxxxxxxx Behavior xxxx M x Principles xxx Framing x Healthy xxxx System xxxxxxx of xxxxxx Environmental xxxxxxxxx Grochowska x Specificity xx Food xxxxxxxx Concept xx a xxxxxx Problem xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx Science xxx Technology x Peer xxxxxxxx Peer xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx Elizabeth xxxxx answer xxxx analysis xxxxxx provides x thoughtful xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Virginia xxxx Rescue xxx the xxx program x appreciate xxx you xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxx insecurity xxx food xxxxx as xxxxxx rooted xxxxxxxx Your xxxxxxx that xx one xxxxx solution xxxxxx for xxxxx problems xx especially xxxxxxxxxxxxxx systemic xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx access xx food xxxxxxxx them xx is xx hope xxxx as xxxx community-initiated xxxxxxx flourish xxxx would xxxx tangible xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx impacts xx long-term xxxx security x also xxxxxxxxxx your xxxxx about xxx interconnection xx the xxx problems-that xxxx waste xxx be xxxxxxxxxxx redirected xx address xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx hunger xxxxxxxx How xxx we xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx changes xxxx could xxxxxxx benefit xxx impact xx these xxxxxxxx in xxx long xxxxMore Articles From Advanced Concepts in Community Food Systems
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
