Assignment Elaborate on a Case About Potential Jury TamperingTop of FormHide Assignment InformationTurnitin This assignment 5045

CJA352 Criminal Law and Procedure

Question.5045 - Assignment 3: Elaborate on a Case About Potential Jury TamperingTop of FormHide Assignment InformationTurnitinâ¢This assignment will be submitted to Turnitinâ¢.InstructionsBegin this assignment by reviewing the following case: People v. Albert, 50 Cal. App. 5th 743 Then, prepare a written report that includes the following:Sometimes, tampering with a juror can result in a mistrial or a new trial. Discuss the misconduct that happened in this case and the reasons the court gave for denying the defendantsâ motions for a new trial.Length: 3-4 pages, not including title and reference pagesReferences: Support your assignment with at least 2 scholarly resources.The completed assignment should address all the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards.When applicable, conduct a Turnitin pre-check and then upload your completed assignment and click the Submit to Dropbox button.Bottom of Form

Answer Below:

Assignment xxxxxxxxx on x Case xxxxx Potential xxxx TamperingCJA xxxxxxxx Law xxx ProcedureMarch xx IntroductionThe xxxx People x Albert xxx App xx involved x post-trial xxxxx of xxxxx misconduct xx a xxxxxxxxxxxx murder xxx gang xxxxxxxxxxxxx trial xxxxx the xxxxxx verdict xxx of xxx jurors xxxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxxxx encounter xxxxxx the xxxxx raising xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxxx juror xxxx The xxxxxxx sought x new xxxxx on xxx grounds xxxx this xxxxxxx may xxxx improperly xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx decision xxx court xxxxxxxxxx denied xxx defendants xxxxxxx for x new xxxxx ruling xxxx the xxxxxxxx did xxx meet xxx legal xxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx juror xxxx This xxxxxx examines xxx nature xx the xxxxxxx juror xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx reasoning xxxxxx the xxxxxxx denial xxx the xxxxxxx implications xx the xxxxxx Juror xxxxxxxxxx AllegationDuring xxx trial xxxxx No xxx visited xx his xxxx by xx individual xxx introduced xxxxxxx as xxx brother xx one xx the xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx surprised xx this xxxxxxxxxxx visit xxxxxxxxxxx informed xxx visitor xxxx he xxxxx not xxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx how xxx individual xxx obtained xxx home xxxxxxx Anonymous xx response xxx visitor xxxxxx visibly xxxxxxx admitted xxxx he xxxxxx not xx there xxx promptly xxxx The xxxxx described xxx incident xx frightening xxx later xxxx personal xxxxxxxx measures xx carrying x legal xxxxxxx Refer xx the xxxx Study xxxxxxx he xxx not xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx to xxx court xxxxx after xxx trial xxx concluded xxx defense xxxxxx that xxxx incident xxxxxxxxxxx juror xxxxxxxxxx claiming xxxx the xxxxx created xx atmosphere xx intimidation xxxx could xxxx biased xxx juror xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx They xxxxxxxxx that xxxx if xxx visit xxx not xxxxxxx threatening xx could xxxx influenced xxx juror x perception xx the xxxx and xxxxxxxx his xxxxxxxxxxxx Based xx these xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx filed xxxxxxx for x new xxxxx asserting xxxx the xxxxx s xxxxxxxxxx compromised xxx fairness xx the xxxxxxxxxxx Court x Rationale xxx Denying xxx MotionThe xxxxx court xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx motions xxx a xxx trial xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx was xx substantial xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx juror xxxx The xxxxx relied xx multiple xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxxxxxxx First xxxxx was xx evidence xxxxxxxxxx that xxx defendants xxx orchestrated xx directed xxx juror x visitor xx approach xxx The xxxx fact xxxx the xxxxxxx identified xxxxxxx as x defendant x sibling xxx not xxxxxxxxx any xxxxxxxxxx between xxx defendants xxx the xxx Without xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx juror xxxxxxxxx by xxx defendants xxx court xxxxx no xxxxx to xxxxxxxx that xxx visit xxxxxxxxxxx an xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx influence xxx verdict xxxxxxxxx Second xxx conversation xxxxxxx the xxxxx and xxx visitor xxx not xxxxxxx any xxxxxxxxxx of xxx trial x merits xxx court xxxxx that xxx extraneous xxxxxxx to xx considered xxxxxxxxxxx there xxxx be x communication xxxx directly xxxxxxx to xxx case xx this xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx did xxx reference xxx evidence xxxxxxxxx or xxxxx matters xxxxx considered xx the xxxx Refer xx the xxxx Study xxx exchange xxx brief xxxxxxxxx and xxx not xxxxxxx any xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx interpreted xx an xxxxxxx to xxxx the xxxxx s xxxxxxxx Third xxx nature xx the xxxxxxxxx itself xxx not xxxx to xxx level xx intimidation xx coercion xxxxx While xxx juror xxxxxxxx that xx was xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx determined xxxx his xxxx stemmed xxxx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx nature xx the xxxxx rather xxxx any xxxxxxxx threat xx pressure xxx visitor xxxx immediately xxxxx the xxxxx expressed xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx was xx follow-up xxxxxxx or xxxxxxxx attempts xx engage xxxx him xxxxx the xxxxxxxx nature xx the xxxxxxxx the xxxxx concluded xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx juror xxxx was xxxxxxx Fourth xxx juror x response xx the xxxxxxxx further xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx s xxxxxxxxxx that xx substantial xxxxxxxxx had xxxxxxxx Although xx took xxxxxxxxxx personal xxxxxxxx measures xx continued xx serve xx the xxxx without xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx The xxxxx interpreted xxxx as xx indication xxxx the xxxxx did xxx believe xxx ability xx be xxxxxxxxx had xxxx compromised xxxxx to xxx Case xxxxx His xxxxxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx during xxx trial xxx viewed xx passive xxxxxxxxxx at xxxxx rather xxxx evidence xx an xxxxxxxxxx influenced xxxxxxx No xxxxxxxxxxx for x Bias xxxxxxxxxx defense xxxx argued xxxx the xxxxx court xxxxx by xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx whether xxx juror xxx been xxxxxx by xxx encounter xxx appellate xxxxx rejected xxxx claim xxxxxxxxxxx that xxx defense xxx never xxxxxxxx requested xxxx a xxxxxxx The xxxxx held xxxx in xxx absence xx a xxxxxxxx request xx had xx obligation xx conduct xx inquiry xxxx potential xxxxx bias xxxxxxxx the xxxxx found xxxx the xxxxxx did xxx support x finding xx bias xxxxxxxxxxx enough xx warrant x hearing xxxxx the xxxxx continued xxx service xxxxxxx complaint xxx the xxxxxxxx did xxx involve xxxxxxxxxxx about xxx trial xxxxx was xx clear xxxxxx to xxxxxxx prejudice xxxx In xxxxxxxx its xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx court xxxxxx on xxxxx precedent xxxxxxxxxxxx In xx Hamilton xxxxx involved x similar xxxxxxxxx where x juror xxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxx member xxxx her xxxx but xxx not xxxxxx it xx the xxxx In xxxx case xxx California xxxxxxx Court xxxxx that xxxx an xxxxxxxxx without x direct xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx the xxxxx did xxx constitute xxxxxxxxxxx misconduct xxx court xx People x Albert xxxxxxx this xxxx principle xxxxxxxxxx that xxx juror x experience xxx not xxxx the xxxxxxxxx threshold xxx establishing xxxx ConclusionThe xxxxx s xxxxxx in xxxxxx v xxxxxx reinforces xxx legal xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx juror xxxxxxx does xxx automatically xxxxxxx a xxx trial xxxxxx it xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx likelihood xx bias xxx visit xxxx the xxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxx while xxxxxxxxxx for xxx juror xxx brief xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx not xxxxxxx any xxxxxxxxxx of xxx case xxx court xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx factors xxxxxxxx with xxx lack xx evidence xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx to xxx encounter xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx that xxx juror x impartiality xxx been xxxxxxxxxxx By xxxxxxx the xxxxxx for x new xxxxx the xxxxx upheld xxx principle xxxx juror xxxx must xx demonstrable xxx significant xx warrant xxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx The xxxxxx also xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxx reporting xxx the xxxxx disclosed xxx encounter xxxxxx the xxxxx the xxxxx might xxxx had xx opportunity xx assess xxx impact xxxx thoroughly xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx court x decision xx affirm xxx convictions xxxxxxxxxx the xxxx bar xxxx must xx met xxx juror xxxxxxxxxx claims xx result xx a xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxx ReferencesAnonymous xxx basics xx criminal xxx University xx Minnesota xxxxx E xxxxxxx Coercive xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx Lessons xxxx International xxxxxxxx Law xx New xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx Violence xxxxxxxxxxx pp x Routledge xxxx G xxxxxxxxxxx risk xx prejudice xx the xxxxxxxxxx judge xxxxx probable xxxxx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx committed xxx offense xxx defendant xxxx remain xxxxx for xxxxx In xxx absence xx probable xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx judge xxxx dismiss xxx complaint xxx discharge xxx defendant xxxxxxxxx does xxx preclude xxxxxxxxxx prosecution xxx the xxxx offense xxx LJ xxx Rev xxxx Proc xxxxxx v xxxxxx Cal xxx th xxx Rptr x Cal xxx LEXIS xxxxx of xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Fourth xxxxxxxxx District xxxxxxxx TwoJune xxxxxxx Filed xxxxx advance xxxxx com xxx document xxxxxxxxxx cases xx urn xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxx -FGRY-B xxx - xxxxxxx identityprofileid xxx VP