Here we discuss the Two-Way Anova and interaction effects This will be a detailed discussion 4841- CoachOnCouch

Statistics for Psychology

Question.4841 - 0000Here we discuss the Two-Way Anova and interaction effects. This will be a detailed discussion worth 10 points so plan accordingly. Image by Ulrike Leone from Pixabay Please use the following instructions:Please answer the following questions:What is a factorial Anova and how is the 2x2 (two by two), Two-Way Anova a good example of the concept of factorial Anova? Also explain what the 2x2 notation means and how you would read statements like "we used a 3x2 Anova" or "we used a 4x4, Two-Way Anova". Explain any questions you have about the purpose or calculation of the Two-Way Anova. Read and analyze one of the two following papers about persuasion as analyzed with a Two Way Anova (click here) or, for a challenge, a Three-Way Anova. Three-Way Anova (click here). List the variables in that analysis and explain what the main effects and interaction effects are. List the APA formatted results for any of the main effects or interaction effects which were reported in the paper. Explain how the authors interpreted the results AND what you found interesting about the results. Explain what this shows you about factorial Anova including Two-Way Anova and if learning to scrutinize the statistics and numerical results within papers is changing how you read journal articles. ** The main post should be at least 500 words. Please reply to at least 2 classmates and each reply should be 200 words or more. Remember that we are using discussions and SPSS instead of hand calculations and extensive testing so we expect very strong participation in the discussions and extensive main posts and replies. Post sooner rather than later to give people a chance to see your replies. Help each other answer questions. *

Answer Below:

Part x factorial xxxxx is xxx of xxx statistical xxxx which xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxx or xxxx independent xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx design xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx effect xx each xxxxxxxxxxx variable xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx between xxxx The xxx way xxxxx is x good xxxxxxx of xxx concept xx factorial xxxxx It xxxxxxxx two xxxxxxx and xxx levels xxx notation xxxxxx to xxx fact xxxx there xxx two xxxxxxx The xxxxxxx are xxx independent xxxxxxxxx and xxxx factor xxx two xxxxxx which xxx referred xx as xxxxxxxxxx For xxxxxxxx let xx consider x research xxxxxxxx in xxxxx the xxxxx aims xx determine xxx study xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx time xxxxxx the xxxxxx in xx exam xxx two xxxxxxxxxxx variables xxx study xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx time xxxxx are xxx two xxxxxxx we xxxxxxxx The xxxxx factor xxxxx environment xxx two xxxxxx Quiet xxxx and xxxxx room xxx second xxxxxx study xxxx has xxx levels xxxx and xxxx This xxxxx is xxxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxx design xxxxx it xxx two xxxxxxx each xxxx two xxxxxx The xxxxxx results xx four xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx Quiet xxxx hour xx studyQuiet xxxx hours xx studyNoisy xxxx hour xx studyNoisy xxxx hours xx studyWhen xx use x ANOVA xx means xxxx we xxx describing xxx design xxxx two xxxxxxx where xxx first xxxxxx has xxxxxx and xxx second xxxxxx has xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx experimental xxxxxxxxx we xxx from xxxxx is xx obtain xxxxxxxxx conditions xx the xxxxxxx When xx use x ANOVA xx means xxxx we xxx describing xxx design xxxx two xxxxxxx where xxx first xxxxxx has xxxxxx and xxx second xxxxxx has xxxxxx The xxxxx number xx conditions xx this xxxxxx is xx each xxxx the xxxxxxxxx design xxxxxx us xx examine xxx main xxxxxxx of xxxx factor xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx effect xxxxxxx them xxxx I xxxxxxxx to xxxx the xxxxx way xxxxx paper xx includes xxxxx independent xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxx each xxx independent xxxxxxxxx are xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx strong xx weak xxx depletion xxxx vs xxx and xxxxxxxx proximity xxxxx in xxxx vs xxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx variable xx the xxxxxxxx towards xxx proposal xxx main xxxxxx of xxxx independent xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx variable xxx Main xxxxxx of xxxxxxxx strength xx attitude xxxx effect xx ego xxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx and xxxx effect xx temporal xxxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx We xxxx two xxxxxxxxxxx effects xxx is xxx two xxx interactions xxx the xxxxx one xx the xxxxx way xxxxxxxxxxx Two xxx interactions xxxxxxx Argument xxxxxxxx Ego xxxxxxxxx Argument xxxxxxxx Temporal xxxxxxxxx Ego xxxxxxxxx Temporal xxxxxxxxx Three xxx interactions xxxxxxx Argument xxxxxxxx Ego xxxxxxxxx Temporal xxxxxxxxx From xxx paper xxx APA xxxxxxxxx results xxx the xxxx effect xx argument xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx as x significant xxxx effect xx argument xxxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx toward xxx proposal xxx found x p x indicating xxxx the xxxxxx argument xxxxxxxxx attitudes xxxx were xxxx favorable x SE xxxx those xxxxxxxx by xxx weak xxxxxxxx M xx CIs xxx respectively xxx three-way xxxxxxxxxxx argument xxxxxxxx vs xxx depletion xx temporal xxxxxxxxx proved xx be xxxxxxxxxxxxx F x p